I encountered the "Obama Foundation posted George Floyd's image BEFORE he died" theory on Twiffer earlier today while crunching stuff, before I saw the Q posts in question here.
But I recognized that what Anons were posting - that the OF had pre-posted Floyd's image before he actually died, aka on May 17/18 - as nonsensical and bogus. I pointed it out to a few anons. I mean, that's just BASIC linking content.
Then I found Q's post on the image , linking the account, and had that aha moment. This is WHY anons were posting that.
Q4436
https://twitter.com/ObamaFoundation/status/1262054709772324866
Reconcile.
But still, don't make sense. And an anon on the 8kun Research baord pointed this out (next Q drop - 4437), eliciting a response from Q:
Q4437
Anonymous ID: ac933c No.9511175 📁
Jun 6 2020 19:42:01 (EST) NEW
Q you really need to walk that last one back…..
The same reason a thumbnail of a gray clapboard shows up on a YouTube video when it's been deleted…
The thumbnail is CURRENT (obama.org main image)……… but the content is OLD.
Q you really need to retract that………………………………………………….
9511175
def visit_twitter_and_log_in
visit 'https://cards-dev.twitter.com/validator'📁
find('input.js-username-field').set(ENV['TWITTER_USERNAME'])
find('input.js-password-field').set(ENV['TWITTER_PASSWORD'])
click_on('Log in')
end
def enter_url_and_click_preview(url)
find('input.FormControl').set(url)
click_on('Preview card')
result = has_content?('Page fetched successfully')
visit 'https://cards-dev.twitter.com/validator'📁
end
end
Q
So what's going on here?
I came to Voat to see what Anons here have been posting about this, and read a lot of the comments in one of the prominent posts.
https://voat.co/v/GreatAwakening/3861757
This is where things started to click.
Firstly, comments like "Makes me wonder what the hell Q is doing..." I mean, its a good question.
Secondly, comments about Twitter storing the original Link card (image) make no sense, I think, cos otherwise would Q post the script with validator?
When I used the validator script, this is the result I got:
https://files.catbox.moe/g2zhe0.JPG
Yes, it shows the CURRENT card/image for Obama.org. As you would expect. Nothing about storage of cards on the date the embedding tweet was posted (May 17/18)
Then, for me, at the end of the comments, @cabalstone’s comment made the most sense. Link here: https://voat.co/v/GreatAwakening/3861757/24180215
FOR THOSE SEEKING CLARITY ON LAST Q
LINKS LOAD DYNAMICALLY SO ANY LINK TO OBAMA ORG SHOWS A GEORGE FLOYD PICTURE - NO MATTER WHEN POSTED
BIGGER POINT MESSAGE SENT TO A BAD ACTOR
IS WE KNOW RENEGADE SIGNALLED DURING COMMENCEMENT
THAT STAGE WAS SET FOR AN EVENT
Now THAT makes sense.
With that in mind, I went over to the Obama.org site linked in the tweet, and started to look at the footage of Obama’s address. Very interesting.
If you listen to the address with Open ears and knowledge of how the Cabal uses coding, etc, you can hear MANY points that could be used to signal / communicate with assets and operatives. (It takes some practice – you have to be able to extrapolate, understand metaphors and symbolic ideas, and have a sense of what might be being said.)
A rather astonishing fact was that despite some half a million views, NOT ONE comment had been posted, and I saw NO likes or dislikes.
https://files.catbox.moe/49ee3m.JPG
So, I decided to drop a comment, to see if it stuck. So far, so good.
But I find this absence of comments VERY hard to explain. Downright weird.
Meantime, Anons may want to visit the Ytub page and post some comments. Open range, patriots!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H8Ego3_43lQ
500K+ views, so far 1 comment. (LOL)
Wanted to get this out fast, so I’ll leave it there. I think its worth digging more into the address, and working on some decodes of that. We can easily imaging that Obama is NOT free to communicate with Assets like he once could.
Conclusion: seems like Q is saying that Obama used the Class of 2020 address to signal to assets that the ground was ready for the events – aka Covid stage 2 = Race Riots kicked off by a racial killing.
NOT that Obama Foundation actually posted Floyd’s picture before hand, because that just ain’t how embedding links works.
Hope to update, as I do an analysis of the Obama 2020 Graduation Speech
Q4438
Not all posts are meant for Anons.
clanofwolves ago
Any sauce on archive sites?
