Attacks leveled against me Here
I am told by others in the truth telling community this occurs because I am over the target. Not going to lie, it grows wearisome! Yes, yes, don't feed the trolls, but what about when they attack your character and haven't even researched who and what you stand for? I am not under an anonymous name and back up what I say. We are supposed to be on the same side. Do you suppose they are paid opposition? Or perhaps their ego is simply bigger than the cause.
view the rest of the comments →
Enigmatic_Continuum ago
So, I decided to look deeper into her Steemit account to see if I could find any original content as she has not provided any per my request. I have not found any, and have decided to take the opportunity now to substantiate my claims.
See here how she made $15.30 by regurgitating info that others have posted, which includes videos, Tweets, and other connections other Voat members have established through their own tireless research.
Notice how her paragraphs are simplistic and she doesn't expand on the material and evidence she's provided by venturing into any original analysis.
https://steemit.com/qanon/@artistiquejewels/boom-boom-boom-boom-a-week-to-remember-dark-to-light-light-seems-to-be-shining-in-az
All of the video evidence she provides have been created by someone else.
To drive my point home, she also mentions the CEMEX connection, but this has been ripped from other sources and still doesn't expand into any original analysis as demonstrated by these two Voat threads, which demonstrates original thinking and analysis by two different Voat members.
https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/2589124
https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/2577902
@Crensch @srayzie @Vindicator
Can we start cracking down on people who are using Voat to make money by ripping off others' content and spamming the boards on Voat to funnel traffic to Steemit to generate revenue? I can hardly believe, no, I CAN believe that she's making almost $10 dollars by creating a thread where all she's doing is bitching (ex. the Steemit thread this Voat thread is linking to). She'll stop at nothing to make a dime, and now that she knows that crying, bitching, and being a lowly drama queen/victim beings in bucks, nobody on Voat is safe from her using them as an example to protect her income stream.
Crensch ago
I'm going to defer to @Vindicator and @srayzie on this. I'm not familiar with Steemit or the user in question, so making any kind of judgment call would be irresponsible.
I will say thank you for keeping an eye out either way. It's important to check up on usernames and do what's needed to keep them honest.
ArtistiqueJewelry ago
I appreciate the commitment, but with all due respect, am wondering how someone who is the attacker is allowed to break the rules, then tattle on the person he attacked. I thought people were Not allowed to disrespect other posters. He has leveled False Accusations with no basis and has not listened to all of my reports on youtube (not monetized, I give no links nor request money as many others do) so the attacks are unwarranted.
I was under the impression we were trying to win our country back from these Rules for Radicals tactics. He is unjustly accusing and I don't think people are aware he does this often with language and name calling to people he decides he doesn't like, or don't agree with him. I was told I need to interact, but I don't want to interact with someone who is disrespectful and degrading.
Please refer to a comment I am leaving once again, as I have had to defend myself against all of these False Accusations and didn't once tattle as he did me, when he created the issue then didn't like that I defended myself.
I am responding under his comment that states this with a great deal more info. I didn't want to get into, but I don't know any honest person who spends the amount of time I have spent well before Q was on the scene, not making one dime, who would not defend themselves from these blatantly false accusations just because he is caught up in the number of votes. This Is Not a Game! Q said not to be divisive!
Detailed response under this comment of Enigmatic_Continuum where he states, "Thanks for replying, but my problem isn't with her not being on topic, it's that she's using Voat to drive traffic to See it,and so she can make money. I'm involved with a few charitable causes and I would be instantly black balled if I ever tried to make a cent from the cause."
Please note, he is respectful to you, but one of the reasons I did an article was to have the evidence of how disrespectful and degrading he has been of me, when I do a great deal of work. Thank you for considering my side of things.