Greetings folks,
I've been doing a lot of thinking about the role of v/pizzagate, the Q Leaks and our shared mission to wake up the masses to the evil that has corrupted our government agencies, powerful corporations, and charity foundations. I am working on a thread for v/pizzagate explaining how Q is "Pizzagate Related" and it occurred to me one of the biggest problems we have both on Voat and on 8chan is that almost no one is writing posts that bring crumbs and their resulting research together in articles that explain things. Lots of little tidbits and back-and-forth, some videos, lots and lots of cool memes, but not much *reporting. Meanwhile we've got shills and concern trolls writing essays.
Writing things out in black and white, a la traditional newspaper reporting citing sources and direct quoting them, is very very important because it is how things are put "on the record" and pass into the documentation of the history of the times. I've always kind of seen v/pizzagate as the "newspaper of record" for the Clinton Cabal exposure, because it's the only organized place the "reporting" has been consolidated and not erased by hostile IT companies. If the Q Leaks are legit, we need to be "reporting" the crumb findings, not just sharing tidbits and following along. I know we've got the skills to do that. I think it is what Q is asking for.
Please ping me to any such threads you see here or on 8chan or elsewhere. Consider learning how to make them yourself and post. Include pizzagate relevance for any you submit to v/pizzagate. We just passed 16,000 subscribers and are growing again, so there are a lot of eyeballs there to spread the word.
If anyone does not know how to "report" on the latest Q findings, here's a Three Minute Guide to Writing a News Article.
To this, I would add: always write the lede and the title LAST -- you won't know what's most important until you've written a draft in the inverted pyramid style, and organized your sources by importance.
When you write the title and lede, write it as a premise or hypothesis that invites people to prove or disprove it. This invigorates research! Naysayers have something to aim at -- which will reveal holes in the theory which will inspire additional research and discovery, or lead to a speedy admission the hypothesis is wrong. It's exactly what we need. Every critical comment shills think erodes your piece actually strengthens it when it is addressed. Welcome them! They make the argument stronger. That's how truth works.
Keep up the great work Voat anons. I look forward to seeing some great threads.
srayzie ago
Thank you! I’m going to have to add this 3 minutes guide to the sticky.
Check this post out... https://voat.co/v/GreatAwakening/2409607
I didn’t put it in pizzagate because it’s just a small little reference. But he has a connection to John Podesta thru a charity. His dad is FBI and mom is high up in CNN.
Vindicator ago
That whole Hogg family is pretty much exactly what pizzagaters say about MK Ultra. Creepy as hell.
srayzie ago
And the supposed shooter had mental issues and spent time in the mental hospital.
EricKaliberhall ago
Agree!
I made a post about a week ago in v/pizzagate about my concern on how "we" will interact with individuals "RedPilled" by Q and wanting answers regarding PizzaGate. Too soon I believe. The post got spammed before any type of discussion even began... But I'm with you @vindicator, I believe our most important task now, is to make both Q and PizzaGate understandable for newcomers. After decipher Q accurately of course.
https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/2393969
crazy_eyes ago
Have you tried writing an overview? I have had the same thought as you here, I was thinking of maybe going back and reading all the Q posts over again and taking notes to compile an overview of sorts from my perspective, especially since Q hasnt posted the research seems to be meandering aimlessly
Vindicator ago
I have unfortunately been up to me eyeballs in v/pizzagate mod turmoil and have not had time to do so, but it is exactly what is needed. We've got a lot of speculation and stream of consciousness video explanations but we need to start synthesizing the material and making statements about what it means that can be proven or disproven. What I keep wanting to do is print out the map, cut it into pieces and sort them into piles to see how the rough topic areas fall. If we create article here on Voat making assertions about significance, we can then repost them back on qresearch for critique/discussion/development. Then we can edit the Voat thread with any new material from 8chan. Finally, someone can post it to Steemit with pretty graphics and memes, so we have an eye-candy link that can be shared on Twitter, Facebook and elsewhere. Voat links look like crap on Twitter.
Ping me when you write up your overview and post it in here. Would love to see it!