Obama cannot count. Probably missed 2 many classes at Columbia, or whatever shells he falsified. Sure knows how to use a TelePrompTer, and what a drama queen.
Unless those tumb images are cached by Twitter and never re-freshed. Maybe that is what Q is telling us. They are pulled from the site, but once cached - stay.
Posted automatically (#115005) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here. (@corrbrick: Click here to suppress your crosslink notifications from @FractalizingIron)
IF, this event was riddled with abnormalities, all of them are logged and accessible from the data base And I mean the original "I can't breathe' event. The People dressed as police that 'whisked' him away were not medical response. Is that not your answer. He was 'grabbed' but white hat or black hat. Its 50-50 guess. If white hats grabbed him, its in the bad actors interest to make this AS BIG AS POSSIBLE. Holey Fook moment. If Floyd, Epstein, Rich, JFK JR are all alive, ruh ruh.
Here is the same image embedded in a tweet from Oct 29, 2019. Twitter is definitely updating the image periodically, and it is most likely the image was NOT posted on May 17th as implied.
Posted automatically (#115006) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here. (@cabalstone: Click here to suppress your crosslink notifications from @FractalizingIron)
Sadly, anons all over the place are saying "oooh, loook, Obama.org posted the Floyd picture BEFORE he was killed!!! Ooooh, Conspiracy!!!!" which simply discredits the Q movement, as far as I can see.
The image of George Floyd may not have been displaying within the "card" when it was first posted on May 17th. Twitter cards display content from the source url via assigned META Tags. These tags are defined by the developers who maintain the source url's site. Twitter checks for them when a url is present within a tweet. ex: twitter:card = summary_large_image tag found. It's likely these tags were updated after Floyd's death on the 25th and are reflected in the old tweet because it's retrieving the latest META Tag information from the source url.
Stop. I'm not trying to deceive, and the twitter thread is wrong. You can literally verify this for yourself. The metatags can remain constant, but the image associated with the tag can change.
That is the picture for "Obama.org" - so Obama.org changed their picture, like changing a logo. Whatever picture represented obama.org on May 17 was on there until obama.org changed the picture.
Not sure if Q 4437 walks this back or not. Any Web coders out there want to weigh in?
def visit_twitter_and_log_in
visit 'https://cards-dev.twitter.com/validator'
find('input.js-username-field').set(ENV['TWITTER_USERNAME'])
find('input.js-password-field').set(ENV['TWITTER_PASSWORD'])
click_on('Log in')
end
def enter_url_and_click_preview(url)
find('input.FormControl').set(url)
click_on('Preview card')
result = has_content?('Page fetched successfully')
visit 'https://cards-dev.twitter.com/validator'
end
end
Looks like two login functions to me. The second one takes a URL as an argument. However, the indentation, and the final 'end' throw off the structure of the snippet.
The tweet is there from May 17th, with an empty space where the photo is in the current version. I suppose that shows GF was not part of the original tweet.
The auto-generated Wordpress URL contains the timestamp: "053020", or 05-30-2020 There is NO way this was posted before Floyd's death. The fact that Q would post this and hint to that is very concerning to me.
Thanks, but not actually helpful. This theory (T&A's) Is very incorrect in a NUMBER of ways.
Mikey, T&A's theory is way too full of holes.
He asserted the article is no longer available,removed by Deep State Trolls (he think Q was targeting). The article is still available. So he's wrong there.
The article actually affirms dynamic linking NOT negates it. Read the article yourself and see. E.g. (quote below)
We get a lot of questions about how we generate these default images dynamically.
The script referenced in the article (also by Q) is used to dynamically update:
There is more to the process than simply generating the image. We also need a cache-busting bot in order to update the card periodically. If we want to show a growing number of comments over time, we cannot wait for Twitter to bust the cache once per week.
The developers reply:
Twitter associates the image with the URL which cannot be changed after it gets tweeted out
Its the URL that cannot be changed, not the image (because the image is dynamically retrieved FROM the Url site.
Hope this helps. It's important to UNDERSTAND rather than just believe, right?
You cannot edit a tweet. You can copy a tweet and repost a revised version of it. It will then have a new time stamp.You can delete a tweet entirely. There are apps like Brizzly that allow you to set a delay of up to 10 minutes in which you can edit a tweet before it posts but after it posts, it cannot be edited. Brizzly also has an autodelete function that will delete your tweet automatically after one day, one week, or one month, and it will let you save your favorite tweets from deletion.
But why do that when you can delete the tweet and start over? What you're talking about takes a lot more time and effort - and since Twitter stores the pics, unnecessary.
Ps. You cannot delete a tweet and start over. The new tweet will be a NEW tweet and have a new publishing date. People want the links to their websites to have the correct CURRENT image, not old ones from 2 weeks back or 2 years back.
This is COMPLETE BS and makes me question what the heck Q is doing.
Why is he posting nonsense and then posting again to try to validate a bad drop with even MORE nonsense?
All the script is doing is going to https://cards-dev.twitter.com/validator and logging you in with your twitter login you previous set in your linux/mac default variables — which you don’t need, since the twitter validator is not password protected.
Then all it does is enter a url (eg https://obama.org) and clicks on a button called “Preview Card” on the page and then prints the message “Page fetched successfully” if it gets a result.
It has nothing to do with historical data. The validator just shows the current preview card for a URL.
That script is a waste of space. All it does is the following, which you can do manually much simpler. You can even look at the script and see this is what it does:
and all you see is the current preview Twitter would show for that URL. The validator is used by content creators to just see the current image and blurb that would be fetched for a URL.
The "Truth and Art TV" thread you linked to is pure nonsense, a guy rambling in circles, trying to "tech speak" but doing a piss poor job of it.
Anyone with basic Twitter experience and/or coding experience knows that the pic link in that tweet is dynamic, ergo the pic will update whenever the pic on the original page is updated.
Other anon above PROVED that the George Floyd pic was NOT present on May 17th using Q's own suggestion with the validator:
sucks. fucking let down. Q and his faggot team needs to show up and actually take this seriously since WE all are. we wait patiently and stand down out of RESPECT for POTUS. fuck the faggot fucking games they're playing. whoever the cuck loser idiot they hired needs to be fired and Q needs to address this obvious fuck up
This means that when you post a link on Twitter, Twitter reads the contents of the link and tries to find images inside the webpage you're linking, and then it saves a copy of it on the Twitter servers. That's the image that you see. the code that was provided indicates that Twitter does not later download a fresh copy of the page. Therefore whatever image you are seeing is what was originally there on the date of the tweet.
