I genuinely don't know how effective it was because oddly his posting style changed not once but twice during our conversation
How is this? I started debating you on a single matter and then you starting throwing tantrums at me. I analyzed the way you replied to @WhiteRonin and saw simply how arrogant you were. Then used your entire responses against you. Which is why on the subject matter that we were talking about, despite your good writing, you didn't know what you were talking about. Which I was correct about.
Since you got called out and then tried to use smirky comments like "Oh this will be funny" or that I was projecting because I called you a cheap customer and arrogant ignorant, this from what you showed on your previous comments to other users and the experience I have as a waiter, you do come by as a "bad pay customer". I could be wrong but the simple dismissive behavior you showed and the constant use of insults towards me was simply a confirmation of such assumptions, that were, again, translated from your previous comments and displayed behavior. Until that point I hadn't even noticed your suspicious account activity.
Now we can go around in circles and you can say that your premise wasn't the one I read about on your previous comments (which it was) nor you hadn't deleted the most of your immature comments full with tantrums then you could prove the one behaving irrationally is me. But you did on a desperate move to avoid showing your childish behavior to others and not come by as the hypocrite I know you are.
The good thing is despite the fact that you tried deleting those comments, in which you even tried poorly to trigger by attacking my faith - which made me laugh in fact or tried to use comments like "you sure look like the kind that needs a psychiatrist, what meds are you on?" then it was clear to me that your next comments will be just a projection of your inability to properly debate my points. I mean you even showed proof of what I argued against you and then contradicted yourself with it. This made you look like a fool to me because you try to talk about things you don't know about as if you knew about them and then got offended because you were called out for it like a foolish kid.
similar to how mine does when I get pretty drunk and decide to shitpost, ergo he has my respect if it was unintentional.
Please do not compare me with a drunk. The matter here remains that the one changing his writing style was you. You stopped using your good use of rhetoric and started going out in tantrums like a child. Which then just left me to reply accordingly. And I didn't even had to use them. Having the respect of a drunk is irrelevant to me because is like having the respect of an addict. Not in my interest whatsoever.
That is the link to our previous debate on which I argued your OP. Your initial reply was simply hilarious, too bad you deleted as the coward I know you are. But from that reply you got quoted on the main premises of your positions including the pathetic efforts to offend, as if I was going to be hurt like a desperate liberal (G.G)''
General Soviet-style double-intelligence.
So once again you prove you are a lefty?
I have admitted before that you have a good use of rhetoric but that doesn't hide the fact that your reactions are simply childish. So you may have a good analytical intelligence but it gets simply over shadowed by your child like emotional intelligence - hence the fact that you drink alone in front of a computer. Don't get me wrong I am analyzing through my own experience as a troubled teen which I confirmed to you in here: https://voat.co/v/AskVoat/3056680/16985021
The more I drink, the more Mr. Hyde comes out. It's ultimately no more or less complicated.
And also this quote of you shows that I am right:
I stopped taking things people say on the internet both seriously and also personally in the mid 90's. It's been like sport ever since.
That is in fact a lie because of your reactions and the fact that you sir extended false accusations towards two users with no proof whatsoever and proceeded to delete your immature and childish comebacks. Now I see that those comebacks are not due to the fact that you are in fact a kid, but that you are an emotional kid trapped in a man's body with a drinking problem.
Am I unable to control my emotions, or am I always able to cycle them to make you think you've figured something out?
You have a drinking problem and you resort to tantrums when you are unable to argue anymore. You could presume you are smarter than you really are but you fool no one with your actions: Resort to childish behavior when offended for being called out as you don't know what you are talking about and extending false accusations to others to try to accomodate to your reasoning and not feel desperately defeated. And hence you then stated here that you initially thought that I was SBBH: https://voat.co/v/whatever/3059075/17006599, but got it wrong. I must add though that since I was invited and accepted. Is much like the default comment a nigger does when being called out and says that one is a racist because you called out the nigger like behavior. Or when a (((jew in the letter))) does when calling some one an antisemite for calling them out as well. Is simply a desperate response to try to prove the other one is wrong.
Self taught. Wisdom from experience. Experience from failure. Failure from effort. Effort from curiosity.
