You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

think- ago

Anon to v/QRV - "Mods Vindicator and Srayzie on the Pizzagate sub defending satanist pedophile Michael Aquino. Attacking another Pizzagate Mod think- and she resigns in protest.":

https://voat.co/v/QRV/2926720/ | https://archive.is/bfFjH

I assume that the poster is @youllrememberme, who showed up in no time after I stepped back on the stickied EsotericShade thread. He should maybe have had the grace to ping me, although I'm not interested in his shill drama.

I didn't leave a comment there.

@argosciv: After reading the post today, I wondered whether you might have left comments? Specifically the comments defending Michael Aquino? Just askin'. Thanks.

argosciv ago

I've opted not to reply to you here yet so as not to provoke anger in you, but, since you ask.

I did not. I've nothing to do with posting that submission or any of the comments therein - .

I was alerted to it by someone(good) and the only thing I did in regards to it was archive it and look for timestamps/comments in the ES thread which might indicate who did or might be connected to whoever did post it.

Whoever is behind it, is trying to play both sides and cause good folk to turn on each other(no doubt in my mind that it connects back to YRM and co.) - which is absolutely not something I'm interested in doing.

As I've said, I have no interest in even talking about Aquino, let alone defending him if it's true that he's abused children. The 'konformist' link you posted the other day was worth taking into account and I've taken the time to follow up on a couple of the sources in it, though it's still not something I'm 100% sure on, one way or the other.

think- ago

Ok, thanks for replying. I asked because my suspicion was that M. Aqui. himself was the anonymous writer who commented. I guess he has a google alert, and shows up whenever his name is mentioned in forum posts.

The 'konformist' link you posted the other day was worth taking into account and I've taken the time to follow up on a couple of the sources in it, though it's still not something I'm 100% sure on, one way or the other.

The FBI stopped investigating him at some point, but later an investigator stepped forward, and said the FBI division in question had links to Aquino's Temple of Seth, and this was the reason the investigation (Aquino's role in the Presidio daycare abuse scandal) was closed.

After the FBI closed the investigation, the Army Crime Investigation Division opened a new investigation. They came to the conclusion that there were reasons to assume he is guilty. He was titled (= tagged in the army files) as an offender. He appealed against getting titled, but lost the court case. The Court decided that the investigation of the CID and him getting titled were legit. It stressed that the CID had pointed out that his alibi wasn't convincing.

It found that he lied when he said that nobody called him 'Mickey', like the children had said he was called.

LaVey, the founder of the Church of Satan called him 'Mickey'.

It found that his allegations that the CID was instigated by an anti-Satanist senator wasn't true, because the timeline of events were not like Aquino had pointed them out.

The Court also found that he wrongly accused the pastor-father of one of the girls accusing him (the one that @Vindicator mentioned in his comment) of harassing him via mail.

It also found that Aquino lied about the girls age, in order to make it seem impossible that she was in the daycare centre at the time the CID said she was.

TL;DR: There is an Army Criminal Investigation Division Report that says he has to be seen as a sex offender.

There was a Court that said the CID investigation and their results were legit.

There was a former investigator who stepped forward later and told the FBI that closed the case was compromised.

I'm just sticking to the facts here, not to my personal interpretation.

I will do a post about the case.

@kevdude @Crensch @Vindicator @EricKaliberhall @MolochHunter

srayzie ago

You publicly resigned as a pizzagate mod due to @Argosciv’s becoming a mod of ProtectVoat. Am I correct? Is this all based off of Argosciv’s beliefs in regards to Aquino? If not, I would like clarification. Thanks.

think- ago

You publicly resigned as a pizzagate mod due to @Argosciv’s becoming a mod of ProtectVoat. Am I correct?

No, I didn't. That I resigned had nothing to do with him becoming a mod of v/ProtectVoat in fact. That was a discussion I had with him and @kevdude the day (IIRC) before, and which had already ended.

I wrote in my resignation comment why I resigned in public. You might want to read it again. You asked me why I resigned in public, for some strange reason you insinuated so many things, but somehow ignored what I had actually explained about my resignation.

I resigned because @Vindicator attacked me in public. I had written a PM to him five hours before, saying I pondered to step down, which he ignored, instead he rushed to the thread to defend @argosciv.

I cannot cope with the cognitive dissonance anymore that is caused by seeing people I really cared about defending @argosciv, and acting like he is a normal user like everybody else. This is why I resigned in the first place. I came here to fight pedophilia and Satanism.

It wasn't me who started to discuss this issue in public, it was @Vindicator. I would have preferred to discuss this in PMs. He chose to attack me like that, although I was a close friend and his close fellow mod. I was all in tears when I read his comment. I felt I couldn't mod one minute more, I felt so exhausted.

I pinged a bunch of users because I was serving the community as a mod. They had the right to know that I resigned. And I did it on the thread because I was so tired, and was crying, I wasn't sure I would be ablet to write a post on v/pizzagatemods. And anyway, they should also know why I resigned.

You might have forgiven @argosciv, but I haven't forgotten that he harassed you with Satanic music videos, that he trolled the sub with Satanic music, that he refused to answer whether he is a Satanist when @Shizy asked him twice, that he admits he drinks blood and is into sex magick. That he spread that we all got it wrong when we think Satanism is evil, that it has been all a big misunderstanding, hence his 'Roots of Corruption' series. (Please correct me if I'm wrong with anything I'm saying, @argosciv.) Someone like he doesn't belong on v/pizzagate imo, and in the very least shouldn't be accepted by the mod team.

If I get @Vindicator right, he thinks this is 'just' @argosciv's religion. Well, but we are on a sub investigating Satanic Ritual Abuse. We are discussing the shticks of the Church of Satan, like displaying a statue of Baphomet in public. They too, claim there members aren't into anything nefarious.

And regarding Michael Aquino: He has been discussed here over and over again. If a newbie thinks the allegations against him are not proven: ok. I would have sent him some old posts, and suggested to read them. But that a Satanist, who has been here for two years, says the allegations are 'not proven', although there are the results of the CID investigation, and the Court documents, is a totally different matter. It's like Are_We_Sure saying that the allegations against Hillary 'are not proven'.

And that @Vindicator choose Wikipedia of all websites, to support @argosciv's claim, and then added @argosciv's quote where he said the SRA victims just 'parroted' their abusers - as if SRA victims who broke from Satanist cults are just too stupid to see what he, @agrosciv claims, also made me very angry. There are countless SRA survivors who did research, there are therapists and scholars writing about Ritual Abuse, but he, @argosciv, is the only one who found out the truth? And @Vindicator obviously thinks we should listen to what he says.

I put so much time and effort in modding the sub, I always had your back, and this is the result? I feel very sad.

@Crensch