This is how desperate people are. Have you ever seen the “shit posters” go to such lengths to attack a movement?
Are us Q people a threat to shit posters? Or do real shills hide out in plain site among shit posters, only to become TOXIC, to divide Goats, when the time is right?
They made a new subverse using my pictures they found on other social media platforms
https://voat.co/v/ShitSrayzieSays
Just so you know, I am not the one making comments in that sub. They are manipulating usernames, including mine.
They are even fucking with the css on that new subverse to make it appear that @Shizy is saying stuff about me. That’s what Shizy told me. I haven’t looked at the sub. I have a bunch of people blocked and am sick of the bullshit. I’m just going to spread this link, and if I need to add more later then I will...
I’ve been attacked by shills for over a week because I made the choice to ban users that decide to come shit post on GreatAwakening.
I’ve said for a long time, even on GreatAwakening, that I like shit posting. That’s usually where I shit post about other shit posters. Funny stuff. Not trying to tear whole subverses down.
You can see the submissions of Clitorissa the latest comments were mean and directed at @Gothamgirl. At the time, I didn’t know @Zyklon_b really well. But he was telling me that her and GothamGirl broke up. He said that she was stalking him and telling him she was going to kill herself if he didn’t take her back, and laughing at his ex killing herself. He wanted our help to make her jealous so that she would leave him alone.
He probably came to me because I can’t stand GothamGirl. She accused me of planting child porn on her phone, and I have never even met her. She also accused me of trying to kidnap her kid. Now it makes sense who would have planted child porn in her phone. Zyklon@_b, who she was bringing into her home even tho she had kids...
Screenshots between me and Zyklon_b
Screenshots between me and GothamGirl
Gothamgirl says I planted child porn on her phone...
She attacked me for days. I attacked her back. I was defending myself. I couldn’t believe I was being accused of this. She was even saying I was in the Illuminati.
Someone posted picture of me...
They pinged GothamGirl and said this...
“If you want to know the truth about srayzie then look in her eyes she's a demon”
Gothamgirl replies and said, “I am not shocked. Creepy.”
She uses that as a way to spread rumors about him as well because he saw the lies she was spreading all over pizzagate.
@Trigglypuff likes to send private messages turning people against one another. She even admits she has hundreds of alts.
Isn’t it strange that Zyklon_b didn’t turn against Triggly after reading everything she said about him? This person wasn’t pleased, but certainly not angry.
All I’ve asked of these people is to leave us alone. Think whatever you want about me. I’m just trying to run a subverse and want it protected. It’s been a constant fight because shill groups want to shut us up and they are making coordinated attacks.
Now they are spreading rumors that I’m having an affair with @Kevdude. This is pathetic. So, I will just spread this so people can at least see there’s another side to the story.
Here, Zyklon is talking to someone else about GothamGirl.
WHO ARE THE DIVIDERS? WAKE UP!
view the rest of the comments →
srayzie ago
I want my pictures removed
@Cynabuns
zyklon_b ago
No
theoldones ago
zyklon
when @Crensh did his expose on your ass i fully expected you to get nasty and do some dumb
doxxing a user, who didnt like your "shitposting", because that meant you couldn't shitpost crosses several lines actually breaks doxxing rules.
everyone involved in this news sub can and should be punished.
C_Corax ago
Doxing is posting actual personal information not otherwise publicly available. As in home address or other personal details. These aren't photos lifted out of some private folder, they have been very much publicly available the whole time under the same user name directly tied to the Voat identity.
theoldones ago
the user has requested deletion, and the content right rests with them, not you.
ooberlu ago
You need to double check that statement. This is directly from Voat's User Agreement:
~
Content
You retain the rights to your copyrighted content or information that you submit to Voat ("user content") except as described below.
By submitting user content to Voat, you grant us a royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable, non-exclusive, unrestricted, worldwide license to reproduce, prepare derivative works, distribute copies, perform, or publicly display your user content in any medium and for any purpose, including commercial purposes, and to authorize others to do so. You agree that you have the right to submit anything you post, and that your user content does not violate the copyright, trademark, trade secret or any other personal or proprietary right of any other party. We take no responsibility for, we do not expressly or implicitly endorse, and we do not assume any liability for any user content submitted by you to Voat.
~
A question that is germane to this discussion: did she submit those photos to Voat?
If she submitted these photos to Voat herself, she waived her rights to control of her pics. They now fall under "Fair Use" for copyright laws. More here.
Another question: Did she submit those photos to another site?
If she submitted photos anywhere else online (Twitter, Facebook, etc.) and they were able to get her pics, then she is pretty much SOL. All major social media companies have similar User Agreements and Privacy laws that grant them legal Fair Use over any and all personal information you choose to share with them. The only way to not grant fair use is to not use the sites, not upload any personal data, etc. By using those sites, you agree to the Privacy Policy and User Agreement.
You're trying here, but your arguments tell me you do not know copyright laws in the US nor have read many User Agreements on major websites.
These guys have done nothing illegal by posting her pics and making a satirical subverse if all her information was already freely available online. Their subverse is categorized as satire. Satire is a highly protected form of free speech.
Your trying to make them take it down would be considered censorship of their free speech rights. US law as it is currently written is on their side.
Save your moral outrage for a better fight. This isn't a fight you will ever win on legal grounds.
theoldones ago
1 user just got actually banned.
http://magaimg.net/img/82g5.jpg
https://voat.co/log/banned/user
@Trigglypuff
ooberlu ago
That's unfortunate, then.
Seems Putt does not support free speech, after all.
theoldones ago
SHE JUST ATTEMPTED TO DOXX SOMEONE
she 100% deserved it.
ooberlu ago
How is posting photos that have already been uploaded by the user doxxing? That is not doxxing.
Shizy ago
Those photos were never uploaded by Srayzie here.
ooberlu ago
If that is case and if her photos were not uploaded to Voat, then how were they found?
SmockingGun ago
Shizy aka Srayzie, did you get haxxed? No, you didnt and you liked the pics when people gave you compliments on it so STFU with your whiny argument. Instead of making 72 alts, you should have read Voat’s ToS you fucking pos pedo protecting satanist TRAITOR.