this is a free speech site. You're being tricked by cartoon spam. go ban shit on reddit, otherwise ignore it or voat it down.

And that rule you are more familiar with than I about being unpopular: that, I mus assume, would be to keep disruptive spammers [like you, given you expertise?] at bay, not a means to silence opinion-- this place is a target to left wing cry babbies who spam as their main weapon.

no one, but no one, calls me a jew

It is unclear. The federal PROTECT act bans ban depictions in cartoons, paintings, sculpture and other art forms that lead the viewer to believe that minors are engaged in sexual situations. At least one individual has been successfully prosecuted under PROTECT by the federal government in 2010 for possession of printed cartoons of a sexual nature depicting children. However, in light of a prior US Supreme Court decision invalidating a similar provision under the Child Pornography Prevention Act of 1996 as overbroad, it is unclear if this provision of the PROTECT act would survive appellate review, or if PROTECT sufficiently limited the ban so as to correct the problems with the previous act. It is likely not worth the risk given that even a good outcome would follow an arrest, possible incarceration awaiting trial, significant attorneys fees, serious reputational harm, and the possible loss of employment. I note that this inquiry raises troubling concerns about the viewer who enjoys such material and the danger that, without proper intervention, this person may progress to clearly illegal real child pornography or worse.

Source :

https://www.avvo.com/legal-answers/is-lolicon-legal-in-the-united-states---lolicon-is-1964684.html

I see you understand 1/2 the dilemma here, now how do you decide which principle to step on while still claiming to be a man or principles ?

It's legally protected by the 1st because of a retarded supreme court, so should Voat say fuck free speech ?

not yet, but i have now.

very interesting.