The Search and Seizure Warrent states that Granite Intelligence had it from the beginning and it was documented as being located and confiscated by the FBI between September 23 and October 3rd 2016...
Believe me, I understand what this new information does to the alt media narrative we've been falling back on since Prince and True Pundit released the article... we can make hypothesis after hypothesis all day long, but the story that NYPD saw some abhorrent child porn snuff and leaked it to the press is not provable and relies on the quote that an unnamed NYPD CHIEF saw images to make him throw up.
Maybe the NYPD could have possibly had the laptop before it even went to Granite Intelligence, that would make more sense, but the time line doesn't match up with the storyline and there is currently not one NYPD warrant, police complaint or documentable proof that NYPD soley had this case at anytime prior or after FBI confiscation.
Did they help with interviews, research, and man power under the control of the FBI investigation, absolutely... did they have the laptop availabe for review while under the control of FBI...according to the ESI agreement through the courts and detailed in the search and seizure warrant, yes. But it was wiped guys... if there was child porn, it's gone and was not used to prosecute him. Granite Intelligence has the same security firm run by a man, David McDonnough, who worked with Kroll Security firm. Kroll and Black Cube helped Harvey Weinstein most likely get out of CP charges and only take the fall for sexual harrassment.
Google "James Oneil NYPD weiner laptop"... Nothing.
Google "William Bratton NYPD weiner laptop"... Nothing.
No quotes from either Police Cheif of the NYPD around that time in 2016. These stories, imho, are misreported, I don't trust unnamed, undocumentable sources, I feel bad, but we have court docs telling a different story with dates, times, names, and case numbers.
The SVU is NYPD and they're the ones who handle sex crimes.
How does the NYPD conduct an investigation on a sexting case without access to electronic devices?
Did they help with interviews, research, and man power under the control of the FBI investigation, absolutely... did they have the laptop availabe for review while under the control of FBI...according to the ESI agreement through the courts and detailed in the search and seizure warrant, yes. But it was wiped guys... if there was child porn, it's gone and was not used to prosecute him.
There was child porn on the computer, the feds admitted it. You're just biting on the respun news story.
"Mr. Kim praised and thanked the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Special Victims Division of the New York City Police Department for their outstanding work. The case is being handled by the Office’s General Crimes Unit."
"The Office prosecutes cases involving violations of federal laws, and represents the interests of the United States government and its agencies in criminal and civil matters."
The NYPD's SVU, is seprate from DOJ Federal Law Enforcement Scroll down to "General Crimes".
I agree, my point was Kim praised SVU and all the preliminary reports stated that SVU was doing an investigation too. So, him giving the head nod corroborates these reports..
NYPD detectives and the Manhattan DA’s office are also “looking into” allegations that Anthony Weiner engaged in a months-long sexting relationship with an underage girl, sources told The Post Thursday.
The NYPD’s Special Victims Unit is investigating the matter after a 15-year-old high-school student released a trove of sick texts and photos she allegedly received from the disgraced politician.
“We’re looking to see if a crime was committed in New York and if there’s a complainant,” an NYPD official said.
Disgraced former congressman Anthony Weiner is under federal and local investigation for allegedly engaging in a sexual relationship with an underage girl, CNN, ABC and CBS reported.
A law enforcement source confirmed the reports to The Huffington Post Thursday.
According to CNN, the office of U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara has subpoenaed the New York Democrat’s phone records. The FBI and New York Police Department are also reportedly investigating the charges.
A spokesman for the NYPD confirmed that Weiner was being investigated, but did not comment on the charges. The U.S. Attorney’s office declined to comment.
Now people are claiming NYPD SVU had nothing to do with it and it was all federal. My only point is that the warrant release doesn't prove NYPD never had the computer. So people like @Are_We_Sure claiming "The Weiner laptop story is DEAD. It will remain DEAD even if SVU did work on the case." are full of shit and pushing a narrative.
SVU is the TV show. SVD is the unit in the NYPD we are talking about. I've been making that mistake too. A few years after the show debuted the NYPD changed the name.
Google "James Oneil NYPD weiner laptop"... Nothing.
Google "William Bratton NYPD weiner laptop"... Nothing.
No quotes from either Police Chief of the NYPD around that time in 2016.
These men are not Police Chiefs. There are police commisioners. Chief is a high rank within the NYPD. There are about 15 chiefs. There's about another 15 Deputy Commissioners. Your point still stands because none of this people talked to the press about Weiner's laptop and all the things that were supposed to happen if Hillary wasn't indicted didn't happen either.
