This is the kind of stupid shit "truthers" spend their time on. A cruise missile hit the Pentagon, but planes flew into the Twin Towers? What kind of fucking sense does that make? Why don't you instead talk about the Dancing Israelis, who have names, faces, and FBI+police records?
I remember that day an interviewee said he saw: "grey/silver planes with no windows hit the twin towers". I've never seen that again. Whose the only ones that use planes with no windows? The guvernment
It does. A soft material can cut or erode a harder material with enough kinetic energy or over a long period of time. The photo even shows the cutoff point where the wingtips didn't have "enough energy to do this. The passports were obviously planted independently. There's no reason to believe you about "absolutely horizontal and vertical sections of the building"
Reverting to the "schlomo" ad hom only shows that you're a shithead who can't argue effectively.
By the time the wings, and especially the tail section reached the building, they WOULD HAVE been going TOO SLOW, due to the torsion effect, to have penetrated hardened steel and concrete specifically designed to stop airplanes.
If they were real, the wings would have sheared off and fallen to the ground.
Are you an architect or an engineer? I doubt it. I am. If you are, you should know better.
Please explain to me and this entire national team of hundreds of architects and engineers how butter can go through a butter knife if itstmobinf fast enough https://www.ae911truth.org/
And you have not answered one question, Schlomo. Stop your pilpul.
It's pretty simple. You make your hard material really thin and your soft material really fast. You keep increasing its velocity until it's kinetic energy is enough to overcome the bond energy of the border region around the impact area. Once you know that it's possible in theory it's just a case of putting real values into the equation to find out if it will happen in a particular situation or not.
And you can shove your schlomo up your arse, shithead.
Hey Schlomo it's NOT that simple. Once a big long object hits something as hard as steel, it starts to slow down immediately. By the time the weak ass plastic and aluminum wings would have gotten to the hardened steel, the object would have been going too slow for the wings to penetrate, evwn more so for the tail section.
Oh, actually it is simple if you're not a retarted Schlomo.
That link is full of studies, charts, calculations, diagrams and proof from architects and engineers who did the math that you won't look at sonyou can stay wrong in your fantasy world. Do I need to send you individual links to the 100 or so studies on that site or do you know how to internet? Willfully ignorant. Fuckwit.
I'm not worried about it. You can't back up your claim because you're full of shit. Any asshole can pretend that that they have an authoritative source, your word has no value.
lolno. You don't even have to watch 5 minutes of the video I provided. Where is your evidence to the contrary?
Why does it mean so much to you btw, Larper?
Maybe you can explain how aluminum and plastic passes right through hardened steel and concrete?
Thats like saying butter can pass through a butter knife if you throw it fast enough.
Maybe you can explain how the wings, the weakest part of the plane, didn't hit the hardened steel and concrete and sheer right off and fall to the ground.
Maybe you can explain how there was zero torsion and that the tail section went into the building at the exact same speed as the extremely weak nose cone did. Ever see what a bird does to a nose cone of a plane...but these planes had hardened nose cones that can pass theough steel and concrete like butter. Riiiiiiiihhgt. Maybe you can explain how the planes parts disintegrated, but the passports didn't.
Maybe you can explain how the supposed plane that hit the pentagon was able to get so close to thw geound without knocking down any light poles or trees what-so-ever.
Maybe you can explain how there was no plane in the hole in PA Flight 93. Look up plane crashes on an image search. Look at lots and lots of them. Then look at the plane crash of Flight 93. What's missing?
Maybe you can explain how some guy got on his cell phone and called his wife from 34,000 feet to say "we're storming the cockpit, let's roll," and why (((hollywood))) was ready to make a movie out of that onbious hollywood script.
Maybe you can explain why the BBC reported that building 7 fell, 8 minutes before it actually fell. Speaking of building 7, maybe you can explain how a "paper fire" can heat up steel support framing in such a way that all load bearing supports simultaneously collapse causing the building to fall vertically. Same goes for the towers as well.
PEAK STUPIDITY is believing that any of that is actually possible. PEAK STUPIDITY is believing the official government and media story. We know they're all honest right....PEAK SHILL is shutting down any real questions and research online.
And I haven't even gotten started on the jews.......
Maybe you can explain how aluminum and plastic passes right through hardened steel and concrete?
How can a hunk of metal traveling hundreds of miles per hour pass through a building with modest amounts of concrete and steel, and lots of glass windows? Is this the question you are asking?
Thats like saying butter can pass through a butter knife if you throw it fast enough.