Cool, I am in the same boat. All a bit confusing, using logic I think you are right but Q seems to think its real and went to the point of replying. Sit back and enjoy the show?
Two functions having to do with twitter log-in and validation. The first looks like a direct login, the second prompts for a login in when you enter a particular URL. Maybe there is some date stability with one and not the other. Just guessing here.
My question, why, if in fact they did just update the picture and not have it up before his death, remove it so quickly? Why not just put up a statement with the picture saying there was a misunderstanding about the date of the original tweet and the picture/sign with Floyd's likeness. Done, everyone who's brainwashed just says, oh ok, no big deal we get it. Nope they look guilty from the get go. It makes me think Twitter is messing with these timedate stamps and it is in fact an older version than his death.
No, because the pic comes from an EMBEDDED LINK. THe Tweet itself is the same, including date it was published, but it links to a live (current) page, and the current screen shot image (card) for that page is loaded each time the Tweet is loaded.
In other words, published tweet is reloaded, but linked page image is always current.
You cannot change a tweet's picture. You would have to copy the original tweet and attach a new picture. It will have a new timestamp and be a new and different tweet. Then you would have to delete the original tweet entirely if you just want one tweet with the new picture. Again, it will have a new timestamp because it is a new and different tweet.
Dude the picture is a preview photo to obama.com if they change the main photo at obama.com then it automatically changes on the tweet. They didn't upload a picture to the tweet they typed in a link and Twitter updated a preview photo from the site......
Using Twitter Cards, or doing the normal drag and drop? This is 2 different ways to do images, and I'm not familiar at all with the Twitter Cards, but it appears they create dynamic pages where the image on a tweet CAN change. Set me straight if I'm wrong about this.
if the link is just to obama.org is it possible it just loads the cover image of the website or whatever and it got changed more recently than the post?
visit 'https://cards-dev.twitter.com/validator this is used to check additions and pics. You can change info on the webpage yes and it will show todays, if done today date but the image was posted on the 16th to the website Obama.org Mr. Floyd was killed (?) on the 25th of May. That's the way I understand it, If I'm wrong please fill free to correct me.
There is a thread on Twitter explaining it. I'll look for the thread and post, if it is still there.
Yes. Carpe donktum explained it well. The org. Changes their cover photo and anything that tweeted that organization link automatically updates. 8kun called it out right away.
No, the date of the TWEET is May 17. The link itself is always live. If the link target is removed, its blank. if its updated, Twitter loads the current link image.
If you check the Obama.org site one two or three weeks from now, you'll probably see a NEW current photo, and when you check the May 17 tweet, you'll see THAT new image too (if and when Twiffer updates their cache.)
The point is that Q showed us that NSA intercepted O webmaster validation with this picture at May 17. All other dynamic or static discussions do not matter.
That guy has ZERO idea what he is talking about. The very article he quotes explains HOW they do dynamic linking, and HOW the script in question is used to bust/clear the caches so that the NEW images can be show, instead of waiting for Twitter to clean their OWN cache.
Perhaps the most frightening words I have read on QRV or elsewhere. Are you a sheep? Do you read something and just accept it because IT is THE explanation? Read his theory again, analyse it. It's total bunk.
Oh, it's emotionally satisfying for some. "Hey Q just toasted those bastard shills" Yeah, sure. As if Q has any time or interest in toasting deep state shills. That's NOT Q's work. that's anon work.
Can you provide the logic/evidence that the post (which posts, how) shows how NSA intercepts every comm? How then is Q4436 relevant?
I'm open to increasing my understanding, but at this point, my serious concern is how some stupid bogus idea that Obama.org actually posted Floyd's image BEFORE his death became viral among unthinking patriots.
THAT is the image that Twitter accesses because THAT is the image the Obama.org website admin has deisgnated as the current CARD. (the script Q posts shows how Current cards can be checked. )
Moreover, Q4437 affirms that Q KNOWS that images are linked dymanically. The code he references indicates this directly (it's used to dynamically check links and bust or clear the cache of old images). see this article:
4436 is a post to tell bad actors (obama foundation, etc) that Q knows what Obama did with his 2020 Graduation Speech, that 4437 is telling the querying anon that Q KNOWS images are linked dynamically, and therefore a) don't worry and b) that WASN'T the reason we (Q) posted the Obama tweet in 4436, and then 4437 is telling everyone that 4436 was NOT for anons (i.le. suggesting that Obama foundation pre-posted Floyd's pci) but rather for Deep State actors: "We know what you/Obama did"
Time stamp doesn't matter. The picture is dynamic and connected to the organization and will update on past dates. That doesnt mean it isnt a message to someone, but it also means we shouldn't present this to anyone unless we understand the message it represents because right now it makes people think Q fucked up.
Then again there is another link up on voat for 8kun with a better theory. Still...pointing out to normies that the pick was on the 17th is easily debunked and has asshole against K jumping all over it to prove Q is a larp. Needs better fine tuning before we spread its message
NO, I am not a coder but they debunked that aspect on 8kun already. However, they think Q was pointing out something about the source code. This was one theory I saw pasted below. I dont know if that holds either though:
"
I do believe that is Q declassifying how the deep state had been spying on the people.
enter_url_and_click_preview
is a method within
visit_twitter_and_log_in
Twitter method has some sort of logical control over a classification of URL actions (web browsing).
But then the question I would have is
If enter_url_and_click_preview is a method of visit_twitter_and_log_in, what if anything makes visit_twitter_and_log_in a method, and what are the other defs in the same level as visit_twitter_and_log_in?
If this is but a snippet of the entire code…
What if the full code shows other social media sites…
With this structure, this to me looks like a snippet of Python (in metaphor but structure is there) code that is a WIDE_SCOPE connection to say the least!
Q 'hacked' 'big social media'?
Are we witnessing a worldwide start of open source Q-class coding in free space?
We can answer each other's queries without needing to see a person's entire digital signature."
Thats for sure. Hubs is in the absolute proof or I am gonna make fun of you crowd even though he follows it with me. He jumped all over this and carpe donktums reply wrecking the original proof circulating on twitter.
I don't know the original or if what we are looking at is genuine to begin with. Haven't had the time to research yet. I have seen MANY altered tweets being passed here.
