If there is no hard evidence of doxxing and actual evidence of the threats being carried on then we can't act on it.
This is not minority report we don't act on the supposition or the assumption that someone is going to commit a crime. And yes those are the limitations of the law.
We don't push the idea of the SJWs that someone is guilty until proven innocent and we certainly don't follow the path of finding someone guilty if no real threat has been made.
Again if you guys have clear evidence of it then post it. But the comments made by an online persona that is most than likely mocking you all in his attempts to compromise Voat is not evidence. It can't be circumstantial as that doesn't take foot on a court of law. It has to be hard and concrete evidence.
Sorry but until then all I can do is making sure Voat's main core ideal isn't compromised just because you all are offended and outraged.
view the rest of the comments →
sguevar ago
Nice virtue signalling there. Try to work on your objectivity next.
Octocopter ago
Nice defending calls to violence against children. Try to work on your zealotry blinding you to basic human decency and law.
CerealBrain ago
His pat answer is virtue signalling.
Because, you know, virtue signalling is such a low road compared to defending a pedo under the pretense of free speech.
sguevar ago
If there is no hard evidence of doxxing and actual evidence of the threats being carried on then we can't act on it.
This is not minority report we don't act on the supposition or the assumption that someone is going to commit a crime. And yes those are the limitations of the law.
We don't push the idea of the SJWs that someone is guilty until proven innocent and we certainly don't follow the path of finding someone guilty if no real threat has been made.
Again if you guys have clear evidence of it then post it. But the comments made by an online persona that is most than likely mocking you all in his attempts to compromise Voat is not evidence. It can't be circumstantial as that doesn't take foot on a court of law. It has to be hard and concrete evidence.
Sorry but until then all I can do is making sure Voat's main core ideal isn't compromised just because you all are offended and outraged.