Anything can pass though anything if you throw it fast enough. Even water can cut through steel at high enough velocity. Energy is proportional to velocity squared. But metal is not butter.
Maybe you can explain
Maybe you can explain how we have multiple videos from independent sources showing planes flying into buildings, which matches the timing of hijackings.
Fuck off Schlomo.
Maybe you can explain why you want to distract with stupid shit like "no planes" instead of talking about the Dancing Israelis?
Obviously hasn't researched anything. 3 levels of the hardest steel ever produced at the time. Why were the windown so narrow?? Oh, because there was so much steel.
No. Water is hitting the steel at a constant velocity which is way faster than a fucking plane. Not only that, by the time the wings would have reached the building, rhey would have been going TOO SLOW to penetrate anything as hard as steel, because as soon as the "plane" hit it would have started to slow down. Even more so for the tail section.
No. Planes.
Did you do an image search for plane crashes? Did you then do an image search for the flight 93 crash? WHERE'S THE PLANE????
Did you explain how a barely trained "arab terrorist" can fly level to the ground and slam into the side of the pentagon without knocking down any telephone poles or trees??
No. Planes.
Seeking the truth is NOT a distraction. I hadn't wven gotten to the jews yet. The "dancing israeli's" isn't even the half of it.
There are NOT multiple videos from independent sources that show planes. The only videos that show planes come from the media. The other "independent source" videos just show explosions. Why does yourube keep taking actual original "independant source" videos where people say repeatedly it was a bomb, that there was NO PLANE!
Water is hitting the steel at a constant velocity which is way faster than a fucking plane.
And the plane has much more mass than water. The point is when you talk about materials, but ignore mass and velocity for "impossible" things to happen, you show yourself to be ignorant.
Seeking the truth is NOT a distraction. I hadn't wven gotten to the jews yet.
But it's not a distraction? You refute yourself. You waste all this effort and discussion on stupid shit, that anybody with half a brain will dismiss, while ignoring the documented and irrefutable evidence of the Dancing Israelis. Everybody has heard about the supposed Muslims that were celebrating in New Jersey, when we know for a fact that citizens from our "Greatest Ally" were doing it. But go on, keep on talking about imaginary planes.
The mass and vocity have been taken into account and the official story is bullshit. Imagine believing the media and government and thinking that is makes you smart.
Here is a page with hundreds of actual architects and engineers, full of studies and graphs and charts that prove a plane cannot donwhat they say it did.
Imagine believing the media and government and thinking that is makes you smart.
Imagine denying basic video evidence from multiple sources and not understanding basic physics, and then coming up with a retarded idea about "no planes", and NOT talking about the Dancing Israelis, and thinking you're smart.
Here is a page with hundreds of actual architects and engineers, full of studies and graphs and charts that prove a plane cannot donwhat they say it did.
They say demolitions must have been involved. They don't say, "No planes were used on 9-11." Retard.
Imagine believing video evidence that came from the press. Imagine.
I already posted video proof as to why the video evidence came from 2 people, both of whom were "journalists." Im sure you didn't watch it though. Why think outside the official story amirite.
The rest of the actual day-of video shows no planes.
Why does youtube keep taking down the day-of videos where people on the street say they saw no planes.
Do yourself a favor. Really do it. Look ip plane crashes on your favorite image search. Look through page after page after page. Look at as many as you want for as long as you want. Then look at the flight 93 crash and tell me whats missing.....
Plus, why would the architects and engineers for 9-11 truth need to talk about explosions if "jet fuel melts steel beams?"
Imagine believing video evidence that came from the press. Imagine.
Imagine thinking that not only were there no planes involved, but thinking that multiple press outlets were involved in your massive conspiracy theory to show fake video of planes flying into buildings. Imagine.
I already posted video proof as to why the video evidence came from 2 people, both of whom were "journalists." Im sure you didn't watch it though. Why think outside the official story amirite.
I didn't watch it because you've proven yourself to be retarded, and I was avoiding wasting time on a proven retard that distracts away from the Dancing Israelis with retarded ideas. But hey, if you insist, I can watch your retarded video and show that you are still retarded:
All right, so 4 minutes in of a 45 minute video and he claims, "With today's technology, making a live, realtime shot look like the CNN Hezarkhani shot would be impossible. But remember, the first time this was shown was many hours after the event."