And I think that's exactly what manipulators rely on. I would say a good 20 to 30% of what is passed around as proofs and facts are manipulations and untrue. I have found many but I don't even bring it up anymore because oh, well you know why.
I have found manipulated tweets being used as proofs even. I get upset because I feel like people release them and no one bothers to research them or validate them and then if I bring it up I get attacked by my own people.
Yes exactly. Lot of folks if they see something they're interested in, go to research it and find out its fake will never look no further into the movement.
I posted (retweeted) a article a while back and days later the original pic was replaced. Don't know exactly by who but the article was still there, and the timestamp of my posting didn't change. Just throwing this out there.
I reacted too quickly to the controversy that was surrounding all the discussion over the date-timestamp of the linked tweet
Here's my latest perspective (which is actually what my initial perspective was because I didn't first notice the May 17th date-timestamp when I went to look at the tweet):
Someone on the thread explains the photo away with this:
To those of you who are asking why George is on the link photo. It’s a link photo, it can change at any time.. think about it, you link google if googles cover changes the link cover changes
Of course, that's not proof. They can assign any name they want. But the fact that the Tweet was posted on May 17 and that the linked image is NOW Floyd is also NOT proof that that image was the one posted on May 17 at Obama.org. it just isn't?
Here's an analogy. On January 12, 2017, You establish a direct line to the White House Oval Office. That direct line is now fixed (tweet). It is connected to the White House. It will ALWAYS connect you to the White House Oval Office.
If you use the phone on January 15th, You use the phone and who's voice do you hear? Hussain's voice.
Then, you use the phone on January 25th, who's voice do you hear? D. J. Trumps.
each time you start your computer (or phone) and load your twitter program, the tweets appear. If the tweet has an embedded link to another website or video, etc, it 'calls' the website or video. If the article is still there, no problem. If the video is there, no problem. If NOT, then you'll see something DIFFERENT to what you saw when they WERE there. Likewise, if the linked site uses a NEW image, THAT new image will appear in the tweet. It's not rocket science, right?
If you phone the Oval office on Jan 25 and you hear Trumps voice and you therefore conclude, hey, Trump must have been in the Oval Office on Jan 12th when I installed the phone line, you would be wrong.
That said- media has been used against us my entire life. What if white hats are using media to wake the population up- who says they aren't creating fake news to do so. The recent scary news could possibly contain fake stories.
cabalstone ago
I stand humbled and corrected. https://twitter.com/TruthandArtTV1/status/1269461735037001728
corrbrick ago
Not so fast @cabalstone, Bernie's update basically says "never mind" and that he doesn't know what's what, here.
cabalstone ago
Ok, but...ok, but...ok, but...ok, but...
Damn. Loopin' again. LOL!
Reconcile.
Lyonessrising ago
"Twitter associates the pictures w the url and cannot be changed after posting."
All comments not meant for anons.
Q is trolling the shills on kun..
That's why.
TheRealIndianaJoe ago
It will shock me just because it finally happened.
spottedstriper ago
Big whiff on this one
Stephenheard2008 ago
Obama cannot count. Probably missed 2 many classes at Columbia, or whatever shells he falsified. Sure knows how to use a TelePrompTer, and what a drama queen.
ALIENS2222 ago
corrbrick ago
Interesting analysis by Bernie, which he seems to back off a bit in his last post. Hmm.
Murphman64 ago
https://twitter.com/TruthandArtTV1/status/1269461735037001728
corrbrick ago
Thanks, I just saw this. Bernie seems to back off of his analysis a bit in his last post.
RecceRat ago
Just seen this ^^^^^ ;)
Roger the frog.
devnulll ago
Unless those tumb images are cached by Twitter and never re-freshed. Maybe that is what Q is telling us. They are pulled from the site, but once cached - stay.
Christosgnosis ago
I first looked at this tweet and didn't even pay attention to the date-timestamp on it
I was seeing this as Obama trying to position himself as bigger in the eyes of all these 2020 graduating kids than is Pres. Trump
Seemed like Obama just doing more of inflating his shadow presidency
Then I caught onto the date-timestamp thing
And then I saw there is controversy because the image could be changed at the web page where it resides
But then Q followed with the drop where Anon said it needed to be retracted and Q posted the code snippet (which doesn't really establish anything)
And then Q posted the drop that says not all drops are for anons - which just sounds like a lame excuse
corrbrick ago
Yeah, a lot of apparent back and forth on this one.
SearchVoatBot ago
This submission was linked from this v/GreatAwakening submission by @FractalizingIron.
Posted automatically (#115005) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here. (@corrbrick: Click here to suppress your crosslink notifications from @FractalizingIron)
Fresh-Oxygen ago
Puppet Obama was really a waste of time and a bringer of misery for so mush people.
I wrote this on QRV: perhaps that I will got more chances inthis place.
It is just certain observations and I am intriguated by what VOAT think about it and help me to modify what could be wrong:
https://voat.co/v/QRV/3862011
Thanks for tour help patriots.
I am already downvoated and attack by the shills, so I have surely post some good things, I think.
sheepdoggie ago
IF, this event was riddled with abnormalities, all of them are logged and accessible from the data base And I mean the original "I can't breathe' event. The People dressed as police that 'whisked' him away were not medical response. Is that not your answer. He was 'grabbed' but white hat or black hat. Its 50-50 guess. If white hats grabbed him, its in the bad actors interest to make this AS BIG AS POSSIBLE. Holey Fook moment. If Floyd, Epstein, Rich, JFK JR are all alive, ruh ruh.
In_Cog_Nito ago
Here is the same image embedded in a tweet from Oct 29, 2019. Twitter is definitely updating the image periodically, and it is most likely the image was NOT posted on May 17th as implied.
https://twitter.com/ObamaFoundation/status/1189209929799864320
cabalstone ago
Clarification.
FOR THOSE SEEKING
CLARITY ON LAST Q
LINKS LOAD DYNAMICALLY
SO ANY LINK TO OBAMA ORG
SHOWS A GEORGE FLOYD
PICTURE - NO MATTER
WHEN POSTED
BIGGER POINT
MESSAGE SENT
TO A BAD ACTOR
IS WE KNOW RENEGADE
SIGNALLED DURING
COMMENCEMENT
THAT STAGE WAS
SET FOR AN EVENT
cabalstone ago
Update: I stand humbled and corrected. Details here.
robertdebruce ago
set for an event that had not happen yet.
jbo5112 ago
The original preview for the Tweet
https://files.catbox.moe/xqyk3p.jpg
cabalstone ago
Thanks!
