38 Thirty. Fucking. Eight. (ProtectVoat)

submitted ago by Crensch

https://i.sli.mg/pQ87gI.png

All from Eugenenix/Antiracist1-80/JesusofNazareth1-77

RANT:

Every single one is of a raving lunatic who cannot, at any resolution, no matter how small, admit he's wrong. There is no discussion here - this website is his soapbox, and anyone engaging him is targeted by his harassment.

I told him I was done responding to him pending either the desire to do so, or some admission on his part that he was wrong - even for something small like trying to use a biologist's opinions to debunk a physicist's book. No dice.

The fact that I'd have to "ignore" more than a hundred usernames just because of this one person is insane. These accounts, with many thousands of downvoats between them, should not be able to post as much as they are able, and they certainly should not be allowed to be accessed or created as easily as it seems they are.

This really becomes an issue when the admins seem to think that fettering our ability to self-regulate with downvoats is more important than username switching to harass legitimate users.

My inbox is flooded with SPAM freakouts of his, and any response to him winds up just becoming another place for him to spew his message. To find legitimate posts, I have to go through many pages of him asserting that his logic holds to things that do not exist in this universe, and in places where the laws of physics break down.

There is nothing I can do to mute this guy. He changes usernames thirty or more times per day. There's a new username every day.

SUGGESTIONS:

Usernames with under 100ccp should not get to ping people.

They should NOT be able to post bullshit right away, get downvoated, and not get muted.

They should be held to some kind of minimum behavioural standard before having the ability to post TEN TIMES in response to the same person without a response FROM that person. Preferably not more than ONCE; not to a post, not to a comment.

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

piratse ago

/u/crensch ..... I just want to join in the fun.

Crensch ago

Gotta use the @ sign to ping. /u/ is just a link to their profile.

piratse ago

Shit..... you win this round @crensch.....

ExpertShitposter ago

How do you thinks @Crensch feels knowing he will burn in hell for his lack of faith?

For real tho @Crensch. What's going on here? Amalek harassing you over atheism and jews? Pls post best messages, i need e-drama.

Crensch ago

I'm not convinced antiracist is Amalek. Antiracist seems to think that philosophers can tell physicists what is and isn't true about reality, that biologists can refute physicists, that his DNA is special because of Jesus... or something, and that some preformulated logic works despite the premises not adhering to reality.

https://www.voat.co/v/SJWHate/1365679

Down at the bottom where SarMegahhwhatever deleted a comment. Antiracist brought him up at some point, and the guy thought he could argue that his religion wasn't a delusion.

Not sure it'll be entertaining, but you're more than welcome to trawl through that.

Crenscheatsshit2 ago

BUT HAVE YOU CONSIDERED TRIANGLE ON SPHERE?!

You run from logic, idiot. You can claim you won when you got your ass handed to you, but you have no evidence of that. I crushed you flawlessly and have a ton of evidence that proves it.

For anyone reading, here's proof that Crensch is a total idiot: http://archive.is/1Sxft

Cowardice and Logic-denial

He runs v/theisthate. I'm giving him a dose of his own medicine. He is unable to defend his worldview because he is unthinking. I've shown this time and time and time again, and he still says I won't admit when I'm wrong.

At no point did destruction of the prime mover argument occur. He is delusional.

Willful Ignorance

I told him I was done responding to him pending either the desire to do so, or some admission on his part that he was wrong - even for something small like trying to use a biologist's opinions to debunk a physicist's book. No dice.

I gave idiot Crensch multiple sources debunking his stupid book. The sources included atheists and physicists. But Crensch is unable to ever admit he is wrong about anything. He is a faithful idiot.

him asserting that his logic holds to things that do not exist in this universe, and in places where the laws of physics break down.

Ahahahaha! Crensch literally DENIES LOGIC in order not to have to think, not only about bizarre things like the Big Bang, but about everyday things like donating to charity. He literally acts like a champion for reason despite having no education in logic and being completely unreasonable.

Make more crying threads baselessly claiming you won.

Maybe if you ... picked up a fucking book once in a while

Ahahahaha!! Crensch has refused to read ANYTHING I've provided him!

Also, No, I won't read about "arguing about gods". There's so little point or usefulness to it, I can't be bothered to waste that kind of time. ~~~ Idiot Crensch

Yeah! Says the guy who runs v/theisthate. Why learn anything about that which you hate, when it's so much easier to hate what you don't understand?!