You know what else was impossible, especially at the time? Faking that video within hours of the event to match up the events on the ground. And there are LOTS of videos, from independent sources, of the event. So you've got to have them all faked. That's why I call you retarded, because your conspiracy-addled brain can't sift through the most ridiculous claims to the most plausible ones, so you settle on the most ridiculous ones, while completely ignoring documented fact like the Dancing Israelis.
Plus, why would the architects and engineers for 9-11 truth need to talk about explosions if "jet fuel melts steel beams?"
Jesus fucking Christ, the retard in you never ends. On top of "no planes", we've got the most cliche "truther" phrase of 9/11, jet fuel and steel beams. You really are a piece of work.
Imagine it's 2020 and you still haven't realized that multiple lress putlets are in fact run by the same peopme and are in fact involved in massive conspiracy theories. Imagine being that dumb.
"I didn't watch the video because of you." Willfully ignorant. That's why they keep getting away with it. We have a country that lets the lress think for them and people who fight to stay in the matrix.
The technology was NOT impossible at the time. This shit is POSTJurassic Park. If you slow monthe OLD video with MODERN TECHNOLOGY you can see that the video is fake as fuck. Again, willfully ignorany.
You are a fucking retard.
Since you so fucking smart, who do you keep ifnoring building 7 and the COMETE LACK OF A PLANE IN PA??? Oh, and explain how you make a cell- phone call at 34,000 feet???
Or.....just keep pushing the official narrative and trying to convince people that the multiple press outlets don't work together and push giant conspiracy theories (including hollywood). Imagine it's 2020 and you still think the major press outlets are iNdEpEnDeNt. Fucking retard.
Imagine it's 2020 and you still haven't realized that multiple press outlets are in fact run by the same peopme and are in fact involved in massive conspiracy theories.
Imagine being an idiot and buying into retarded conspiracies that involve an ever-expanding wave of people that need to be in on the conspiracy, in the most ridiculous fashion, involving fake planes and hoax videos of a massively public event in the middle of New York City, one of which occurred 15 minutes after the other and had countless eyes on it. YOU ARE A MASSIVE RETARD AND A WASTE OF TIME. Talk about the Dancing Israelis, you retard. Nah, don't do that, you might actually open people's eyes with documented evidence and show the truth about our "Greatest Ally". Keep on talking about retarded theories that anybody with half a brain dismisses.
I'm done here. I've wasted enough time on a retard.
Imagine it's 2020 and you still don't know about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq conspiracy, or the guld of tonkin conspiracy, or the holohoax conspiracy, and pushing the mainstream narrative.
Imagine believing 19 arabs with box cutters can hijack and overpower 4 planes full of people.
Imagine trying to make a point but ignoring building 7 and Flight 93 because it doesn't fir your narrative. If it doesn't fit, just ignore and call everyone names eight Schlomo?
Imagine thinking that birds destroy nose cones, but nose cones destroy steel.
Imagine being so butthurt that someone believes there were ZERO planes AND that the dancing Israeli's had something to do with it.
Imagine being such a butthurt unoriginal pussy that you have to steal the "imagine" line that the guy you're arguing with uses.
Imagine thinking that just because someone says "no planes" were used that they must think Israel didn't do it. Imagine being such a feminine butthurt pussy that this is something you argue about.
No planes were used. None. Show me Flight 93. Faggot. Ahow me the plane that hit building 7. Faggot. AND Israel did it.
view the rest of the comments →
chrimony ago
This is the kind of stupid shit "truthers" spend their time on. A cruise missile hit the Pentagon, but planes flew into the Twin Towers? What kind of fucking sense does that make? Why don't you instead talk about the Dancing Israelis, who have names, faces, and FBI+police records?
bloodlibelisreal ago
No. No planes were used on 9-11.
samhain-grim ago
You’re retarded. I literally watched the second plane hit the tower. Not on video but with my own eyes.
I’m not saying the planes had passengers, or were hijacked, whatever. But a physical plane flew into building, regardless of how it was controlled.
beefartist ago
You're full of shit
cactusairforce ago
I remember that day an interviewee said he saw: "grey/silver planes with no windows hit the twin towers". I've never seen that again. Whose the only ones that use planes with no windows? The guvernment
bloodlibelisreal ago
Bull. Shit.
SerialLarper ago
Bullshit. Video editing doesn't push a hole into a buuilding.
https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-rfk-biWRz44/U635N8lZP4I/AAAAAAAAAMY/wXhoFBjg5_c/s1600/M.jpg
bloodlibelisreal ago
Neither does plastic and aluminum....