Your confusion about who is who is because there's not just a division between federal and local and another division between cops and prosecutors. There's four possible groups here
Local cops --NYPD
Local prosecutors --office of the Manhattan District Attorney or the DA
Federal cops --the FBI
Federal prosecutors --the office of the US Attorney for the Southern District of NY.
The reference to the Office’s General Crimes Unit is to the federal prosecutors, Assistant US Attorneys within the Southern District of NY. SVD is local cops. They are a division within the Detectives Bureau
The NYPD's SVU, is seprate from DOJ Federal Law Enforcement
yes, because they are local.
"General Crimes" are Federal agents.
No. General Crimes are prosectors, assitant US Attorneys not FBI.
did they have the laptop availabe for review while under the control of FBI...according to the ESI agreement through the courts and detailed in the search and seizure warrant, yes.
This is not a yes. It's a maybe. It looks like the warrant would apply, but that is only for the federal case. For the NYPD to use any info they would need their own warrant. And given that the FBI notice Clinton letters on the laptop pretty quickly, they may have kept it only in house. We simply don't know who saw what.
we've been falling back on since Prince and True Pundit released the article
There was child porn on the computer, the feds admitted it.
Have you ever used skype? Using skype does not equal creating child porn. If this is what you are relying on for you claim, this is not the FBI admitting anything.
I agree, my point was Kim praised SVU and all the preliminary reports stated that SVU was doing an investigation too. So, him giving the head nod corroborates these reports..
Kim praised SVU for help in the federal investigation. He did not corroborate anything about a local investigation. That could be open and active. That could open and dormant. That could be closed due to the federal case ending in a conviction.
The story was the NYPD got the laptop first and was horrified by what they saw and were all ready to indict dozens of people when the FBI swooped in and took the case and the laptop away from them. The NYPD didn't trust the FBI, so they copied the laptop before handing it over. Then they threatened the FBI and James Comey that the truth would come up if he didn't indict Hillary Clinton. That story is dead. Even honeybee sees that.
SVU is the TV show. SVD is the unit in the NYPD we are talking about. I've been making that mistake too. A few years after the show debuted the NYPD changed the name.
I didn't make it past honeybee because of this. Why would I read any further when you open up with some nitpicky bullshit like this? You even admit they were called SVU.
view the rest of the comments →
Honeybee_ ago
Federal Employee, Potential Classified Documents, never a legit quote from a named source... the SUV GCU is not the NYPD, it is District Attorney and Federal Prosecutions...
The Search and Seizure Warrent states that Granite Intelligence had it from the beginning and it was documented as being located and confiscated by the FBI between September 23 and October 3rd 2016...
Believe me, I understand what this new information does to the alt media narrative we've been falling back on since Prince and True Pundit released the article... we can make hypothesis after hypothesis all day long, but the story that NYPD saw some abhorrent child porn snuff and leaked it to the press is not provable and relies on the quote that an unnamed NYPD CHIEF saw images to make him throw up.
Maybe the NYPD could have possibly had the laptop before it even went to Granite Intelligence, that would make more sense, but the time line doesn't match up with the storyline and there is currently not one NYPD warrant, police complaint or documentable proof that NYPD soley had this case at anytime prior or after FBI confiscation.
Did they help with interviews, research, and man power under the control of the FBI investigation, absolutely... did they have the laptop availabe for review while under the control of FBI...according to the ESI agreement through the courts and detailed in the search and seizure warrant, yes. But it was wiped guys... if there was child porn, it's gone and was not used to prosecute him. Granite Intelligence has the same security firm run by a man, David McDonnough, who worked with Kroll Security firm. Kroll and Black Cube helped Harvey Weinstein most likely get out of CP charges and only take the fall for sexual harrassment.
Google "James Oneil NYPD weiner laptop"... Nothing.
Google "William Bratton NYPD weiner laptop"... Nothing.
No quotes from either Police Cheif of the NYPD around that time in 2016. These stories, imho, are misreported, I don't trust unnamed, undocumentable sources, I feel bad, but we have court docs telling a different story with dates, times, names, and case numbers.
"Sources" Say....
