https://voat.co/v/ProtectVoat/3253353/18964392/?
You've just picked a side, and you've declared yourself my enemy.
You guys are honestly getting unhinged. Can we all take a step back and breathe, please?
I've lurked for a very long time. I know what's about to happen to me. I'm going to be called every name under the book, my comment history is going to be combed-through for attack vectors, and the mob is going to be turned against me.
All to mitigate my reasonable affect on the conversation.
I don't expect you to be my personal army. But I expect you to be a responsible individual and actively refrain from degenerating the debate around here.
I can disagree with you without being a shillkikeniggerfaggot, okay?
view the rest of the comments →
virge ago
Oh you poor subversive drama queen. An army of one tells you he's done trying to convince you to save Voat, and now you declare yourself a target.
Amusingly, demonstrating the very same guilt and virtue signalling tactics I accused you of, in the very same paragraph you copied your selectively picked quote from no less. https://voat.co/v/ProtectVoat/3253353/18964392
Subversive faggots are hilariously transparent. Nobody cares, anyone with a brain can see right through you and all the rest of the useless piece of shit welfare eaters don't have skin in the game to begin with.
Keep crying to an audience of none.
fuchs_davis ago
See? Imagine what he would do if he also knew how I voted.
virge ago
That's exactly why you're so afraid of transparency. It shows if your actions are true to your voting. And yours probably aren't.
I don't care how a 30-day old sock puppet votes. You're literally talking into the abyss. Nobody cares. I imagine if I saw how you voted it'd either prove you were honest about what you say and we'd agree to disagree, or it'd prove you're a lying subverisve faggot (which is pretty evident already).
You won. Congratulations!
fuchs_davis ago
Do you see how disingenuous this is? Whatever his first crack at a comment was, was deleted 1.9 minutes ago and then he replaced it with this. If nobody cared, we wouldn't be having this conversation.
Now, if I may don my tinfoil hat for a moment:
Circa 2016, Media Matters realised how affective this site was becoming and infiltrated. They pull tactics like Two Truths and a Lie. And when you agree to the two truths, that prepares the canvas to paint you as the liar, too.
They saw we were Right Wing. They saw we had an Amalek problem, which we tolerated for the free speech principle. So they amplified his message, two truths and a lie'd it, and when you laughed along and posted your own Amalekian meme, boom! Discredited. Now you don't just tolerate it, it's you. And in the future when you run for Congress, your online trace will be used to disqualify or defeat you.
If you argue against the lie, even if you acknowledge the truths, you will also be preparing the canvas to ruin yourself.
They noticed we had a jailbait problem, which we tolerate for the free speech principle. They virtue signalled against it with two truths and a lie. And when you argued against the lie, boom! Discredited. Now you don't just tolerate it, it's you.
These tactics work. Look how many people have left the site.
I am not afraid of transparency. That's why I don't delete my comment history. I just don't want to give a tool to these subverters to make their job even easier.
Knowing how an individual votes could even help them tailor their propaganda, not just to defame the individual, but even to convert him or her to the cause.
Dismember ago
Who were you talking to and about in this thread? The thread link leads to nothing and all the comments here are deleted.
fuchs_davis ago
this user.
Dismember ago
Alright, thanks. I have to say this user strikes me as familiar somehow in their language but I can't quite pin it yet.
virge ago
Yup. Sock puppet. A 1 month old account I've interacted with maybe 5 times total deciding to use the "I don't delete my post history" troupe is a tried and true subversive tactic used by all the same players.
Thanks, I finally isolated which one you are by the commonality you used in typing. Appreciate the long blurbs, they were helpful.
fuchs_davis ago
See? And now, if I answer his deflection instead of redirecting it back to my thesis, which is that I've been targetted for defamation to mitigate my reasonable critique, he frames the debate.
I guess I should have added "sock puppet" to my list of ad hominem deflections in my last paragraph, there.
virge ago
The difference between us is I am having a conversation with you and you are virtue signaling to an imaginary audience of none.