Our Potus on Fire
He's doing Exactly what we hired him to do.
They try to trap him, trip him up, twist his words, but if you listen with your own ears and No Commentary. . .he's spot on.
I'm sure they will have this all twisted up, flipped around and reversed to fit their wicked agenda!
Our president works for us. . .Loved when he put her in her place and let her know
He's president and They are NOT!
He's Simply the BEST!
view the rest of the comments →
MolochHunter ago
@ArtistiqueJewelry
Sorry I have to delete this post as an opinion piece. For more detail about the kind of posts we are less likely to delete please read https://voat.co/v/GreatAwakening/2780607
ArtistiqueJewelry ago
@srayzie Examples of Opinion pieces allowed to stay because. . .well, we all Know why!
https://files.catbox.moe/kadbxk.jpg
https://voat.co/v/GreatAwakening/2787911
https://truepundit.com/google-relies-on-soros-as-an-expert-in-good-censor-report/
This has an ad on it Right Away and you can't Even see the article unless you pretend you are putting their book in the cart.
So it's okay to do this if your popular and loved by certain people, but regular people who have been abused and used on here. . .a no go.
I have no issue with the content of the posts I listed as examples, but wondering Why there is a double standard which clearly Only applies to me because certain people were in the same group as haters like Enigmatic_ and the other one who was verbally abusive to srayzie.
I see a pattern.
I didn't give a link to steemit, which I have been repeatedly attacked, though others Run ads. I didn't give Any link, I simply posted an item in discussion.
It looks like censorship in a new form is all.
I know I am hated for calling a spade a spade, but it is what it is.
https://files.catbox.moe/sml0b2.png
I agree with these. . .but opinion. The difference is, they would have been removed by the mod If I would have posted them.
https://truepundit.com/watch-police-on-scene-after-protesters-stomp-antifa-in-street-fights-and-pockets-of-wild-rioting-saturday-night/
So can state their Opinion Directly in the title and okay, because their a fav.
https://www.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/comments/9ntkgl/npc_does_not_compute/?st=JN8LKBPA&sh=3b8d8abd
I don't have a problem with it, but Blatant Opinion. That's okay because it's the buddy club.
I know how it works, but I have Never liked Double Standards. Too Obvious!
MolochHunter ago
Ms Artistique
I dont know where this is coming from. I usually rate your posts quite highly. honestly
if you look in the Deleted folder you will see yours is one of two Trump / 60 minute stories that i deleted
if you read the PLEASE READ RULES FOR SUBMITTING POSTS post by @Srayzie, you will appreciate that all you have to do to get that post over the line is to provide a link of the 60 minute story
and you still could. its that easy to comply with the rules
ArtistiqueJewelry ago
Mr. Molochhunter,
I apologize if you weren't with a posse who has attacked. A couple of people gave indications you were, but I get how nothing they said should be trusted.
I am sorry and am used to most be against me. I shouldn't take it out on you.
As far as the link, it says an exception has been encountered when I attempt to put one in.
I realize it's not your fault personally for the double standard, I 'm simply used to encountering one and am constantly told on here how useless I am no matter how hard I work, encourage or what I do. I get I don't deserve respect, but get tired of seeing the double standard. Once again, I realize it's not your fault personally.
Thanks for your help.
MolochHunter ago
no problem
We are aware there's a bit of a grey area that can cause a bit of a double standard at times - and sometimes mods just havent gotten around to fielding some posts so they stay up longer than they should - I discuss it here https://voat.co/v/GreatAwakening/2780607/14425441 and, as I mentioned there, the key takeaway is that its pretty easy to get over the line so long as you are on a Q topic - which is quite broad - and have a link . What Srayzie is trying to achieve here is to rise submissions to a standard that has at least a little investigative / informative substance, and of course we have no issue with what you posted word for word if it were in a comment section under other peoples posts, or provided a link to some source of or about the 60 minute interview
post on, fren