SearchVoatBot ago
This comment was linked from this v/GreatAwakening submission by @FractalizingIron.
Posted automatically (#115006) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here. (@cabalstone: Click here to suppress your crosslink notifications from @FractalizingIron)
FractalizingIron ago
Not THAT makes sense.
Sadly, anons all over the place are saying "oooh, loook, Obama.org posted the Floyd picture BEFORE he was killed!!! Ooooh, Conspiracy!!!!" which simply discredits the Q movement, as far as I can see.
robertdebruce ago
of course you see it that way. lol
FractalizingIron ago
of course? Weird comment.
beerandwings ago
The image of George Floyd may not have been displaying within the "card" when it was first posted on May 17th. Twitter cards display content from the source url via assigned META Tags. These tags are defined by the developers who maintain the source url's site. Twitter checks for them when a url is present within a tweet. ex: twitter:card = summary_large_image tag found. It's likely these tags were updated after Floyd's death on the 25th and are reflected in the old tweet because it's retrieving the latest META Tag information from the source url.
https://cards-dev.twitter.com/validator
* Paste Card url https://www.obama.org/
* Preview Card
* Observe log info regarding META Tags
robertdebruce ago
again meta tags, you have to know what your meta tag is about if, mr floyd was alive why didn't they use a current pic on the 17th?
beerandwings ago
Stop. I'm not trying to deceive, and the twitter thread is wrong. You can literally verify this for yourself. The metatags can remain constant, but the image associated with the tag can change.
Q already stated, "Not all posts are meant for Anons." We do not have enough information to decode the significance of this.
corrbrick ago
Thanks for decoding this for us (and dousing me with cold water). Oh well, back to trusting the plan...
Nachose ago
That is the picture for "Obama.org" - so Obama.org changed their picture, like changing a logo. Whatever picture represented obama.org on May 17 was on there until obama.org changed the picture.
Cloudrdr ago
why indeed would the O foundation change the picture at all? And to that in particular if not bring attention to it?
confusing.
oh well everything in its time.
corrbrick ago
So, much ado about nothing. Wonder what Q was trying to tell us?
telleveryoneyouknow ago
sell us
corrbrick ago
Not sure if Q 4437 walks this back or not. Any Web coders out there want to weigh in?
Looks like two login functions to me. The second one takes a URL as an argument. However, the indentation, and the final 'end' throw off the structure of the snippet.
moderator99 ago
One too many ends.
smacl61 ago
Prove it with the wayback machine.
corrbrick ago
The tweet is there from May 17th, with an empty space where the photo is in the current version. I suppose that shows GF was not part of the original tweet.
corrbrick ago
Good idea.
Qdini ago
Wake up everyone you know. Share this link!!!
RedZorp ago
Do NOT share this link.
False alarm as has been noted above.
MudPuddlePie ago
Very interesting...
MuhMueller ago
Holy sheiiit.
corrbrick ago
Here's some thoughts on GF being the first arrest that I saw right before Q post 4436.
hildberht ago
Can guarantee you there is no chance he is alive, ZERO. They are stupid but not that stupid.
pizzaequalspedo ago
The only way he’d be alive is if he’s a double agent and some infiltrated good guys grabbed him
corrbrick ago
That's what I thought at first. Then I saw this Q post, which set the "what if?" wheels in motion. Now you want to bring me back down to earth...
hildberht ago
We need. To keep it real. Seth rich, Epstein and now Floyd can’t all be alive as speculated from time to time.
moderator99 ago
Not Seth Rich.
That you throw him in there is the only reason your statement is true.
brettco12 ago
I think they all are. I would bet on it.
BigTrucker ago
They can change these pics at will. Good lord people.
Specific_Fox ago
WRONG. If you want to change the picture on a tweet, you have to delete the tweet and start over. Same if you want to change text. Delete. Start over.
Covfefeandeggs ago
People downvoting you don’t care about truth. I bet they think they aren’t sheep.
Letthepiecesfall17 ago
If there's any doubt here, please look at the source code of obama.org, where there is an auto-generated URL for the image:
/wp-content/uploads/053020_GeorgeFloyd_Protests_Chicago_IL_CD_1588-scaled.jpg
The auto-generated Wordpress URL contains the timestamp: "053020", or 05-30-2020 There is NO way this was posted before Floyd's death. The fact that Q would post this and hint to that is very concerning to me.
ALIENS2222 ago
Lyonessrising ago
Not on a published tweet.
Theres a reason Q pointed it out .
FractalizingIron ago
There may be a reason Q pointed it out, but it's NOT because this image was preloaded on May 17. That's not how Twitter works. (Embedded links)
Lyonessrising ago
https://mobile.twitter.com/TruthandArtTV1/status/1269461735037001728
FractalizingIron ago
Thanks, but not actually helpful. This theory (T&A's) Is very incorrect in a NUMBER of ways.
Mikey, T&A's theory is way too full of holes.
https://dev.to/ben/how-devto-dynamically-generates-social-images--2c2n
The developers reply:
Its the URL that cannot be changed, not the image (because the image is dynamically retrieved FROM the Url site.
Hope this helps. It's important to UNDERSTAND rather than just believe, right?
LoveOurCountry ago
You cannot edit a tweet. You can copy a tweet and repost a revised version of it. It will then have a new time stamp.You can delete a tweet entirely. There are apps like Brizzly that allow you to set a delay of up to 10 minutes in which you can edit a tweet before it posts but after it posts, it cannot be edited. Brizzly also has an autodelete function that will delete your tweet automatically after one day, one week, or one month, and it will let you save your favorite tweets from deletion.
FractalizingIron ago
Read above.
The tweet EMBEDS a link. Each time Twitter loads that Tweet, with its permenant time stamp, it also loads the link (which is alive).
It's basic html. Have you ever seen a link to a video deleted on Ytub? Same old screenshot? no. New (blank) deleted screenshot.
It's basic link programming.
Specific_Fox ago
But why do that when you can delete the tweet and start over? What you're talking about takes a lot more time and effort - and since Twitter stores the pics, unnecessary.
FractalizingIron ago
Do you understand how embedded objects, hypoerlinking etc work?
