clanofwolves ago

Any sauce on archive sites?

RecceRat ago

Just gone to the Ytube link above of Saint Obama yapping using a tor browser and whadda ya know, 0 comments, 0 likes/dislikes sneaky Utube. So for anyone else who's commented, it won't show. Just thinking aloud, could this be part of the way they comm? Surely an upload of the saint himself would usually illicit many fawning fans of his?

moderator99 ago

I left 3 comments and saw 0 others.

FractalizingIron ago

Wow. The Ytub link, right?

If you log out, or use a different browser, you'll see your comments are also invisible. So it seesm Ytub can allow comments but make them only visible to the user who inputs them???

(I used a different browser, and could not see my own comment. Didn't know that was possible. Sneaky.)

moderator99 ago

I've seen this before with YT. Quite a while back. Some pages can apparently be set up to not take input. I don't know why.

beekerbaker ago

Comments on youtube ( most site ) can be hidden or bots. Not the places to form ideas.

FractalizingIron ago

where?

moderator99 ago

On the youtube page for that Obama video.

moderator99 ago

I have a real hard time accepting the idea that any of these people need to relay secret messages through public channels, like speeches. You would have to explain to me why they can't use more private means.

FractalizingIron ago

Because the NSA can eavesdrop on EVERYTHING?

Particularly if they are engaged in Treason, etc. Which the NSA knows they are now. Fisa works both ways.

Q has constantly posted about how the communication channels for the deep state have been destroyed. Eg. The Star Wars game method, the Gmail Draft method, etc.

moderator99 ago

Because the NSA can eavesdrop on EVERYTHING?

Including speeches, drafts of speeches, discussions about drafts of speeches, etc. The real concern the DS would have is with the codes, not the method of communication. You can communicate just as effectively in private using codes as you can in public. Actually better, because you have more freedom to speak loosely and get away with coded wording in private comms.

Using a speech as a means of sending coded messages would suggest he wants to reach a large audience who would have to all know the codes, and he's certain that those codes are still unknown to our side. That would require explaining how those codes were passed around and kept secure from all the surveillance. It just becomes more problematic to try that than not. It only takes one person with the codes to slip up or get caught.

FractalizingIron ago

It's merely to hide it from the normies. That's all.

TomQRiffick ago

very interesting. serialbrain2 gave us great insight as to the communications between DS bad actors. we picked up quite a bit when madonna, ellen degenerate, hanks & others were communicating especially with corona typewriters.

for a while - there were lots of dog tweets - comey, streisand & others.

as an aside, i like charles payne of fox business. however, just the other day he tweeted his dog died. i thought, not him, too - don't have payne be DS - but Q says - those you trust the most.

you did a great job - thank you.

Basballdude ago

Try this on for size:

https://mobile.twitter.com/Bakenators/status/1269485711624769536/photo/1

Look at bakenators picture of an 8chan post.

MIKEYANDMD1 ago

Thank you - great explanation !

Basballdude ago

Yup that’s a good response to explain.

FractalizingIron ago

The T&A theory is FULL of holes.

  1. The article is still available.

    https://dev.to/ben/how-devto-dynamically-generates-social-images--2c2n

  2. The article affirms dynamic linking NOT negates it.

We get a lot of questions about how we generate these default images dynamically.

  1. The script referenced (also by Q) is used to dynamically update: There is more to the process than simply generating the image. We also need a cache-busting bot in order to update the card periodically. If we want to show a growing number of comments over time, we cannot wait for Twitter to bust the cache once per week.

The developers reply:

Twitter associates the image with the URL which cannot be changed after it gets tweeted out

Its the URL that cannot be changed, not the image (because the image is dynamcially retrieved FROM the Url site.

moderator99 ago

Its the URL that cannot be changed, not the image (because the image is dynamcially retrieved FROM the Url site.

THIS

beekerbaker ago

Yes

FractalizingIron ago

Dunno. I read Truth And Arts thread, but I found it unconvincing so far. I mean, does Q have to go after trolls?

I need to look closer, but it actually seems the article he linked actually confirms Dynamic linking, not negates it, and the script is a method of making sure the linked image is up to date. I mean, at first look.

corrbrick ago

That's the same impression I got -- Bernie backs off of his conclusion at the end.

FractalizingIron ago

The real problem is, far too many patriots read something and just re-post without doing critical thinking or due diligence to check. The thing goes wild, and it just becomes a distraction at least, and misinformation (disinformation) at worst.

Remember all the crap theories about Hanks in Custody, Oprah's house being raided, etc? Q had to put that stuff to bed by directly referencing all that garbage. It would not have gotten traction if patriots applied even the most basic of critical thinking instead of emotional reactionism.

jtreddit ago

Explains

Peplfxr ago

Good catch I just posted that some thread in another post