I couldn't believe it when I saw Q linking Epstein with the Pope. I hadn't really expected that plot twist. Here's my take:
The first Epstein-related post is this one in which an anon asks "P=Pope? and Q replies "[Pope] will be having a terrible May. Those who backed him will be pushed into the LIGHT > Dark to LIGHT. TRUTH."
Next, an anon posts a "liesofkikes.png" cartoon and asks "Tell us Q. How many are connected to the (((Roths)))?" Q replies "The "Chair" serves the Master. Who is the Master? P = C." He's already confirmed P = Pope and now equates P with C.
Another name of the Papacy is the "Chair of St. Peter." This refers to the literal seat the Pope sits in, as well as his authority. When a pope declares something ex cathedra that is, "from the throne of Peter," his proclamation is considered infallible (this has only occurred a few times in history), and is based on Matthew 16:15-19, which reads:
15He said to them, “But who do you say that I am?” 16Simon Peter said in reply, “You are the Messiah, the Son of the living God.” 17Jesus said to him in reply, “Blessed are you, Simon son of Jonah. For flesh and blood* has not revealed this to you, but my heavenly Father. 18And so I say to you, you are Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church, and the gates of the netherworld shall not prevail against it. 19I will give you the keys to the kingdom of heaven. Whatever you bind on earth shall be bound in heaven; and whatever you loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.”
The "Chair" serves the Master. Who is the Master?
Jesus is the Master, as he describes himself in Matthew 10:24:
24No disciple is above his teacher, no slave above his master. 25It is enough for the disciple that he become like his teacher, for the slave that he become like his master. If they have called the master of the house Beelzebul, how much more those of his household!
26“Therefore do not be afraid of them. Nothing is concealed that will not be revealed, nor secret that will not be known. 27What I say to you in the darkness, speak in the light; what you hear whispered, proclaim on the housetops.
Note the darkness/light in the scripture about the Master vs. Q's first comment above about the [Pope].
The way he has phrased this, I believe QAnon is saying that Pope Francis is a Fake, is in the [kill box] and either B17 will be restored to the Throne of Peter, or a new pope will be chosen (I think the former though, because B17 was deposed under death threats after trying to clean up the pedo situation in the Church and the fuckery in the Vatican bank, I have read).
Only after all of this does Q get to Epstein. He replies directly to his own comment about the P = C who serves the Master, saying "Why is Epstein spending $29mm to bury the tunnels underneath is temple on Epstein Island? Problem. Phones were allowed in. These people are stupid." A few minutes later, he says "H" in reply to his comment -- emphasizing the missing "h" in "his" temple. This implies Hillary, whose initials he incorporates in the follow up, coded post, which includes a picture of Pedo Island, whose file name is "187.jpg". 187 is code for murders. Under the picture, he says "Where do roads lead? Each prince is associated with a cardinal direction: north, south, east, west. Sacrifice. Collect." Not sure exactly what all of the rest of it means, but he appears to be saying Epstein is collapsing the tunnels to hide evidence of where the "#chickenlovers" have been...shall we say...sacrificing "chickens" to Moloch.
An anon posts the picture of the Papal Audience Hall that looks like a serpent. Q then replies "Symbolism will be their downfall."
Going back to his first statement here, Killbox pope will be having a terrible May...Dark to LIGHT etc. I think he is saying that the powers that put Pope Francis on the throne (maybe via sacrifices or blackmail at Epstein Island) have been deposed and a Pope who holds the true authority of the Chair of Peter because he serves the Master (Jesus) will take his place.
view the rest of the comments →
think- ago
So, who or what is C? C = Chair?
Whom do you mean by B17? looks puzzled
How would this even be possible I wonder?
Benedict XVI was/is a very sinister person, someone from his innermost circle who left the Vatican (due to his gay marriage) said the time Benedict XVI was Pope was the 'darkest and most gay' Popedom in recent history. And he should know.
What I'm trying to say is: There have been certainly at least two factions in the Vatican (and beyond) - one supporting Benedict XVI, one supporting Francis, the latter having been successful.
But both Popes are dark persons, and I can't see so many 'white hats' Cardinals in the Church, they all have been chosen by the current Pope and former Popes.
Vindicator ago
Yes, the web of lies and disinfo is incredibly tangled. Perhaps B17 is evil...or perhaps his situation was similar to Kim Jong Il and Kim Jong Un, whom Q has characterized as "hostages". To sort through what's what, it helps to zoom out and look at patterns.
As head of the Congregation of the Doctrine of the Faith (the bureaucracy tasked with preventing corruption of Church teaching) under JPII, Ratzinger held fast against the dilution of Church teaching by moral relativism and Ecumenism pushed by bishops of both Europe and the US. The two of them consistently rebuked the abortion industry, the euthanasia movement, fetal tissue harvesting for research, IVF and genetic engineering, which are all part of the Eugenics movement and beloved by globalists. They also continuously harped on the importance of the sacredness of marriage and the importance of the nuclear family as the heart of civilization, and resisted Islamicization calling for Europe to acknowledge it's historical Christian roots.
All of that changed once Raztinger was forced out. Now we've got a pope who pushes globalism, the climate change scam, open borders, wants to rewrite the Lord's Prayer, embrace divorce, homosexuality, and got rid of the Commission for the Protection of Minors. He is the first pope I've ever seen lauded by the MSM, worldly governments, and progressive bishops. He claimed Trump was not Christian because he wanted to build the wall.
think- ago
Yes. You can of course, see it that way.
My view mainly focuses on how he dealt we sexual abuse. Pope Francis isn't better though, in this regard.
And I think JP II's - and B16's view - on abortion, divorce and homosexuality were too strict. (That's the liberal part in me).
Of course I reject Francis' suggestion to rewrite the Lord's Prayer, think the LGBTQ movement went too far, and I don't condone abortions after the 12th week of pregnancy and the globalist movement (getting rid of the sovereign states, extending and deepening the EU, and, last not least, open borders / mass immigration.
I wasn't happy with JP II, B16, and I am not happy with Pope Francis.
Shizy ago
Hebrews 13:8 Jesus Christ the same yesterday, and to day, and for ever.
Societal views may change, and of course the Catholic church's views and doctrine change, but Jesus does not. That tells me his followers shouldn't be changing either
think- ago
Well, during the first centuries of the Church, marriages f.i. were not a matter of the Church at all. It only changed at some time during the MIddle Ages.
In the Early Medieval Period, husbands just sent their wives back to their family, if they wanted to get rid of them. The Church didn't oppose it, as far as I recall.