They're pretty great, right?
And most of you have no idea what kind of shit they put up with in order to make this such a great place. They won't tell you themselves. Srayzie tries to keep you all informed, but nobody really seems terribly interested.
One of your mods has been having their kids threatened, and another has been doxxed.
The main username, @Zyklon_b, linked to many others that are suspicious in nature, specifically declared that /v/GreatAwakening and /v/QRV will be "b[rought] to deaf". He uses retard-speak in an attempt to make you think it's all a joke. It's not.
I spent a few hours last week picking apart what a shitball he really is, it's not pretty, and it doesn't bode well for anyone he has targeted - anyone threatened by him ought to start looking to their defense. His supposed girlfriend or wife or fiancee heavily disrupted Pizzagate 9 months ago as well. Match made in heaven!
Given that the user in question, @Zyklon_b, doxed his fiancee's kids to the known pedos of Voat, and that she spent countless hours working against Pizzagate, is it not likely that these are real bad actors you've heard about from Q... right here on Voat? He even slips up and makes a compelling case for having been paid for his antics here - enough to buy a house!
It's all in those links.
Do you want to help? Do you want to keep this place from being destroyed by the same bad actors that spammed porn and loli in QRV? Do you want to do something that can have an immediate payoff for Q and the Q followers?
You can research these links and dig at something in your own back yard. Something that really and truly threatens your nice, comfortable subverse, or you can ignore it and have someone else do all the work because it's hard and exhausting and everyone should just do everything for you like the trolls say all Q people do. After all, it's your choice to know, and you can just choose not to know what's really going on.
Your mods cannot fight this alone. The bad actors are growing. More money is being thrown about. It will overwhelm the good people that keep this place humming peacefully.
If you do nothing else, click on the usernames of your mods every day and see what they're saying or doing. Weigh in. MAKE YOUR VOICE HEARD. SUPPORT YOUR MODS. Q wanted you to enjoy the show, but also to dig and VOTE!
@srayzie @Shizy @MolochHunter @Vindicator @kevdude
view the rest of the comments →
Cleareyes ago
I don't know, i saw a thread discussion between mod (srazyie) and intrixina, optics were pretty damaging for the mod here, rang pretty fishy to be honest. Normally for me to weigh whether someones a contributer or damager, i compare the net effect of their contributions. How popular was this sub before this mod came along into a power position and how popular is it after they have had time to influence it? Year or two later (throwing out a number since i don't know), are there more users or less? That is the tale of tape. If there are less daily users, doesn't mean they're a bad actor but definitely means they're ineffective to lead, and adds just another variable toward the "bad actor" probability. People can say what they want but to me results say it all.
Vindicator ago
Just for the record, srayzie made the sub from scratch. It was he4 personal Q research sub because the shills where attacking anything q related we were investigating on v/pizzagate. It blew up exponentiatlly in popularity as QAnon went viral. Your analysis, while sound in general, does not really fit the situation.
Cleareyes ago
ahhh okay i didn't know that, thanks for clearing that up. I don't want to divisionfag myself but i have to be honest, the responses surrounding this drama (not yours/this comment) makes it hard to ignore how shady it comes across as. I'll give her the benefit of the doubt though on this one, many of the other guys are clear shit disturbers (except Inixtrina thread or w/e, that one came across as pretty intelligent and rational- made mod look pretty bad, her responses just made it worse). Actually i got a whiff of something the last big drama (stickied) even though i defended board side but was just a whiff back then and now this one to add to it. Also pizzagate went really downhill in users since i started there, so the point would stand on that one.
I trust my instincts but will be fair in any case, thank you for the info
Vindicator ago
Hmm. We've added almost 6,000 subscribers since this time last year, Cleareyes. I think you may be buying into the narrative pushed by some of these same jokers. We busted a major shill about five months ago (sticky is still up), which took about a year of research gathering. He was using multiple sockpuppets to brigade content he didn't want discussed, silence users whose research he didn't like, and upvote those pushing narratives he approved of. We exposed his sockpuppets and documented the voting patterns. Claiming "pizzagate really went downhill" was his favorite meme. It also happens to be the siren song of the Washington Post, John Podesta, Buzzfeed and numerous other hopeful consensus setters. It simply ain't true.
There is real fuckery going on here on Voat.
The thing I look for is: what is the overall pattern? Anyone can get trolled into outbursts that can be used against them later. We all have our breaking point. And the more you invest here in creating content, the more you care, the bigger target you are. They will troll you until you break and then use that to troll you some more until they can turn it into a witch hunt.
Look at the users' overall contribution pattern to Voat. That's what people should be accountable for, for good or ill.
Cleareyes ago
True i assume, on subscribers but daily viewing is very low. I'm subbed to things i lost interest in and never read anymore (not pizzagate though). To be fair haven't followed the full narrative or know fully what is going on, i'm relying on the screenshot of using an alt and the intelligent questioning by a couple posters, the mod and a couple of supporters looked very shady in responses (only a couple of supporters though not all of them). Those are really the two main issues holding me back now, the daily viewers of pizzagate doesn't look good in terms of results either but could also mean more people migrated to the political happenings surrounding it (Q) rather than the crimes itself, since the crimes wont be dealt with without the political/judicial component of it so i can see that as a reason.
Yes i defended the board during the esoteric guy because that was clear manipulation no doubt. Now here's another one that could be just as easily cut and dry as the previous (since many of the current attackers are shady themselves and are using the same approach as esoteric), but doesn't really explain mod being shady herself, true though mod could be near a breaking point i will give her the benefit of the doubt here since one incident (meaning incident i personally witnessed) isn't enough for me fully make up my mind.
Thank you for your viewpoint, sounds pretty fair
Vindicator ago
I guess I'm not totally clear which thing we're talking about.
Pizzagate is in its third year (one of constant attacks designed to drive the audience away, too). We definitely don't have as many people sitting with the page open waiting to see what comes across the board, but I think that is a function of the role the board has always played in the larger elite pedo investigation. It's sort of the encyclopedia or library. People who want breaking news get it from Twitter -- there's just so much more of it, if you follow the right people. That's partly because a lot of those people can't participate on Voat (at least publicly) due to the sullied reputation Voat has. They tweet their material, publish it on their own blogs, and then we pick it up and archive it here in case their feed gets shut down. We're the place people come to dig.
Srayzie has never actively modded pizzagate. She is listed on the mod team so she can help in the event Eric or I can't get online.
Cleareyes ago
Yeah i kept getting banned from twitter so can't follow or comment anymore. Ahh okay fair enough on the pizzagate modding, but i appreciate your reasonable approach to this, provides me confidence in giving the benefit of the doubt to this situation
Vindicator ago
Your name checks out, Cleareyes. :-)
Cleareyes ago
haha sweet
Cleareyes ago
also forgot to add, checked the comment history of the people attacking mod, and they're pretty fishy too. So speaking objectively here, starting to smell like divisionfags working together in this event (in the event mod is truly fishy)
PuttitoutIsGone ago
Jew 101. Cause the problem then control both sides of the argument, forcing normies to choose sides.