If there is no hard evidence of doxxing and actual evidence of the threats being carried on then we can't act on it.
This is not minority report we don't act on the supposition or the assumption that someone is going to commit a crime. And yes those are the limitations of the law.
We don't push the idea of the SJWs that someone is guilty until proven innocent and we certainly don't follow the path of finding someone guilty if no real threat has been made.
Again if you guys have clear evidence of it then post it. But the comments made by an online persona that is most than likely mocking you all in his attempts to compromise Voat is not evidence. It can't be circumstantial as that doesn't take foot on a court of law. It has to be hard and concrete evidence.
Sorry but until then all I can do is making sure Voat's main core ideal isn't compromised just because you all are offended and outraged.
No need to call you stupid but I do need to rebuke you for using a passage out of context:
Romans 14:16-19 KJV
Let not then your good be evil spoken of. For the kingdom of God is not meat and drink; but righteousness, and peace, and joy in the Holy Ghost. For he that in these things serveth Christ is acceptable to God, and approved of men. Let us therefore follow after the things which make for peace, and things wherewith one may edify another.
My quest if for peace in Voat, to put to rest this whole conflict ignited by an evil doer. If you can't see that then I am sorry but there is really nothing more to say about it.
view the rest of the comments →
sguevar ago
Nice virtue signalling there. Try to work on your objectivity next.
Octocopter ago
Nice defending calls to violence against children. Try to work on your zealotry blinding you to basic human decency and law.
CerealBrain ago
His pat answer is virtue signalling.
Because, you know, virtue signalling is such a low road compared to defending a pedo under the pretense of free speech.
sguevar ago
If there is no hard evidence of doxxing and actual evidence of the threats being carried on then we can't act on it.
This is not minority report we don't act on the supposition or the assumption that someone is going to commit a crime. And yes those are the limitations of the law.
We don't push the idea of the SJWs that someone is guilty until proven innocent and we certainly don't follow the path of finding someone guilty if no real threat has been made.
Again if you guys have clear evidence of it then post it. But the comments made by an online persona that is most than likely mocking you all in his attempts to compromise Voat is not evidence. It can't be circumstantial as that doesn't take foot on a court of law. It has to be hard and concrete evidence.
Sorry but until then all I can do is making sure Voat's main core ideal isn't compromised just because you all are offended and outraged.
Octocopter ago
Not to mention calls to violence are against the law. Of course you cant expect any decency from trash that defend pedos.
CerealBrain ago
Yeah, Now Shizy is gone. The original mods there at G/A are now gone.
sguevar ago
Oh look virtue signalling some more!
Nicely going!
CerealBrain ago
"Let not then your good be evil spoken of."
This is where you err, your defense of Voat is to a degree that you are seemingly siding with degenerates.
Call me stupid, but I'll try to explain it one more time.
sguevar ago
No need to call you stupid but I do need to rebuke you for using a passage out of context:
Romans 14:16-19 KJV
Let not then your good be evil spoken of. For the kingdom of God is not meat and drink; but righteousness, and peace, and joy in the Holy Ghost. For he that in these things serveth Christ is acceptable to God, and approved of men. Let us therefore follow after the things which make for peace, and things wherewith one may edify another.
My quest if for peace in Voat, to put to rest this whole conflict ignited by an evil doer. If you can't see that then I am sorry but there is really nothing more to say about it.
SandHog ago
Who do you think the evil doer is?
sguevar ago
Zyklon_b is just a tool. He serves a purpose. Push us to our limits to test when we'll break and compromise our ideals
If we do not remain true to ourselves the him and his (((handlers))) would have already won.
Hate me all you want but I won't compromise my objectivity for how I feel about the faggot.
And we all need to find a common ground to work on avoiding this shit show happening again.
CerealBrain ago
You'd be surprised.