Most likely you've clicked on a link that is here because of @thewebofslime, and you are now part of databases he taps to find you and others on this site.
This is someone who has claimed that his cousin is a professor in computer science and that his cousin's father is a lawyer. He has claimed to getting help from them. Yet, he doesn't understand some of the subjects listed below.
If he is not full of shit, it would mean that he is actively tracking Voat users' IRL identities, using multitude of large databases. He seems to have a personal beef with @Vindicator, and likely all of /pizzagate as well.
If he's just LARPing, well, he might just be @hojuruku.
view the rest of the comments →
virge ago
@thewebofslime, a line of inquiry:
How? I asked you this question once and you never responded. These aren't just public, you can't go to their site and get the database. That's valuable data, worth money on various open markets. How did you obtain it?
Please clarify the involvement and assessment of CACI. Is CACI a NGO, or just a CIA front? It smells about as legitimate as USAID. Of course, I could be wrong. Just curious.
@Crensch referral tag is rudimentary website child's play. From a technical perspective I see nothing that merits objection about this. Please illuminate me as to your complaint.
Same observation for "he probably made his own website". I don't see anything malign.
The Vindicator section is not enough corroboration. Unless I missed something, he's making an educated guess on 2 minutes. That's about as accurate as flipping a coin, @webofslime?
I don't see this at all. He never says he uses stolen credentials. He admits to e-mail spamming, yes, but he's e-mail spamming a list of CNN and Government e-mail addresses. He's waging a war against CNN. What's not to like?
@thewebofslime, what is the purpose of @followthemoney, and why separate the accounts?
The vernacular used by the accounts matches.
IF @thewebofslime is @followthemoney, then this has the appearance of a albeit somewhat arrogant over-exaggeration for the aggregate. From a technical perspective, he's right - most peoples passwords have leaked by now and most people use a lot of repeat passwords. A staggering, disgustingly amount of people. It's common modern OpSec to never re-use passwords and to have cypher's or variants because of this.
@crensch, if anything this is sound technical observation and my only complaint is he's not even bothering to educate directly and seems mostly indignant he'd have to. Frankly, I would, too.
@thewebofslime, can you explain the discrepancy? Was this a mistake, assumption, or is something not readily apparent by the logs?
@crensch I see what @thewebofslime is saying here, and calling it "holds criminal/doxxing material" is a large stretch of the imagination.
The guy basically said she doxxed first, so he retaliated. Help me see why this isn't equalization of force to combat a threat.
Corpse_washer ago
He is on a crusade, justifying it with a good cause.
Dont see a problem with that as in my understanding he is using public data to do it, and bloating about having things that is available too if you know where to look is not nice, but understandable. I would never tell anyone what i have. Ever. This suggests emotion, a wanting to be validated without giving actual proof.
I dont see any indication that that has something to do with ip adresses.
I had to look up what thot audit is. Nothing wrong with that. I dont think he can actually connect ip adresses to twatter geolocation. That would suggest government support, as ip adresses change all the time and you cant really point at someone and say "Its you, and i know that because your current ip is the same as that post made 6 months ago!", especially if its a mobile device that changes ip's with every new tower or something like that. Im not technically adept to say its fake, i just deem it unlikely because professionals use other means of identifications than ip.
No proof provided, cant be decided without it.
A crusade, justifying it with a good cause. Again, without proof provided, cant be decided.
Crusade, justifying it with a good cause. Spamming is a grey area that is sometimes legal, sometimes illegal, have to be decided case by case.
Says the crensch, who probably has some dozens of alts.
Well, he is not wrong.
Both archives say deleted by Voat, i dont really know what i am looking at.
Its probably based on freely available data, like a sexoffender list or something, but again, no proof so cant be decided.
Conclusion: drama from both sides.