I doubt you really have any level of introspection at all due to your drinking problem and childish remarks in our past interactions, I also know you have no effort from curiosity because of the fact that you haven't even shown the proof of the archives you have proving the accusation you extended here: https://voat.co/v/ProtectVoat/3057324/16990650/10#16990650
So in conclusion, to me you are simply full of shit and I don't have a problem calling you out for it. ;)
view the rest of the comments →
sguevar ago
How is this? I started debating you on a single matter and then you starting throwing tantrums at me. I analyzed the way you replied to @WhiteRonin and saw simply how arrogant you were. Then used your entire responses against you. Which is why on the subject matter that we were talking about, despite your good writing, you didn't know what you were talking about. Which I was correct about.
Since you got called out and then tried to use smirky comments like "Oh this will be funny" or that I was projecting because I called you a cheap customer and arrogant ignorant, this from what you showed on your previous comments to other users and the experience I have as a waiter, you do come by as a "bad pay customer". I could be wrong but the simple dismissive behavior you showed and the constant use of insults towards me was simply a confirmation of such assumptions, that were, again, translated from your previous comments and displayed behavior. Until that point I hadn't even noticed your suspicious account activity.
Now we can go around in circles and you can say that your premise wasn't the one I read about on your previous comments (which it was) nor you hadn't deleted the most of your immature comments full with tantrums then you could prove the one behaving irrationally is me. But you did on a desperate move to avoid showing your childish behavior to others and not come by as the hypocrite I know you are.
The good thing is despite the fact that you tried deleting those comments, in which you even tried poorly to trigger by attacking my faith - which made me laugh in fact or tried to use comments like "you sure look like the kind that needs a psychiatrist, what meds are you on?" then it was clear to me that your next comments will be just a projection of your inability to properly debate my points. I mean you even showed proof of what I argued against you and then contradicted yourself with it. This made you look like a fool to me because you try to talk about things you don't know about as if you knew about them and then got offended because you were called out for it like a foolish kid.
Please do not compare me with a drunk. The matter here remains that the one changing his writing style was you. You stopped using your good use of rhetoric and started going out in tantrums like a child. Which then just left me to reply accordingly. And I didn't even had to use them. Having the respect of a drunk is irrelevant to me because is like having the respect of an addict. Not in my interest whatsoever.
Proof: https://voat.co/v/AskVoat/3056680/16984047
That is the link to our previous debate on which I argued your OP. Your initial reply was simply hilarious, too bad you deleted as the coward I know you are. But from that reply you got quoted on the main premises of your positions including the pathetic efforts to offend, as if I was going to be hurt like a desperate liberal (G.G)''
So once again you prove you are a lefty?
I have admitted before that you have a good use of rhetoric but that doesn't hide the fact that your reactions are simply childish. So you may have a good analytical intelligence but it gets simply over shadowed by your child like emotional intelligence - hence the fact that you drink alone in front of a computer. Don't get me wrong I am analyzing through my own experience as a troubled teen which I confirmed to you in here: https://voat.co/v/AskVoat/3056680/16985021
And also this quote of you shows that I am right:
That is in fact a lie because of your reactions and the fact that you sir extended false accusations towards two users with no proof whatsoever and proceeded to delete your immature and childish comebacks. Now I see that those comebacks are not due to the fact that you are in fact a kid, but that you are an emotional kid trapped in a man's body with a drinking problem.
You have a drinking problem and you resort to tantrums when you are unable to argue anymore. You could presume you are smarter than you really are but you fool no one with your actions: Resort to childish behavior when offended for being called out as you don't know what you are talking about and extending false accusations to others to try to accomodate to your reasoning and not feel desperately defeated. And hence you then stated here that you initially thought that I was SBBH: https://voat.co/v/whatever/3059075/17006599, but got it wrong. I must add though that since I was invited and accepted. Is much like the default comment a nigger does when being called out and says that one is a racist because you called out the nigger like behavior. Or when a (((jew in the letter))) does when calling some one an antisemite for calling them out as well. Is simply a desperate response to try to prove the other one is wrong.
I doubt you really have any level of introspection at all due to your drinking problem and childish remarks in our past interactions, I also know you have no effort from curiosity because of the fact that you haven't even shown the proof of the archives you have proving the accusation you extended here: https://voat.co/v/ProtectVoat/3057324/16990650/10#16990650
So in conclusion, to me you are simply full of shit and I don't have a problem calling you out for it. ;)