The day @kevdude lost even more credibility when he doxxed PMs with personal information of srayzie's to WhiteRonin and GothamGirl (PVTantrums)

submitted ago by Crensch

IF those PMs are even legit.

But either way,

GothamGirl claims to be a l33t hacker that got the info via l33t hacking skills.

ProtectVoat mods have a choice to make, since it's obvious how this information was obtained.

@kestrel9 lays out a pretty convincing timeline showing there was basically zero chance the info was obtained by any other means.

Is that not enough? @IMCHAD discovers @GothamGirl has, in her 2.5 year stint here, mentioned that she was a hacker only once before suggesting it was said to make it seem plausible shortly thereafter.

Oh, need more? @GothamGirl then claims to have gotten them from srayzie.

And while all of this is happening, /v/ProtectVoat [O] @kevdude is busy NOT protecting Voat from the dangerous (((hacker))) that (((hacked))) PMs that were sent to him.

But what he DOES say is ask srayzie how she got those as if him saying he would fight fire with fire 10.4 hours ago, then 7.1 hours ago WhiteRonin posts this in his srayzie parody:

... so I did some FaceTime videos with my iPad....

And just over an hour ago GG"hacker" posts a srayzie to kevdude pm she's been sitting on since February

"Ok. But I don't use a computer. I use an IPAD"

There's a lot on WhiteRonin's srayzie parody that sounds like he took it out of the pm GG posted. (like 6 hours before she posted it)

Probably all a coincidence. /s

Edit: HUGE DEVELOPMENT:

@GothamGirl shows how far the PV crew will go to try and cover for @kevdude with a faked PM screenshot. Zyklon/kevdude confirmed in on it all?

Try it for yourself: try to log in as @clamhurtshosewater with any gibberish password.

tl;dcl: Kevdude is butthurt about screenshots showing he is a shady fuck on Voat, uses GothamGirl and WhiteRonin to proxy-dox PMs of a personal nature to everyone as revenge. GothamGirl lies about being a hacker, getting them from srayzie, then from the username originally used to drop srayzie's photos to the PG mod types.

The screenshot is dated yesterday, yet the username is locked for security reasons probably dated to when putt locked alts during the bannings. No reason to believe it was in the last 24h.

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

Gothamgirl ago

You believe anything 🤣😂 glad I wasted your energy super cuck.

https://i.imgur.com/dol6Bnq.png

ESOTERICshade ago

Well i'll be damned. that account https://i.imgur.com/dol6Bnq.png @clamhurtshosewater is the same account srayzie used to send nude pics of herself to @kevdude, @vindicator, and @crensch, and then blamed it on me. That shit was nine months ago and I never knew it until recently. She had them believing I did that in attempt to get her demodded, which is stupid as fuck because it wouldn't have been enough to get her demodded anyway and a retard knows that.

followthemoney ago

And of course, @crensch is being a giant Jew for leaving the part of the story out WHERE @SRAYZIE LEAKED PM FROM @TRIGGLYPUFF doing exactly the same thing he wants everyone to hate @kevdude for.

This goes for the same (((double standard))) rampant in his posting.

Crensch ago

Are you retarded? Honest question.

@trigglypuff­'s PMs had fuck-all to do with her personal, IRL identity. It just showed her bullshit explanations for what's going on that made her look suspicious.

What kevdude is doing is linking a username to who a person is IRL, not just the piece of shit they are on this website.

Do you fuckbags really not delineate between these things?

Srayzie is a whistleblower.

I am a whistleblower.

Kev is just a petty revenge fiend that will do anything to keep his status, including allying himself with shitbags like you.

followthemoney ago

Nobody has proven they are actually who they say they are irl. I have seen zero evidence anyone was actually doxxed.

Either way, for a moderator,your logic is flawed if you have to start with an ad hominem. It means you already admitted you lost the argument but want to steer away from that fact.

I know for a fact @srayzie used someone's likeness but when the same was done to @srayzie pictures, your reaction was opposite.

I know for a fact that srayzie uses alts to harass people. Again, this is okay to you, but not when other people do it.

I know for a fact @srayzie was dishonest about a great ma y things and you backed that disho estoy and you have a double standard.

This means, factually, you are an intellectually dishonest person.

So, take your ad hominems and shove them up your ass.

I would suggest you try an actual conversation for once, instead the bullshit you've been shamelessly spreading around, but we know you don't have a leg to stand on... or would have already.

The entirety of your problems on Voat directly correlate to your lack of ability to communicate effectively where you, instead, choose to spout off as a total dick. You aren't fooling anyone, at this point.

Your whiteknighting, your intellectual dishonesty, your propensity to cherry pick and attempt to try and present evidence without actually presenting what constitutes as evidence. You're worse than a lawyer

Crensch ago

Either way, for a moderator,your logic is flawed if you have to start with an ad hominem.

Horseshit. I based zero of my points off of that. You don't even know the meaning of the fallacy, do you?

This means, factually, you are an intellectually dishonest person.

I know for a fact you presented zero evidence of any of this.

I know for a fact you are capable of delineating between linking personal IRL shit and linking being a fuckbag on Voat.

I know for a fact you're trying so hard to get back into someone's good graces here; it's not really working, is it?

followthemoney ago

Ad hominem = logical fallacy. The fact you won't acknowledge that means you are a useless liar.

I don't need evidence. I'm right you loser.

Crensch ago

Ad hominem = logical fallacy. The fact you won't acknowledge that means you are a useless liar.

You retard. For it to be a logical fallacy, I have to use it as a basis for my argument. Otherwise it is simply invective and has fuck-all to do with logic in the first place.

I don't need evidence. I'm right you loser.

That which can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.

I dont give a fuck about anyone's good graces. Voat is small fucking potatoes.

Voat is where you are spending your time.

followthemoney ago

Voat is where I spend a fraction of my time, considering i mod larger commu ities than you do, elsewhere on the Internet. Nice try. My Twitter page all e gets over 100k impressions per month.

But, again, you have circled around the central point where you fail you address your double standard. Doxxing, brigading and insulting, among other logical fallacies are okay for you and your friends but not for anyone else.

DarkRaven ago

Crensch didn’t get Srayzie tit pics. Why?

He’s either a gay Jew or she is a Jew bitch..

followthemoney ago

Some people just need the promise of tit pics to be controlled.

DarkRaven ago

Always goes like that.