Twiff retrieves the called images, stores them in their own cache, then clears the cache periodically.
The script Q posted is often used by programmers to update the correct CURRENT image instead of waiting to Twffer to do it.
Twiff does NOT store the images permenantly. The URL is fixed, but the sub-Url images are not.
https://dev.to/ben/how-devto-dynamically-generates-social-images--2c2n
Ps. You cannot delete a tweet and start over. The new tweet will be a NEW tweet and have a new publishing date. People want the links to their websites to have the correct CURRENT image, not old ones from 2 weeks back or 2 years back.
Specific_Fox ago
The more you holler about it the more I think we're over the target.
FractalizingIron ago
Fine. Each must decide according to his conscience and best judgment. I have no issue with that.
I think we'll see. Can I suggest you recheck the tweet in 3 or 4 weeks time, and see who's right?
Have a great day.
hildberht ago
Q has responded to a comment of this type with some technical stuff, beyond me.
def visit_twitter_and_log_in
visit 'https://cards-dev.twitter.com/validator'📁
find('input.js-username-field').set(ENV['TWITTER_USERNAME'])
find('input.js-password-field').set(ENV['TWITTER_PASSWORD'])
click_on('Log in')
end
def enter_url_and_click_preview(url)
find('input.FormControl').set(url)
click_on('Preview card')
result = has_content?('Page fetched successfully')
visit 'https://cards-dev.twitter.com/validator'📁
end
end
Q
36963 ago
find('input.js-username-field').set(ENV['TWITTER_USERNAME'])
find('input.js-password-field').set(ENV['TWITTER_PASSWORD'])
1) Say you are O web admin -you use your own user/password
2) May 17 - you prepared the picture and post and you want to validate how your post will look like
3) NSA is tapping every internet culture comm on level 0.
RedZorp ago
This is COMPLETE BS and makes me question what the heck Q is doing.
Why is he posting nonsense and then posting again to try to validate a bad drop with even MORE nonsense?
All the script is doing is going to https://cards-dev.twitter.com/validator and logging you in with your twitter login you previous set in your linux/mac default variables — which you don’t need, since the twitter validator is not password protected.
Then all it does is enter a url (eg https://obama.org) and clicks on a button called “Preview Card” on the page and then prints the message “Page fetched successfully” if it gets a result.
It has nothing to do with historical data. The validator just shows the current preview card for a URL.
That script is a waste of space. All it does is the following, which you can do manually much simpler. You can even look at the script and see this is what it does:
1- Go to https://cards-dev.twitter.com/validator
2- Enter https://obama.org in the Card URL box.
3- Click “Preview Card”
and all you see is the current preview Twitter would show for that URL. The validator is used by content creators to just see the current image and blurb that would be fetched for a URL.
jbo5112 ago
You go to Twitter's card validator: https://cards-dev.twitter.com/validator
Look up an obama.org archive from the tweet's date: https://web.archive.org/web/20200517224631/https://www.obama.org/
You get: https://files.catbox.moe/xqyk3p.jpg
Thanks!
ALIENS2222 ago
RedZorp ago
Are you serious?
The "Truth and Art TV" thread you linked to is pure nonsense, a guy rambling in circles, trying to "tech speak" but doing a piss poor job of it.
Anyone with basic Twitter experience and/or coding experience knows that the pic link in that tweet is dynamic, ergo the pic will update whenever the pic on the original page is updated.
Other anon above PROVED that the George Floyd pic was NOT present on May 17th using Q's own suggestion with the validator:
You go to Twitter's card validator: https://cards-dev.twitter.com/validator
Look up an obama.org archive from the tweet's date: https://web.archive.org/web/20200517224631/https://www.obama.org/
You get: https://files.catbox.moe/xqyk3p.jpgJPG
In other words, Q screwed up (in an amateur fashion, btw) and no amount of spin from desperate followers can change that.
hildberht ago
Thanks, one response saying he is right, another (your's) saying it is wrong. Lol this is all too fucking hard.
RedZorp ago
He is WRONG.
The validator does NOT show historical pictures/data but just grabs the current one.
Of course Q has plausible deniability here because all he is doing is posting some pseudo code.
On the other hand, Q did post that code as supposed "proof" in response to an anon asking him to walk the drop back.
So it does stink, unfortunately, and makes me question WTF Q team is up to.
hildberht ago
Hacked comms?
telleveryoneyouknow ago
sucks. fucking let down. Q and his faggot team needs to show up and actually take this seriously since WE all are. we wait patiently and stand down out of RESPECT for POTUS. fuck the faggot fucking games they're playing. whoever the cuck loser idiot they hired needs to be fired and Q needs to address this obvious fuck up
moderator99 ago
It's a high-level programming language like Java or Python.
StormRanger ago
Q also states not all coms are for anons.
Christosgnosis ago
that just sounds like a dodge where there Q4436 was a complete fuck-up, though
sixsicsix ago
This means that the content is scraped by Twitter upon posting. It is not later scraped again.
hildberht ago
Can you elaborate for the non literate. I am sorry I don't understand what you describe.
sixsicsix ago
This means that when you post a link on Twitter, Twitter reads the contents of the link and tries to find images inside the webpage you're linking, and then it saves a copy of it on the Twitter servers. That's the image that you see. the code that was provided indicates that Twitter does not later download a fresh copy of the page. Therefore whatever image you are seeing is what was originally there on the date of the tweet.
FractalizingIron ago
Thanks. But is that permanent? How long does the image (cached) last?
sixsicsix ago
You know what, I'm not really sure. I don't use Twitter. I may in fact be incorrect here, they might indeed refresh the thumbnail... Hmm.
FractalizingIron ago
Trying to dig more on this.
one theory says that Qdrop 4437 was not for anons but for deep state trolls.
Can't say this makes sense to me. (seems like the evidence actually points to current card retrieval, but don't know) Does Q have to go after trolls?
https://twitter.com/TruthandArtTV1/status/1269461735037001728
Based on a comment from cabalstone, I've tried another explanation, tho non-technical with regards to the coding aspect. (that needs more research).
https://voat.co/v/GreatAwakening/3862100
Thanks for your comment.
hildberht ago
Thank you, so they knew in advance. Hmmmm
endernug ago
What language uses "end" for function declarations? This seems kinda dumb to me. Also, environment variables for username and password?
sixsicsix ago
It's pseudocode.