Can you tell me what's NOT in that picture? No pieces of aluminum wrapped around the steel/concrete? No plane parts. No chairs. No....nothing.
But the passports survived eh......
Fuck off Schlomo.
AdaptOrDie ago
It's the simplicity of it that really hits different.
SerialLarper ago
It does. A soft material can cut or erode a harder material with enough kinetic energy or over a long period of time. The photo even shows the cutoff point where the wingtips didn't have "enough energy to do this. The passports were obviously planted independently. There's no reason to believe you about "absolutely horizontal and vertical sections of the building"
Reverting to the "schlomo" ad hom only shows that you're a shithead who can't argue effectively.
bloodlibelisreal ago
Here's the problem with your dumb argument.
By the time the wings, and especially the tail section reached the building, they WOULD HAVE been going TOO SLOW, due to the torsion effect, to have penetrated hardened steel and concrete specifically designed to stop airplanes.
If they were real, the wings would have sheared off and fallen to the ground.
SerialLarper ago
Like I said, not enough kinetic energy, fuckwit.
bloodlibelisreal ago
Bull. Shit.
Are you an architect or an engineer? I doubt it. I am. If you are, you should know better.
Please explain to me and this entire national team of hundreds of architects and engineers how butter can go through a butter knife if itstmobinf fast enough https://www.ae911truth.org/
And you have not answered one question, Schlomo. Stop your pilpul.
SerialLarper ago
It's pretty simple. You make your hard material really thin and your soft material really fast. You keep increasing its velocity until it's kinetic energy is enough to overcome the bond energy of the border region around the impact area. Once you know that it's possible in theory it's just a case of putting real values into the equation to find out if it will happen in a particular situation or not.
And you can shove your schlomo up your arse, shithead.
bloodlibelisreal ago
Hey Schlomo it's NOT that simple. Once a big long object hits something as hard as steel, it starts to slow down immediately. By the time the weak ass plastic and aluminum wings would have gotten to the hardened steel, the object would have been going too slow for the wings to penetrate, evwn more so for the tail section.
Oh, actually it is simple if you're not a retarted Schlomo.
SerialLarper ago
The fact that the softer object starts to slow on impact doesn't affect the essential point that it's an energy argument, dipshit.
bloodlibelisreal ago
Once the object starts to slow down, it wouldn't have enough energy for the wings nor the tail section to pass through steel and concrete, dipshit.
SerialLarper ago
Shithead, that fact that something slows doesn't mean that is slower than an arbitrary value.
bloodlibelisreal ago
It would have been to slow for the aluminum and plastic wings to pass through hardened steel and concrete, Schlomo.
SerialLarper ago
You have no numbers to support that, airhead.
bloodlibelisreal ago
Oh but I do.
Study after study after study after study. Lots of em here
https://www.ae911truth.org/
SerialLarper ago
Links aren't numbers, fuckwit.
bloodlibelisreal ago
That link is full of studies, charts, calculations, diagrams and proof from architects and engineers who did the math that you won't look at sonyou can stay wrong in your fantasy world. Do I need to send you individual links to the 100 or so studies on that site or do you know how to internet? Willfully ignorant. Fuckwit.
SerialLarper ago
There's no reason to think that you know how to interpret what they wrote, shithead.
bloodlibelisreal ago
Im one of the engineers........
But I didn't post the link for you to worry about how I interpret it. I don't need to interpret it. I helped do some of the studies.
The link was for you, shithead.
SerialLarper ago
I'm not worried about it. You can't back up your claim because you're full of shit. Any asshole can pretend that that they have an authoritative source, your word has no value.
dat_face ago
Try this
https://www.bitchute.com/video/WFj8fNi4nPER/
SerialLarper ago
Yes, the video was edited. That doesn't mean that there were no planes that hit the building.
dat_face ago
LOL you actually are a Larper aren't you.
KIKE ALERT everybody. Be sure to tag.
SerialLarper ago
Keep believing that, loser.
dat_face ago
You're a right shitbag. Fuck you dude.
SerialLarper ago
Point out that you don't know what you're talking about doesn't make me a shitbag. Go cry to someone who cares, dipshit.
dat_face ago
Lol shilltard.
SerialLarper ago
The context speaks for itself. Anyone who accuses someone of being a kike because they lost an argument deserves contempt.
dat_face ago
But you lost the argument bro
SerialLarper ago
No, you have no answer for your non-sequitur. Here's my response again:
Yes, the video was edited. That doesn't mean that there were no planes that hit the building.
dat_face ago
lolno. You don't even have to watch 5 minutes of the video I provided. Where is your evidence to the contrary?
