- Part 1 - Neon Revolt
- Part 2 - CCP
- Part 3 - Proof most mods comped & removed
- Part 4 - Bots, Vote Manipulation, Mod Alts, no Mods comments for months
I promised you guys I would write and show more proof. I actually made a blog so I could embed images and make it easier to understand. I’m not done and will be adding to it. There is so much evidence to share to prove yo show how we’re being infiltrated. But I didn’t want to leave you guys hanging tonight..
Please see yesteday’s post...
PROOF - v/TheAwakening Mods were comped - Removed! The ones left is 2 Owners, but one is her alt!! AND NEONREVOLT is the one trying to have me doxxed.
Everything centers around Neon Revolt. See how I was contacted and blackmailed the day before Neon made the post. I believe that is Neon’s alt. On the same day, BuilderAnon contacted me. I had people trying to infiltrate v/GreatAwakening. There is more than this that I will add.
Neon Revolt is concerning to me, because he was able to manipulate so many people, and he’s writing a book on Q. One that will be in book stores. I don’t want him to end up as the next Jerome Corsi.
See this blog post where he trashes Q...
Snoozefest Edition
Is that the kind of person you want representing Q? I will share a lot more about him soon too.
In blog post. Make sure you follow the next link at the bottom of each page. You will see that the v/TheAwakening mods were being deception about changing the ccp setting. You will see how they were caught using bots for Vote Manipulation, as their users were unable to earn CCP of their own. You’ll see mods that had mod alts. Like I showed yesterday, out of 14 mods at one time, there are no mods left, and only 2 Owners. The 2 Owners is really only one person. Not one of them has made any comments in months.
Doesn’t that make you wonder who is running v/TheAwakening? Remember who praised those mods and endorsed them so much? Neon Revolt. Have you seen him post that the board owner of 8chan, and the BV’s, found that 90% of them were “retarded or clowns”, and were removed?
No he made a blog post and was very deceptive with the way he describes the whole situation. Neon’s blog post.
@NeonRevolt, don’t ever accuse me, Shizy, or MolochHunter of having SBBH thugs manipulating votes or using bots against you and your mods again. I think you owe a lot of people an apology. You can start with @FartOnToast @LightlyToasted, and @Fartyshorts. You are so fucked up ruining their reputations like you did. I don’t care if FartOnToast wasn’t perfect. What you did was fricken WRONG on so many levels. You should also apologize to the thousands of people that are divided right now.
I am glad Q made QRV. I think you were right when you said Q made QRV for a reason. Q also emphasized that it was the Reddit Replacement. Because Q was replacing what YOU helped create, and having 8bit- who they trusted take over.
You are the cause of all the drama around here, and you continue spreading lies, KNOWING the truth. You are a PAYtriot and Q needs to look into you.
Update: @DrogeAnon is suddenly active.
I put the latest Q post in the Notables sticky above.
view the rest of the comments →
crazy_eyes ago
it seems to me like you are trying to distract with all this drama day after day
srayzie ago
You don’t think it’s concerning that thousands of people don’t know that the mods were comped and have been removed and the one left isn’t even around? Who is running it? That’s concerning. It’s not concerning that the one that endorses them is writing a book on Q?
It’s kind of like, do you want to take the red pill or the blue pill? This is our Q home. A whole damn sub has been infiltrated. That Q sub is the only one not attacked. That should tell you something.
You just go live in comfy land then. I’m going to be careful about who I follow and warn people so they can make an informed decision. This isn’t about choosing v/GreatAwakening. There’s also QRV, and other subs. It’s about having safe subs that are not infiltrated.
crazy_eyes ago
I just think it is not Q related or great awakening related, it seems like all those others users you mentioned are not Q related either.
I direct people to simply read all the Q posts starting from the beginning, dont read someones book, read the source, and do your own research when you have questions, and do not let someone elses opinions sway what you know. Just find the truth.
It seems like you are giving those irrelevant people a lot of your attention and energy that could be better spent on things Q
srayzie ago
If that were the case, then Q wouldn’t have made a post in June, telling people that they were comped and to be removed/replaced. They weren’t. They came here. That makes it Q related.
crazy_eyes ago
Im not denying that people are fucking with you, but their mission is partly to get you off topic and in this case i think they have
Crensch ago
Are you familiar with ESOTERICshade?
A user or group that ran off the best PG researchers consistently because PG had a ton of people just like you that didn't want, or didn't think they needed, people like @srayzie to come in and wreck the shills so good users don't get run off.
I realize Q is a little different than just PG, but NR, if he is BuilderAnon/ElectroLumus, has a LOT of shillpower behind him and will ruin anything any anyone he can.
Alternatively, tell us what you think @srayzie should be doing instead.
crazy_eyes ago
my advice would be to ignore the bastards
Crensch ago
That's what PG did.
I'm sure there are plenty of archives, but look at PG's 'users here now' number.
This isn't a game. If users that can bust these faggots don't, the most active, (and naive,) users will get run off. Many PG researchers were doxxed and threatened, others were groomed by ESOTERIC et al, and manipulated or forced via willingly-given blackmail material to behave themselves.
@Vindicator @think- @MolochHunter @kevdude all have seen these things. They all can attest to the danger of letting these guys operate while those of us that aren't affected do nothing because of attitudes like yours.
And again:
And do what, instead of busting them? Is there something @srayzie hasn't done that needs done otherwise?
crazy_eyes ago
I guess Im not one to be afraid of them, I just think they are drawing attention away from Q, so dont give them attention was my first thought, just seemed logical. Srayzie can ban them, it just seems like a lot of unnecessary drama
think- ago
You might want to re-read what @Crensch wrote above, and what @MolochHunter wrote below.
I was a v/pizzagate mod for ten months, and now I'm a normal user again. To a certain degree I understand that normal users don't want to engage themselves too much in taking shills down. They come here to have convos with people they like, and to do research.
BUT
Taking notice of shills, and learn how they operate is something the average user will have to learn, if he/she wants these subs to thrive.
These shills are bad actors. They are not just some retarded guys who don't know how to behave on a board.
They do it deliberately, their actions are carefully schemed and planned.
As @Crensch and @MolochHunter have pointed out, they are driving the best researchers away.
What @Srayzie does, and what the other mods do isn't 'drama', it is an attempt to provide a good and safe environment for genuine Pizzagate / Q researchers, respectively.
We shouldn't allow bad actors to operate here. Burying our heads in the sand will contribute to them having success in destroying legit subs.
Think about it. Please.
@Vindicator @EricKaliberhall @Shizy
Edit: spelling
Crensch ago
It'd be nice to have a submission to point to that explains all of this to people that don't understand. Does anyone want to take a crack at it?
I'm not sure I would be the best qualified to do so.
@vindicator @molochhunter
think- ago
I'd suggest that all of us write something, and forward it to @Vindicator (if you don't mind, Vin), so that he can edit and re-write it, and put it together in a coherent post.
Actually, he might want to take the comment I left above, and @MolochHunter's comment above, as a starter, if he likes. I think that @srayzie and @Shizy have also already pointed out something along these lines, so they might want to dig into their comment history, and forward it to Vin.
Thoughts?
@EricKaliberhall