BigTrucker ago
I don't know what it means.
hildberht ago
Cool, I am in the same boat. All a bit confusing, using logic I think you are right but Q seems to think its real and went to the point of replying. Sit back and enjoy the show?
BigTrucker ago
I take the good and leave the bad when it comes to this movement and just like everything else in life both live within it.
corrbrick ago
Two functions having to do with twitter log-in and validation. The first looks like a direct login, the second prompts for a login in when you enter a particular URL. Maybe there is some date stability with one and not the other. Just guessing here.
angelCole ago
My question, why, if in fact they did just update the picture and not have it up before his death, remove it so quickly? Why not just put up a statement with the picture saying there was a misunderstanding about the date of the original tweet and the picture/sign with Floyd's likeness. Done, everyone who's brainwashed just says, oh ok, no big deal we get it. Nope they look guilty from the get go. It makes me think Twitter is messing with these timedate stamps and it is in fact an older version than his death.
corrbrick ago
You certainly raise a lot of good questions @angelCole. It does indeed have all the earmarks of a cover up.
hildberht ago
OK, I am sure someone will know.
Odd to see Q respond so quickly to an attempted correction to the drop. Maybe planted, lol.
corrbrick ago
If a tweet's picture is changed, would that not also update the timestamp? Asking for someone who has never used twitter.
jbo5112 ago
It's grabbing a picture from the website. As the website changes, the preview changes.
Go to Twitter's card validator: https://cards-dev.twitter.com/validator
Look up an obama.org archive from the tweet's date: https://web.archive.org/web/20200517224631/https://www.obama.org/
You get a tweet that originally showed: https://files.catbox.moe/xqyk3p.jpg
FractalizingIron ago
No, because the pic comes from an EMBEDDED LINK. THe Tweet itself is the same, including date it was published, but it links to a live (current) page, and the current screen shot image (card) for that page is loaded each time the Tweet is loaded.
In other words, published tweet is reloaded, but linked page image is always current.
Specific_Fox ago
That's a ridiculous amount of work. It's easier to delete/repost the tweet. No moron's going to do what you suggested.
FractalizingIron ago
OMG. You really have ZERo idea how the internet works?
Don;t you realize that EVERYTIME you boot your computer and browse a website, the browser UPDATES the website content provided to it?
Please. Please. You have zero idea what you are talking about.
https://dev.to/ben/how-devto-dynamically-generates-social-images--2c2n
Specific_Fox ago
Stop being a jerk. That's not the way Twitter works. It's not the same thing so stop comparing them.
FractalizingIron ago
PS. Fox, have a read of this thread. You might learn a bit about how this all works.
just a suggestion.
https://voat.co/v/QRV/3862721
FractalizingIron ago
Actually, it's exactly how it works.
Have a nice day.
LoveOurCountry ago
You cannot change a tweet's picture. You would have to copy the original tweet and attach a new picture. It will have a new timestamp and be a new and different tweet. Then you would have to delete the original tweet entirely if you just want one tweet with the new picture. Again, it will have a new timestamp because it is a new and different tweet.
Fateswebb ago
Dude the picture is a preview photo to obama.com if they change the main photo at obama.com then it automatically changes on the tweet. They didn't upload a picture to the tweet they typed in a link and Twitter updated a preview photo from the site......
robertdebruce ago
That's how we have to do it. however those that code know how. The following is from Q on 8kun
def visit_twitter_and_log_in
visit 'https://cards-dev.twitter.com/validator'📁
find('input.js-username-field').set(ENV['TWITTER_USERNAME'])
find('input.js-password-field').set(ENV['TWITTER_PASSWORD'])
click_on('Log in')
end
def enter_url_and_click_preview(url)
find('input.FormControl').set(url)
click_on('Preview card')
result = has_content?('Page fetched successfully')
visit 'https://cards-dev.twitter.com/validator'📁
end
end
Q
BTW this also lets you and I know that Q has the ID & password to twitter and probably Obama.org. websites. lol
satisfyinghump ago
it's NOT an UPLOADED photo to a twitter message. it's a LINK to a photo on a remote server.
late2thegame ago
Using Twitter Cards, or doing the normal drag and drop? This is 2 different ways to do images, and I'm not familiar at all with the Twitter Cards, but it appears they create dynamic pages where the image on a tweet CAN change. Set me straight if I'm wrong about this.
redstarkachina ago
if the link is just to obama.org is it possible it just loads the cover image of the website or whatever and it got changed more recently than the post?
robertdebruce ago
visit 'https://cards-dev.twitter.com/validator this is used to check additions and pics. You can change info on the webpage yes and it will show todays, if done today date but the image was posted on the 16th to the website Obama.org Mr. Floyd was killed (?) on the 25th of May. That's the way I understand it, If I'm wrong please fill free to correct me.
There is a thread on Twitter explaining it. I'll look for the thread and post, if it is still there.
FractalizingIron ago
Exactly. It loads the current image for the LINK. It's NOT an image in the tweet itself.
basic HTML.
UnbreakablePatriot ago
Yes. Carpe donktum explained it well. The org. Changes their cover photo and anything that tweeted that organization link automatically updates. 8kun called it out right away.
36963 ago
May 17 is the date on the link
FractalizingIron ago
No, the date of the TWEET is May 17. The link itself is always live. If the link target is removed, its blank. if its updated, Twitter loads the current link image.
36963 ago
It is not dynamic and here is explanation
https://mobile.twitter.com/TruthandArtTV1/status/1269461735037001728
FractalizingIron ago
PS. Here is an archived copy of Obama.org on May 17.
https://web.archive.org/web/20200517224631/https://www.obama.org/
here is the code.
view-source:https://web.archive.org/web/20200517224631/https://www.obama.org/
Can you find the floyd image (053020_GeorgeFloyd_Protests_Chicago_IL_CD_1588-scaled.jpg) anywhere here? No.
If you saw the Obama.org tweet (May 17) on May 17 (up until May 30, probs) you would see this:
https://www.obama.org/wp-content/uploads/M1Hi_j0246-copy-scaled-e1588695935923.jpg
The image name is M1Hi_j0246-copy-scaled-e1588695935923.jpg
Here is an archive of Obama.org on June 1.
https://web.archive.org/web/20200601092747/https://www.obama.org/
Here is the code:
view-source:https://web.archive.org/web/20200601092747/https://www.obama.org/
You will see that the Floyd Image is NOT current.
https://www.obama.org/wp-content/uploads/053020_GeorgeFloyd_Protests_Chicago_IL_CD_1588-scaled.jpg
If you check the Obama.org site one two or three weeks from now, you'll probably see a NEW current photo, and when you check the May 17 tweet, you'll see THAT new image too (if and when Twiffer updates their cache.)
