Yesterday I made the following post...
ATTENTION - No more posts or comments promoting Violence
We are changing the rule back to where comments and posts promoting violence being removed, applies to submission posts only.
Apparently, us mods should have no right to delete comments that are not ad spam and do not violate US law. (But, since we are not an adult subverse, we have the right to remove pornographic images posted in comments).
I am sorry if I caused confusion, or am letting you guys down. A lot of you have wanted this and agree with it. Before you go telling me off, I want to let you know that I am completely against promoting violence. I think promoting violence makes the Q community look bad, which is supposed to be about unity and not division (although some subs seem to ignore that part of Q’s message).
Promoting violence goes against everything Q stands for. That’s the shit the Dems are pulling and getting away with. I think promoting violence makes Trump look bad because the left wants to make Trump and Trump supporters out to be terrible people. I think the mainstream media loves reading and using those posts so that Q followers are not only made out to be conspiracy theorists, but violent hate groups. . All the more reason to want to shut down free speech sites and make people not want to follow Q or support Trump. But, the following is what I think would be the perfect scenario for these sick fucks to use. They used it on Gab recently...
How Conspiracy Theories Can Kill
Archive
As much as I am against changing the rule back, I’m going to do it because I respect Voats culture. Q used to reference posts from Reddit. They got shut down. Their free speech was taken away. When all the Reddit Refugees showed up, we welcomed them. If it were not for this place, we would have nothing. When r/GreatAwakening got banned, eventually Q fully endorsed QRV as the Reddit Replacement Sub. Obviously that means Q approved of Voat. We should respect it. Free speech has its pros and cons. But at least we don’t have to worry about being banned. Not unless the deep state comes after us for retards posting about violence.
Having said that, I found this article that helps describe what is legal and what is not. Comments that are not illegal are allowed. If it’s a submission, it is not allowed. So, please only ping us for those. There’s nothing we can do about the comments unless it’s a very direct threat. Those are great ones to downvote.
Supreme Court: Online Threats Aren't a Crime Unless You Really Meant It
@Shizy @MolochHunter @Think- @Crensch @Kevdude
view the rest of the comments →
Pcpoet09 ago
can I suggest to the community when we get a post advocating violence that since we cant remove it that we as group respond with a one word post....that word being scorn. we do this to let anyone checking us out know that as a group we don't advocate violence. I my self post the word scorn when I see something that is overtly offensive in nature and suggest to others do the same... this is a free speech platform o we are going to get troles who are here just to shit post and this seems to me to be a good way to respond keeping with in Voats rules