You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

Ocean_Cruiser ago

Many Thanks for your brilliant analysis SB2. I can repair most electronic devices - Radars, Computers and such, but I can't get my head around the coding/decoding yet, as you demonstrate so easily. We're fortunate to see how it works thanks to your expertise.

PatriotHacker ago

That's because it's garbage and is not coding/decoding.

Coding/decoding means there is a 1 to 1 relationship between the ciphertext and the clear text. That means if I give you coded text it will only ever decode to 1 (or maybe a couple if it's a really sophisticated cipher designed to fake you out).

Using SB2s "methods" you can take a couple tweets and dates and come up with a bunch of different messages and there's no way to tell which if any is correct.

At each step he makes a choice, and there's usually no particular way to verify it was the right one.\

It's not decoding, it's more like palm reading or divination.

showbobandvagene ago

This is correct, He is seeing relations in numbers and mistakenly thinking they are code. If it were a true code, it would have only one outcome, Instead, his method has an infinitive number of outcomes.