Hope that helps.
36963 ago
The point is that Q showed us that NSA intercepted O webmaster validation with this picture at May 17. All other dynamic or static discussions do not matter.
FractalizingIron ago
Why are you posting T&A's bogus nonsense? It makes no sense, and contradicts itself.
The script Q posts is one method used by programmers to force update the image in the cache before Twiffer does.
https://dev.to/ben/how-devto-dynamically-generates-social-images--2c2n
36963 ago
Validate , big difference.
36963 ago
https://voat.co/v/QRV/3862644
36963 ago
To validate a post .
FractalizingIron ago
That guy has ZERO idea what he is talking about. The very article he quotes explains HOW they do dynamic linking, and HOW the script in question is used to bust/clear the caches so that the NEW images can be show, instead of waiting for Twitter to clean their OWN cache.
https://dev.to/ben/how-devto-dynamically-generates-social-images--2c2n
**"here is explanation" **
Perhaps the most frightening words I have read on QRV or elsewhere. Are you a sheep? Do you read something and just accept it because IT is THE explanation? Read his theory again, analyse it. It's total bunk.
Oh, it's emotionally satisfying for some. "Hey Q just toasted those bastard shills" Yeah, sure. As if Q has any time or interest in toasting deep state shills. That's NOT Q's work. that's anon work.
Please. Let's APPLY Q's methodologies. Logical thinking, expanded thinking, critical thinking.
36963 ago
Simple explanation - Q posts shows how NSA intercepts every comm. That is what happened at May 17. It is not about dynamic linking at all.
FractalizingIron ago
Can you provide the logic/evidence that the post (which posts, how) shows how NSA intercepts every comm? How then is Q4436 relevant?
I'm open to increasing my understanding, but at this point, my serious concern is how some stupid bogus idea that Obama.org actually posted Floyd's image BEFORE his death became viral among unthinking patriots.
36963 ago
On the link pointing to the O site I see an image different from the current image on the O web site.
FractalizingIron ago
An anon used teh wayback machine (archive) digged into the code and found where the CURRENT image is.
https://www.obama.org/wp-content/uploads/053020_GeorgeFloyd_Protests_Chicago_IL_CD_1588-scaled.jpg
THAT is the image that Twitter accesses because THAT is the image the Obama.org website admin has deisgnated as the current CARD. (the script Q posts shows how Current cards can be checked. )
36963 ago
Here is the current link
https://www.obama.org/
The link Q gave us with the date May 17 embedded the picture as it was at the time of the posting :
https://mobile.twitter.com/ObamaFoundation/status/1262054709772324866
FractalizingIron ago
No, it gave us the picture that is CURRENT for the Obama.org website. posted by the webmaster here, on May 30.
https://www.obama.org/wp-content/uploads/053020_GeorgeFloyd_Protests_Chicago_IL_CD_1588-scaled.jpg
Moreover, Q4437 affirms that Q KNOWS that images are linked dymanically. The code he references indicates this directly (it's used to dynamically check links and bust or clear the cache of old images). see this article:
https://dev.to/ben/how-devto-dynamically-generates-social-images--2c2n
At this point, it should be very clear that
4436 is a post to tell bad actors (obama foundation, etc) that Q knows what Obama did with his 2020 Graduation Speech, that 4437 is telling the querying anon that Q KNOWS images are linked dynamically, and therefore a) don't worry and b) that WASN'T the reason we (Q) posted the Obama tweet in 4436, and then 4437 is telling everyone that 4436 was NOT for anons (i.le. suggesting that Obama foundation pre-posted Floyd's pci) but rather for Deep State actors: "We know what you/Obama did"
36963 ago
This can easily proved if there are direct snapshots by dates.
UnbreakablePatriot ago
Time stamp doesn't matter. The picture is dynamic and connected to the organization and will update on past dates. That doesnt mean it isnt a message to someone, but it also means we shouldn't present this to anyone unless we understand the message it represents because right now it makes people think Q fucked up.
36963 ago
Here is the current link
https://www.obama.org/
The link Q gave us with the date May 17 embedded the picture as it was at the time of the posting :
https://mobile.twitter.com/ObamaFoundation/status/1262054709772324866
UnbreakablePatriot ago
Then again there is another link up on voat for 8kun with a better theory. Still...pointing out to normies that the pick was on the 17th is easily debunked and has asshole against K jumping all over it to prove Q is a larp. Needs better fine tuning before we spread its message
UnbreakablePatriot ago
NO, I am not a coder but they debunked that aspect on 8kun already. However, they think Q was pointing out something about the source code. This was one theory I saw pasted below. I dont know if that holds either though:
"
I do believe that is Q declassifying how the deep state had been spying on the people.
enter_url_and_click_preview
is a method within
visit_twitter_and_log_in
Twitter method has some sort of logical control over a classification of URL actions (web browsing).
But then the question I would have is
If enter_url_and_click_preview is a method of visit_twitter_and_log_in, what if anything makes visit_twitter_and_log_in a method, and what are the other defs in the same level as visit_twitter_and_log_in?
If this is but a snippet of the entire code…
What if the full code shows other social media sites…
With this structure, this to me looks like a snippet of Python (in metaphor but structure is there) code that is a WIDE_SCOPE connection to say the least!
Q 'hacked' 'big social media'?
Are we witnessing a worldwide start of open source Q-class coding in free space?
We can answer each other's queries without needing to see a person's entire digital signature."
36963 ago
I mentioned on 8kun there are a lot of posts that are misleading and look stupid.
UnbreakablePatriot ago
Ahh that makes better sense.
UnbreakablePatriot ago
Thats for sure. Hubs is in the absolute proof or I am gonna make fun of you crowd even though he follows it with me. He jumped all over this and carpe donktums reply wrecking the original proof circulating on twitter.
BigTrucker ago
I don't know the original or if what we are looking at is genuine to begin with. Haven't had the time to research yet. I have seen MANY altered tweets being passed here.
beekerbaker ago
So many it gets old chasing down stuff like this.
