You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

VoatsNewfag ago

The bad actors are growing. More money is being thrown about. It will overwhelm the good people that keep this place humming peacefully.

If I'm not mistaken from what I gathered she can be "doxed" with a 2 minute google search and without any secret or prior knowledge.

As horrible as those trolls might be I have to point out that if someone leads a community dedicated on a conspiracy to take on the deep state, on taking down pedophile elites that run and ruin entire nations - and if they actually believe this conspiracy - they should perhaps take their privacy a bit more serious.

MudPuddlePie ago

Your argument seems to be blaming the victim for the crime. Lawyer-ese: The victim of the mugging would not have been attacked if she had been home instead of walking to the liquor store to get a soda. Therefore, she is partially responsible for her attack. Wrong.

Shoulda, woulda, coulda...everything in life is like that. If we all had a crystal ball, things in America would not have gotten to this point. It's not Srayzies fault an evil scumbag does evil things.

I've never been on any social media, not twatter, FB, gab, linked in, that one where you put cutesy animal parts on your face, then send the picture or any of the others I don't even know the name of.

The point being, in this digital age nothing is really private. If you are online, you can be doxxed. If someone was determined to do a person some evil, it can be done.

Put the blame where it belongs...not on the victim, but on the person who committed the crime.

VoatsNewfag ago

The point being, in this digital age nothing is really private. If you are online, you can be doxxed. If someone was determined to do a person some evil, it can be done.

Yeah. But if you use the name of your online identity and people find out about your online identity...

It's almost like using your real name as the username and people figure out it's your real name.

And sure everyone can be doxed if someone is determined. But if you don't want to get doxed - don't dox yourself with your username.

The victim of the mugging would not have been attacked if she had been home instead of walking to the liquor store to get a soda

It's not comparable at all. It's more like leaving your wallet in a debauched bar. No one should have stolen it in a perfect world but it's not exactly suprising. It's not even like that.

It's like you would get mad at people for finding out that you are Mister MudPuddlePie.

MudPuddlePie ago

The crime is the crime, don't blame the victim.

"It's like you would get mad at people for finding out that you are Mister MudPuddlePie."

LOL...first, that makes no sense. Second, it's clear in my comments what gender I am.

VoatsNewfag ago

Okay, miss MudPuddlePie then.

The crime is the crime, don't blame the victim.

I will blame people who act careless.

first, that makes no sense.

They "doxed" her by googling her username and figuring out she used it everywhere.

They found out that srayzie outside of voat is... srayzie.

Yes, it makes perfect sense because that's exactly what happened.

MudPuddlePie ago

People who act careless are still not responsible for a crime committed against them. The responsibility still resides with the criminal...

Sure, Srayzie prolly should have changed her name. But that does not absolve someone from doxxing her. Only evil people do that for evil purposes. Stop blaming the victim.

VoatsNewfag ago

not responsible for a crime committed against them.

They can certainly be responsible for acting careless.

And in this case she has responsibility for using the same name everywhere.

I don't even think this should be considered a ""crime"".

It's not illegal to point out that some girl uses the same username on twitter as she does on voat or facebook. That is not a crime. I think ""crime"" is a really manipulative way for you to describe this.

Stop blaming the victim.

No, fuck off.

I generally have a lot of sympathy for people who are being victimized. Even if they are rather careless or made bad choices. But not if they entirely brought it unto themselves.

Sometimes there are news stories about people jumping into a lions den in the zoo and getting mauled. It doesn't matter to me if they became the victim of a wild animal attack (a horrible thing to become a victim of). I can't have much sympathy for that and I will most certainly blame them for it. Do you disagree?

Now if someone goes camping and get's mauled by a wild bear I will have sympathy even though they put themselves at risk. And of course I will have sympathy for anyone who get's attacked by their neighbors dog without provoking it. But people who jump into an animal enclosure in a zoo and get mauled do not deserve my sympathy. It's not an accident but entirely foreseeable.

If you use the same username everywhere with the same profile picture and post public images on there it's not an accident.

There is no crime.

MudPuddlePie ago

Blabbity-blah, word salad, trying too hard, agenda driven.

Meh....later.

VoatsNewfag ago

Not an argument.

Cleareyes ago

Yeah this is what i mean, you have a intelligent fair and reasonable approach to questioning about this and these childish responses by some of the defenders just ring "off" to me, not helping their case here.