Illiteracy

Exhibit A that Crensch can't work a dictionary: Soundness

Exhibit B that Crensch can't work a dictionary: Cues

Exhibit C that Crensch can't work a dictionary: Philosophy

Exhibit D that Crensch can't work a dictionary: Deserves

Exhibit E that Crensch can't work a dictionary: Morality

Exhibit F that Crensch can't work a dictionary: Strawman

Exhibit G that Crensch can't work a dictionary: Dialetheism

Exhibit H that Crensch can't work a dictionary: Pragmatism

Exhibit I that Crensch can't work a dictionary: Necessarily

Exhibit J that Crensch can't work a dictionary: Absurd

Exhibit K that Crensch can't work a dictionary: Necessity

Exhibit L that Crensch can't work a dictionary: Claim

Exhibit M that Crensch can't work a dictionary: Knowledge

Crensch ago

Physicists say your god isn't needed. The onus is on you to prove them wrong.

Crensch-denies-logic ago

Okay. I proved them wrong. Your onus is rebuttal. You're incapable. All you've got is a pathetic appeal to authority, baby Crensch.

@bojangles @eagleshigh @SarMegahhikkitha

Crensch ago

Okay. I proved them wrong.

You did no such thing. You swept them under the rug. God is unnecessary, so sayeth the people that study reality, their data, and the predictive models they create from their data.

Crensch-denies-logic ago

Okay. I proved them wrong.

You did no such thing. You swept them under the rug. God is unnecessary, so sayeth the people that study reality, their data, and the predictive models they create from their data.

'Cept for George Ellis, amirite? Bc Crensch thinks reLIEgion is stooopid, George Ellis doesn't study reality.

Okaaaaaaaaay.

Idiot.

@eagleshigh @bojangles @SarMegahhikkitha

Crensch ago

"Do advances in modern physics and cosmology help us address these underlying questions, of why there is something called the universe at all, and why there are things called 'the laws of physics,' and why those laws seem to take the form of quantum mechanics, and why some particular wave function and Hamiltonian? In a word: no. I don't see how they could."

Yeah, he doesn't answer questions he didn't fucking answer, and didn't attempt to answer, and aren't even in the realm of the study of physics. What an awesome masturbatorial diatribe from...

DA DA DAAAAA

MUH CARROLL

Crensch-denies-logic ago

He didn't intend to. He intended to shit on Krauss, and did.

@eagleshigh @bojangles @SarMegahhikkitha

Crensch ago

Reading comprehension fail.

Kraus didn't answer questions he didn't fucking answer, and didn't attempt to answer, and aren't even in the realm of the study of physics.

You really are stupid.

Crensch-no-education ago

@eagleshigh @bojangles @SarMegahhikkitha

Virtual particles are not nothing. The end.

Crensch ago

Virtual particles are not nothing.

Doesn't matter, physicists say your god is unnecessary. Prove them wrong or fail like you've always done.

Crensch-no-education ago

Virtual particles are not nothing.

Doesn't matter, physicists say your god is unnecessary.

George Ellis. Freeman Dyson.

Prove them wrong or fail like you've always done.

  1. Virtual particles are not nothing.

  2. Prime mover proof proves prime mover.

@eagleshigh @bojangles @SarMegahhikkitha

Crensch ago

Prime mover proof proves prime mover.

Your premise requires a reality that doesn't exist. Once again, you fail.

Crensch-no-education ago

Hurf durf p2 faggot bitch.

@eagleshigh @bojangles @SarMegahhikkitha

Virtual particles are not nothing.

Doesn't matter, physicists say your god is unnecessary.

George Ellis. Freeman Dyson.

Prove them wrong or fail like you've always done.

  1. Virtual particles are not nothing.

  2. Prime mover proof proves prime mover.

Crensch ago

Kek. Ellis: "How indeed can you test what existed before the universe existed? You can’t."

His words, in case you want to mince about the complete irrationality of adding a time component to the words. Your god cannot be proven to exist. Failure.

Crensch-no-education ago

How many alleged "proofs of god" do you think there are? Is it anyone's responsibility to refute them?

@eagleshigh @bojangles @SarMegahhikkitha

Sar, FUCK your username.

Crensch ago

How many alleged "proofs of god" do you think there are?

Uhh... countless?

Is it anyone's responsibility to refute them?

No, they're the ones making the claim. They fail at proving a god exists.

Crensch ago

Krauss does not address why the laws of physics exist,

"MUH WHY?!"

Crensch ago

when asked whether Krauss has "solved the mystery of why there is something rather than nothing", noted that the "belief that all of reality can be fully comprehended in terms of physics and the equations of physics is a fantasy

"MUH PHYSICS DONT REAL WITH MUH FEELINGZ"

Crensch-denies-logic ago

@eagleshigh @bojangles @SarMegahhikkitha

"MUH PHYSICS DONT REAL WITH MUH FEELINGZ"

The only one who is being emotional here is you, demonstrating your anger regarding your utter inability to address premises.

Crensch ago

The only one who is being emotional here is you, demonstrating your anger regarding your utter inability to address premises.

Right, because parodying your own emotional outbursts of nothing but caps-locked whining is somehow my achilles heel. I already pointed out that you were projecting. We both know you have a pissyfit when you don't get your way.

Low effort bud, low effort, and disappointing.