BigTrucker ago
And I think that's exactly what manipulators rely on. I would say a good 20 to 30% of what is passed around as proofs and facts are manipulations and untrue. I have found many but I don't even bring it up anymore because oh, well you know why.
corrbrick ago
Good to know. Thanks for keeping us honest.
BigTrucker ago
I have found manipulated tweets being used as proofs even. I get upset because I feel like people release them and no one bothers to research them or validate them and then if I bring it up I get attacked by my own people.
pizzaequalspedo ago
Yep and it undermines your credibility with normies when you release fake shit
BigTrucker ago
Yes exactly. Lot of folks if they see something they're interested in, go to research it and find out its fake will never look no further into the movement.
DocWood45 ago
I posted (retweeted) a article a while back and days later the original pic was replaced. Don't know exactly by who but the article was still there, and the timestamp of my posting didn't change. Just throwing this out there.
corrbrick ago
OK, thanks.
25140875 ago
There HAS to be a logical explanation for this...
jbo5112 ago
It's grabbing a picture from the website. As the website changes, the preview changes.
Go to Twitter's card validator: https://cards-dev.twitter.com/validator
Look up an obama.org archive from the tweet's date: https://web.archive.org/web/20200517224631/https://www.obama.org/
You get a tweet that originally showed: https://files.catbox.moe/xqyk3p.jpg
ALIENS2222 ago
Grunge ago
the next Q post was "not all posts are meant for anons"
seems like Q is backtracking, making excuses.
Christosgnosis ago
yeah, sure looks that way - Q not wanting to admit to a fuck-up
robertdebruce ago
hey that same statement was made by a shill on 8 kun.
Christosgnosis ago
I reacted too quickly to the controversy that was surrounding all the discussion over the date-timestamp of the linked tweet
Here's my latest perspective (which is actually what my initial perspective was because I didn't first notice the May 17th date-timestamp when I went to look at the tweet):
Q4436 points out we're dealing with a Jim Jones style religious cult, fully with its own George-Floyd-as-a-martyred-Jesus narrative (let me explain)
StormRanger ago
The simplest explanation is the comm was not for us as explained in his next post.
HelloDolly ago
Honestly, that sounded like a BS explanation to me.
UnbreakablePatriot ago
Me too, especially since Q told us to reconcile...
the_art_collector ago
The simplest explanation is that the thumbnail updated. However, I don't see the source image on the website. Not sure how Twitter fetches those.
Jimmy88 ago
The NSA got into the Twitter account and changed the picture?
tekashi69 ago
Q is a LARP. Reconcile.
corrbrick ago
Someone on the thread explains the photo away with this:
Does that make sense to anyone?
Grizzible ago
I did a reverse image search on the image and the earliest I found was from June 1st
redstarkachina ago
here is a link to source for image supposedly https://twitter.com/josiebellini/status/1267667853777436673
Grizzible ago
This is the source of that image... in the HTML
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EZepJskWsAAn_kJ?format=jpg&name=small
Grizzible ago
Right. I pulled that image from the source code and did a reverse image search. It first shows up June 1st.
corrbrick ago
Good work!
Grizzible ago
Thanks
beekerbaker ago
Coding for sites will get updated with new content or changes to the site itself.
corrbrick ago
I see (sort of). Thanks.
Double_D ago
Yes. The embedded link's thumbnail can change.
MIKEYANDMD1 ago
This tweet was on 5-17 but he died
5-25 ! Does the pic go back in time and change?
FractalizingIron ago
Twitter simply loads the CURRENT image (card) for the Oabam.org website. Not the one used on May 17.
Using Q's script, brings this result: https://files.catbox.moe/g2zhe0.JPG
All the script does is retreive the current card for the website (obama.org) you insert.
robertdebruce ago
Where's the date, can you go back to May 17 and see the image there?
FractalizingIron ago
Only if you have a screen shot or archive of the link AT THAT DATE.
But, if you look at the actual image NOW being used, the name indicates it was posted on May 30.
https://www.obama.org/wp-content/uploads/053020_GeorgeFloyd_Protests_Chicago_IL_CD_1588-scaled.jpg
Of course, that's not proof. They can assign any name they want. But the fact that the Tweet was posted on May 17 and that the linked image is NOW Floyd is also NOT proof that that image was the one posted on May 17 at Obama.org. it just isn't?
Here's an analogy. On January 12, 2017, You establish a direct line to the White House Oval Office. That direct line is now fixed (tweet). It is connected to the White House. It will ALWAYS connect you to the White House Oval Office.
If you use the phone on January 15th, You use the phone and who's voice do you hear? Hussain's voice.
Then, you use the phone on January 25th, who's voice do you hear? D. J. Trumps.
each time you start your computer (or phone) and load your twitter program, the tweets appear. If the tweet has an embedded link to another website or video, etc, it 'calls' the website or video. If the article is still there, no problem. If the video is there, no problem. If NOT, then you'll see something DIFFERENT to what you saw when they WERE there. Likewise, if the linked site uses a NEW image, THAT new image will appear in the tweet. It's not rocket science, right?
If you phone the Oval office on Jan 25 and you hear Trumps voice and you therefore conclude, hey, Trump must have been in the Oval Office on Jan 12th when I installed the phone line, you would be wrong.
Hope this helps.
jbo5112 ago
What would have originally been grabbed on May 17
https://files.catbox.moe/xqyk3p.jpg
FractalizingIron ago
thank you. Most helpful.
the_art_collector ago
I haven't seen an archive showing that.
corrbrick ago
That's my question, and I assume Q's reason for posting. But then, I'm not twitter savvy.
tekashi69 ago
I knew this immediately. If this is a legit Q drop we've been had.
ugnn303 ago
What a ride, This Movie just keeps getting better.
baccachew75 ago
Real people getting hurt in real time. The movie sucks.
moderator99 ago
Deep focus by watchers creates more realism.
Step back a little and take a breath.
brettco12 ago
That said- media has been used against us my entire life. What if white hats are using media to wake the population up- who says they aren't creating fake news to do so. The recent scary news could possibly contain fake stories.
IAmJohnBarron ago
Kinda starting to feel that way
bopper ago
Not picking the drop up yet..sounds very intriguing.
ugnn303 ago
Ho Lee Fuk
plowboys ago
Way to low
noeffort ago
Are you Chinese?
ugnn303 ago
No.
My guess, Are you a fag?