You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

CerealBrain ago

When am I going to see my unjust ban at BeatlesGayArmy?

You shouldn't have stuck up for Zykfag so much it made you look bad.

sguevar ago

You shouldn't have stuck up for Zykfag so much it made you look bad.

Need proof of this. Please go search for it I am waiting.

CerealBrain ago

What's done is done, and I'm sure Crensch will unban you, but I have no say so.

Tell them to unban me from BeatlesGayFaggotArmy.

sguevar ago

What's done is done,

You can't prove your false claim but I can prove that I didn't defended ZB at all:

https://voat.co/v/SoapboxBanhammer/3248054/18891153 https://voat.co/v/SoapboxBanhammer/3248054/18890783 https://voat.co/v/ProtectVoat/3245033/18859426 https://voat.co/v/ProtectVoat/3244617/18856159

And I can keep going on and on and on. I never defended the faggot I tried to reason with him for a while but then had enough of his bullshit.

Stop slandering me because you don't behave any better than them.

I'm sure Crensch will unban you

I am waiting for him to come to his senses. That remains to be seen but I honestly hope he will.

but I have no say so

I know you don't I just amuse you with replies so you feel relevant and prove how much of a slanderer you are.

Tell them to unban me from BeatlesGayFaggotArmy.

I did. That got you unbanned for about a few mins and then you got banned again. So...

At this point I am defending myself from an unjust and uncalled for ban.

The Owner of this sub and the v/GreatAwakening has deprive me from my right to participate in a discussion that I very well have the right to participate on v/GA and though at the beginning I didn't care much at this point I am interested in showing that his ways are unjust and are only what they are now because of his selfish endeavour. He is not doing it for the good of v/GA he is doing it to avoid dissent and criticism.

CerealBrain ago

my right to participate in a discussion that I very well have the right to participate on v/GA

I hope you get unbanned. But with due respect, exactly what gives you that right? Because you are a voluntary member of an internet forum?

sguevar ago

But with due respect, exactly what gives you that right? Because you are a voluntary member of an internet forum?

Use the searchvoat feature in GA type my user name and look for both posts and comments. You would even be able to see a few in which srayzie and I interacted with more than gracious intent.

My right is that even if I don't trust Q, I never was a divider of that community and defended it many times. I have engaged with that community and have never done any type of shit posting on it.

My only fault and without warning was to proof that srayzie wasn't doxxed by third parties but by her own doing. I can't support making a right with too wrongs and what was done at that time to trigglypuff was unjust. That being said it, I didn't support their attempts to attack and harass srayzie.

This is why I have a right and he took it away by avoiding the fact that he and one of his mods were pursuing a false narrative and with a selfish proposal of power moderation that only worsen things and did not provide a solution.

CerealBrain ago

I hear you, and I agree, sounds like you would be okay, judging by the past.

My point is simply that no one has the 'right' to be allowed in to a private subverse if the owners don't want them isn't that right? Just because it is Voat? Doesn't Voat protect that right?

sguevar ago

My point is simply that no one has the 'right' to be allowed in to a private subverse if the owners don't want them isn't that right? Just because it is Voat? Doesn't Voat protect that right?

So I think you will have to look at the side bar to answer your question.

Apparently it is not longer that users have engaged with the community and posted repeatedly on said community but that it's owner, authoritarian I might add, sees you as a member. So in this case the premise of the sidebar in here is false and also shows the unjust ways he is engaging on.

Plus shouldn't a user that was unjustly banned have a right to appeal to said ban in order to reverse it? I think that various precedents are shown with @PuttItout's previous ban reversals and I am not talking just the recent ones. There have been others.

CerealBrain ago

Sounds like you got caught in the crossfire, collateral damage. Good luck.

sguevar ago

I thank you for your good wishes. But I think that this attempt is futile as the Owner has proven that he will try to crush dissent as he pleases and one of his mod team will support him because it is convenient to him...

PuttitoutIsGone ago

Not only did you not get unbanned, you abandoned your fellow man and are going to hell. Good job.

CerealBrain ago

I don't think he likes you.