This post from @youllrememberme starts off with three paragraphs of useless personal information about the user.

The next paragraph, he tells the new refugees to use their votes to remove bad words, but totally is not telling you to brigade. As if anyone really believes him.

This seems like a logical explanation why v/GreatAwakening wasn't the rendezvous point and why Q has never linked to anything there, just look at srayzie & @shizy's comment history. Are those the people we want representing the Q community? BUT.. there's more...

Does he mean users that would say "grab 'em by the pussy"? Or that don't shy away from bad words?

Carebear boomers want to take down the deepstate, but somehow can't deal with bad words? And what, exactly, is it about bad words that will hurt Q's brand? He thinks Q might not like BAD WORDS when he gets to see shit that apparently will cause even the toughest of us to feel sick to our stomachs?

As an alternative, we're supposed to trust censoring mods? Or a BO from 8ch that mods the same censoring mods from Reddit?Censoring is preferred over bad words for Q? REALLY?

I became friends with srayzie on twitter and was included in a group chat with other voat users. In that group chat I got some interesting information. A user was specifically talking to srayzie and asking "her" to look at a message that was sent on voat, but here's what happened.

So someone acted like he was srayzie, and that's evidence that he is? No, you set this up and have absolutely ZERO link from ASolo to Srayzie here. Anyone looking at this for more than a few seconds could figure this out.

http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=1tpmpz&s=9

http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=10pnl74&s=9

Why don't I see that stylish SRAYZI~E on screenshots with srayzie?

And ASolo writes NOTHING LIKE @srayzie.

ASolo:

https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/2416922/12032133 http://archive.is/bFEeM

Find me some parentheses in srayzie's comments that aren't used for smiley faces:

https://voat.co/user/srayzie/comments