This is the kind of stupid shit "truthers" spend their time on. A cruise missile hit the Pentagon, but planes flew into the Twin Towers? What kind of fucking sense does that make? Why don't you instead talk about the Dancing Israelis, who have names, faces, and FBI+police records?
It does. A soft material can cut or erode a harder material with enough kinetic energy or over a long period of time. The photo even shows the cutoff point where the wingtips didn't have "enough energy to do this. The passports were obviously planted independently. There's no reason to believe you about "absolutely horizontal and vertical sections of the building"
Reverting to the "schlomo" ad hom only shows that you're a shithead who can't argue effectively.
By the time the wings, and especially the tail section reached the building, they WOULD HAVE been going TOO SLOW, due to the torsion effect, to have penetrated hardened steel and concrete specifically designed to stop airplanes.
If they were real, the wings would have sheared off and fallen to the ground.
Are you an architect or an engineer? I doubt it. I am. If you are, you should know better.
Please explain to me and this entire national team of hundreds of architects and engineers how butter can go through a butter knife if itstmobinf fast enough https://www.ae911truth.org/
And you have not answered one question, Schlomo. Stop your pilpul.
It's pretty simple. You make your hard material really thin and your soft material really fast. You keep increasing its velocity until it's kinetic energy is enough to overcome the bond energy of the border region around the impact area. Once you know that it's possible in theory it's just a case of putting real values into the equation to find out if it will happen in a particular situation or not.
And you can shove your schlomo up your arse, shithead.
Hey Schlomo it's NOT that simple. Once a big long object hits something as hard as steel, it starts to slow down immediately. By the time the weak ass plastic and aluminum wings would have gotten to the hardened steel, the object would have been going too slow for the wings to penetrate, evwn more so for the tail section.
Oh, actually it is simple if you're not a retarted Schlomo.
That link is full of studies, charts, calculations, diagrams and proof from architects and engineers who did the math that you won't look at sonyou can stay wrong in your fantasy world. Do I need to send you individual links to the 100 or so studies on that site or do you know how to internet? Willfully ignorant. Fuckwit.
I'm not worried about it. You can't back up your claim because you're full of shit. Any asshole can pretend that that they have an authoritative source, your word has no value.
lolno. You don't even have to watch 5 minutes of the video I provided. Where is your evidence to the contrary?
Why does it mean so much to you btw, Larper?
view the rest of the comments →
chrimony ago
This is the kind of stupid shit "truthers" spend their time on. A cruise missile hit the Pentagon, but planes flew into the Twin Towers? What kind of fucking sense does that make? Why don't you instead talk about the Dancing Israelis, who have names, faces, and FBI+police records?
bloodlibelisreal ago
No. No planes were used on 9-11.
SerialLarper ago
Bullshit. Video editing doesn't push a hole into a buuilding.
https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-rfk-biWRz44/U635N8lZP4I/AAAAAAAAAMY/wXhoFBjg5_c/s1600/M.jpg
bloodlibelisreal ago
Neither does plastic and aluminum....
Can you tell me what's NOT in that picture? No pieces of aluminum wrapped around the steel/concrete? No plane parts. No chairs. No....nothing.
But the passports survived eh......
Fuck off Schlomo.
AdaptOrDie ago
It's the simplicity of it that really hits different.
SerialLarper ago
It does. A soft material can cut or erode a harder material with enough kinetic energy or over a long period of time. The photo even shows the cutoff point where the wingtips didn't have "enough energy to do this. The passports were obviously planted independently. There's no reason to believe you about "absolutely horizontal and vertical sections of the building"
Reverting to the "schlomo" ad hom only shows that you're a shithead who can't argue effectively.
bloodlibelisreal ago
Here's the problem with your dumb argument.
By the time the wings, and especially the tail section reached the building, they WOULD HAVE been going TOO SLOW, due to the torsion effect, to have penetrated hardened steel and concrete specifically designed to stop airplanes.
If they were real, the wings would have sheared off and fallen to the ground.