RecceRat ago
Just gone to the Ytube link above of Saint Obama yapping using a tor browser and whadda ya know, 0 comments, 0 likes/dislikes sneaky Utube. So for anyone else who's commented, it won't show. Just thinking aloud, could this be part of the way they comm? Surely an upload of the saint himself would usually illicit many fawning fans of his?
moderator99 ago
I left 3 comments and saw 0 others.
FractalizingIron ago
Wow. The Ytub link, right?
If you log out, or use a different browser, you'll see your comments are also invisible. So it seesm Ytub can allow comments but make them only visible to the user who inputs them???
(I used a different browser, and could not see my own comment. Didn't know that was possible. Sneaky.)
moderator99 ago
I've seen this before with YT. Quite a while back. Some pages can apparently be set up to not take input. I don't know why.
beekerbaker ago
Comments on youtube ( most site ) can be hidden or bots. Not the places to form ideas.
FractalizingIron ago
where?
moderator99 ago
On the youtube page for that Obama video.
moderator99 ago
I have a real hard time accepting the idea that any of these people need to relay secret messages through public channels, like speeches. You would have to explain to me why they can't use more private means.
FractalizingIron ago
Because the NSA can eavesdrop on EVERYTHING?
Particularly if they are engaged in Treason, etc. Which the NSA knows they are now. Fisa works both ways.
Q has constantly posted about how the communication channels for the deep state have been destroyed. Eg. The Star Wars game method, the Gmail Draft method, etc.
moderator99 ago
Including speeches, drafts of speeches, discussions about drafts of speeches, etc. The real concern the DS would have is with the codes, not the method of communication. You can communicate just as effectively in private using codes as you can in public. Actually better, because you have more freedom to speak loosely and get away with coded wording in private comms.
Using a speech as a means of sending coded messages would suggest he wants to reach a large audience who would have to all know the codes, and he's certain that those codes are still unknown to our side. That would require explaining how those codes were passed around and kept secure from all the surveillance. It just becomes more problematic to try that than not. It only takes one person with the codes to slip up or get caught.
FractalizingIron ago
It's merely to hide it from the normies. That's all.
TomQRiffick ago
very interesting. serialbrain2 gave us great insight as to the communications between DS bad actors. we picked up quite a bit when madonna, ellen degenerate, hanks & others were communicating especially with corona typewriters.
for a while - there were lots of dog tweets - comey, streisand & others.
as an aside, i like charles payne of fox business. however, just the other day he tweeted his dog died. i thought, not him, too - don't have payne be DS - but Q says - those you trust the most.
you did a great job - thank you.
Basballdude ago
Try this on for size:
https://mobile.twitter.com/Bakenators/status/1269485711624769536/photo/1
Look at bakenators picture of an 8chan post.
MIKEYANDMD1 ago
Thank you - great explanation !
jtreddit ago
https://twitter.com/TruthandArtTV1/status/1269461735037001728?s=19
Basballdude ago
Yup that’s a good response to explain.
FractalizingIron ago
The T&A theory is FULL of holes.
The article is still available.
https://dev.to/ben/how-devto-dynamically-generates-social-images--2c2n
The article affirms dynamic linking NOT negates it.
The developers reply:
Its the URL that cannot be changed, not the image (because the image is dynamcially retrieved FROM the Url site.
moderator99 ago
THIS
beekerbaker ago
Yes
FractalizingIron ago
Dunno. I read Truth And Arts thread, but I found it unconvincing so far. I mean, does Q have to go after trolls?
I need to look closer, but it actually seems the article he linked actually confirms Dynamic linking, not negates it, and the script is a method of making sure the linked image is up to date. I mean, at first look.
corrbrick ago
That's the same impression I got -- Bernie backs off of his conclusion at the end.
FractalizingIron ago
The real problem is, far too many patriots read something and just re-post without doing critical thinking or due diligence to check. The thing goes wild, and it just becomes a distraction at least, and misinformation (disinformation) at worst.
Remember all the crap theories about Hanks in Custody, Oprah's house being raided, etc? Q had to put that stuff to bed by directly referencing all that garbage. It would not have gotten traction if patriots applied even the most basic of critical thinking instead of emotional reactionism.
Basballdude ago
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EZ4efGPUwAIwleW?format=png&name=900x900
FractalizingIron ago
exactly.
jtreddit ago
Explains
Peplfxr ago
Good catch I just posted that some thread in another post