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/09/21/nypd-anthony-weiner-sexting-minor/
https://nypost.com/2016/09/22/nypd-investigating-weiners-sexting-relationship-with-teen/
"Court Documents" Say...
https://nypost.com/2018/05/17/search-warrant-for-weiners-electronic-devices-unsealed/
https://www.dropbox.com/s/kkeq4cl7agqh0x6/In-Re-Search-Warrant-issued-on-October-30-2016-for-access-to-email-messages-involving-Hillary-R-Clinton-located-on-the-Computer-of-Anthony-Weiner-and-Huma-Abedin.pdf?dl=0
https://www.dropbox.com/s/w6pyobllukq71mz/IMG_20180518_115607.jpg?dl=0
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/4465430-WEINER-Search-Warrant-2016.html#document/p2
youllrememberme ago
The SVU is NYPD and they're the ones who handle sex crimes.
How does the NYPD conduct an investigation on a sexting case without access to electronic devices?
There was child porn on the computer, the feds admitted it. You're just biting on the respun news story.
[“During the latter two Skype sessions, on February 18 and 23, 2016, and in a Shapchat communication on March 9, the defendant used graphic and obscene language to ask the Minor Victim to display her naked body and touch herself, which she did.”](https://nypost.com/2017/09/20/weiner-convinced-teen-to-strip-fondle-herself-on-skype-feds/]
Why didn't they prosecute him for it? Elite privilege?
Honeybee_ ago
You wrote:
Yes, that is true, but in this case it seems they are seperate, its so confusing, I may be wrong, but go through this me...
The NYPD's SVU, is seprate from DOJ Federal Law Enforcement Scroll down to "General Crimes".
In this DOJ Press release it states:
"General Crimes" are Federal agents. Your article is referring NYPD's Special Victim's Unit, not DOJ Office of the District Attorney, Southern District of New York, General Crimes Division
youllrememberme ago
I agree, my point was Kim praised SVU and all the preliminary reports stated that SVU was doing an investigation too. So, him giving the head nod corroborates these reports..
NYPost
Huffpo/CNN
Now people are claiming NYPD SVU had nothing to do with it and it was all federal. My only point is that the warrant release doesn't prove NYPD never had the computer. So people like @Are_We_Sure claiming "The Weiner laptop story is DEAD. It will remain DEAD even if SVU did work on the case." are full of shit and pushing a narrative.
Are_we__sure ago
SVU is the TV show. SVD is the unit in the NYPD we are talking about. I've been making that mistake too. A few years after the show debuted the NYPD changed the name.
@honeybee
These men are not Police Chiefs. There are police commisioners. Chief is a high rank within the NYPD. There are about 15 chiefs. There's about another 15 Deputy Commissioners. Your point still stands because none of this people talked to the press about Weiner's laptop and all the things that were supposed to happen if Hillary wasn't indicted didn't happen either.
Your confusion about who is who is because there's not just a division between federal and local and another division between cops and prosecutors. There's four possible groups here
Local cops --NYPD
Local prosecutors --office of the Manhattan District Attorney or the DA
Federal cops --the FBI
Federal prosecutors --the office of the US Attorney for the Southern District of NY.
The reference to the Office’s General Crimes Unit is to the federal prosecutors, Assistant US Attorneys within the Southern District of NY. SVD is local cops. They are a division within the Detectives Bureau
yes, because they are local.
No. General Crimes are prosectors, assitant US Attorneys not FBI.
This is not a yes. It's a maybe. It looks like the warrant would apply, but that is only for the federal case. For the NYPD to use any info they would need their own warrant. And given that the FBI notice Clinton letters on the laptop pretty quickly, they may have kept it only in house. We simply don't know who saw what.
This fake story was in circulation before the True Pundit article. See this video from two days before the True Pundit story. https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=13&v=-5yAcG4JofU
Have you ever used skype? Using skype does not equal creating child porn. If this is what you are relying on for you claim, this is not the FBI admitting anything.
Kim praised SVU for help in the federal investigation. He did not corroborate anything about a local investigation. That could be open and active. That could open and dormant. That could be closed due to the federal case ending in a conviction.
The story was the NYPD got the laptop first and was horrified by what they saw and were all ready to indict dozens of people when the FBI swooped in and took the case and the laptop away from them. The NYPD didn't trust the FBI, so they copied the laptop before handing it over. Then they threatened the FBI and James Comey that the truth would come up if he didn't indict Hillary Clinton. That story is dead. Even honeybee sees that.
youllrememberme ago
I didn't make it past honeybee because of this. Why would I read any further when you open up with some nitpicky bullshit like this? You even admit they were called SVU.