SerialLarper ago
Like I said, not enough kinetic energy, fuckwit.
bloodlibelisreal ago
Bull. Shit.
Are you an architect or an engineer? I doubt it. I am. If you are, you should know better.
Please explain to me and this entire national team of hundreds of architects and engineers how butter can go through a butter knife if itstmobinf fast enough https://www.ae911truth.org/
And you have not answered one question, Schlomo. Stop your pilpul.
SerialLarper ago
It's pretty simple. You make your hard material really thin and your soft material really fast. You keep increasing its velocity until it's kinetic energy is enough to overcome the bond energy of the border region around the impact area. Once you know that it's possible in theory it's just a case of putting real values into the equation to find out if it will happen in a particular situation or not.
And you can shove your schlomo up your arse, shithead.
bloodlibelisreal ago
Hey Schlomo it's NOT that simple. Once a big long object hits something as hard as steel, it starts to slow down immediately. By the time the weak ass plastic and aluminum wings would have gotten to the hardened steel, the object would have been going too slow for the wings to penetrate, evwn more so for the tail section.
Oh, actually it is simple if you're not a retarted Schlomo.
SerialLarper ago
The fact that the softer object starts to slow on impact doesn't affect the essential point that it's an energy argument, dipshit.
bloodlibelisreal ago
Once the object starts to slow down, it wouldn't have enough energy for the wings nor the tail section to pass through steel and concrete, dipshit.
SerialLarper ago
Shithead, that fact that something slows doesn't mean that is slower than an arbitrary value.
bloodlibelisreal ago
It would have been to slow for the aluminum and plastic wings to pass through hardened steel and concrete, Schlomo.
SerialLarper ago
You have no numbers to support that, airhead.
bloodlibelisreal ago
Oh but I do.
Study after study after study after study. Lots of em here
https://www.ae911truth.org/
SerialLarper ago
Links aren't numbers, fuckwit.
bloodlibelisreal ago
That link is full of studies, charts, calculations, diagrams and proof from architects and engineers who did the math that you won't look at sonyou can stay wrong in your fantasy world. Do I need to send you individual links to the 100 or so studies on that site or do you know how to internet? Willfully ignorant. Fuckwit.
SerialLarper ago
There's no reason to think that you know how to interpret what they wrote, shithead.
bloodlibelisreal ago
Im one of the engineers........
But I didn't post the link for you to worry about how I interpret it. I don't need to interpret it. I helped do some of the studies.
The link was for you, shithead.
SerialLarper ago
I'm not worried about it. You can't back up your claim because you're full of shit. Any asshole can pretend that that they have an authoritative source, your word has no value.
dat_face ago
Try this
https://www.bitchute.com/video/WFj8fNi4nPER/
SerialLarper ago
Yes, the video was edited. That doesn't mean that there were no planes that hit the building.
dat_face ago
LOL you actually are a Larper aren't you.
KIKE ALERT everybody. Be sure to tag.
SerialLarper ago
Keep believing that, loser.
dat_face ago
You're a right shitbag. Fuck you dude.
SerialLarper ago
Point out that you don't know what you're talking about doesn't make me a shitbag. Go cry to someone who cares, dipshit.
dat_face ago
Lol shilltard.
SerialLarper ago
The context speaks for itself. Anyone who accuses someone of being a kike because they lost an argument deserves contempt.
dat_face ago
But you lost the argument bro
SerialLarper ago
No, you have no answer for your non-sequitur. Here's my response again:
Yes, the video was edited. That doesn't mean that there were no planes that hit the building.
dat_face ago
lolno. You don't even have to watch 5 minutes of the video I provided. Where is your evidence to the contrary?
Why does it mean so much to you btw, Larper?
SerialLarper ago
Hole is the same size as a plane:
http://911research.wtc7.net/planes/analysis/docs/WTC_hole.jpg
Naudet footage has a plane, fireman hears it and looks up:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=miA8Td4oNcY
Zooope ago
Rip this link... You have this downloaded right?
dat_face ago
I have it downloaded from when it was on YT 😄