Why does it mean so much to you btw, Larper?
SerialLarper ago
Hole is the same size as a plane:
http://911research.wtc7.net/planes/analysis/docs/WTC_hole.jpg
Naudet footage has a plane, fireman hears it and looks up:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=miA8Td4oNcY
Zooope ago
Rip this link... You have this downloaded right?
dat_face ago
I have it downloaded from when it was on YT 😄
AdaptOrDie ago
You are correct sir. There were no airplanes that hit anything that day.
This reveals how well brainwashed people are to believe the cartoon physics ect..
chrimony ago
Peak stupidity.
AdaptOrDie ago
Don't be so hard on yourself goy.
bloodlibelisreal ago
Maybe you can explain how aluminum and plastic passes right through hardened steel and concrete?
Thats like saying butter can pass through a butter knife if you throw it fast enough.
Maybe you can explain how the wings, the weakest part of the plane, didn't hit the hardened steel and concrete and sheer right off and fall to the ground.
Maybe you can explain how there was zero torsion and that the tail section went into the building at the exact same speed as the extremely weak nose cone did. Ever see what a bird does to a nose cone of a plane...but these planes had hardened nose cones that can pass theough steel and concrete like butter. Riiiiiiiihhgt. Maybe you can explain how the planes parts disintegrated, but the passports didn't.
Maybe you can explain how the supposed plane that hit the pentagon was able to get so close to thw geound without knocking down any light poles or trees what-so-ever.
Maybe you can explain how there was no plane in the hole in PA Flight 93. Look up plane crashes on an image search. Look at lots and lots of them. Then look at the plane crash of Flight 93. What's missing?
Maybe you can explain how some guy got on his cell phone and called his wife from 34,000 feet to say "we're storming the cockpit, let's roll," and why (((hollywood))) was ready to make a movie out of that onbious hollywood script.
Maybe you can explain why the BBC reported that building 7 fell, 8 minutes before it actually fell. Speaking of building 7, maybe you can explain how a "paper fire" can heat up steel support framing in such a way that all load bearing supports simultaneously collapse causing the building to fall vertically. Same goes for the towers as well.
PEAK STUPIDITY is believing that any of that is actually possible. PEAK STUPIDITY is believing the official government and media story. We know they're all honest right....PEAK SHILL is shutting down any real questions and research online.
And I haven't even gotten started on the jews.......
chrimony ago
How can a hunk of metal traveling hundreds of miles per hour pass through a building with modest amounts of concrete and steel, and lots of glass windows? Is this the question you are asking?
Anything can pass though anything if you throw it fast enough. Even water can cut through steel at high enough velocity. Energy is proportional to velocity squared. But metal is not butter.
Maybe you can explain how we have multiple videos from independent sources showing planes flying into buildings, which matches the timing of hijackings.
Maybe you can explain why you want to distract with stupid shit like "no planes" instead of talking about the Dancing Israelis?
bloodlibelisreal ago
"Modest amounts of concrete and steel"
Obviously hasn't researched anything. 3 levels of the hardest steel ever produced at the time. Why were the windown so narrow?? Oh, because there was so much steel.
Lol
What a dumb ass.
bloodlibelisreal ago
Try this one before youtube takes it down.
Pay attention.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?feature=youtu.be&v=Rml2TL5N8ds
bloodlibelisreal ago
No. Water is hitting the steel at a constant velocity which is way faster than a fucking plane. Not only that, by the time the wings would have reached the building, rhey would have been going TOO SLOW to penetrate anything as hard as steel, because as soon as the "plane" hit it would have started to slow down. Even more so for the tail section.
No. Planes.
Did you do an image search for plane crashes? Did you then do an image search for the flight 93 crash? WHERE'S THE PLANE????
Did you explain how a barely trained "arab terrorist" can fly level to the ground and slam into the side of the pentagon without knocking down any telephone poles or trees??
No. Planes.
Seeking the truth is NOT a distraction. I hadn't wven gotten to the jews yet. The "dancing israeli's" isn't even the half of it.
There are NOT multiple videos from independent sources that show planes. The only videos that show planes come from the media. The other "independent source" videos just show explosions. Why does yourube keep taking actual original "independant source" videos where people say repeatedly it was a bomb, that there was NO PLANE!
chrimony ago
And the plane has much more mass than water. The point is when you talk about materials, but ignore mass and velocity for "impossible" things to happen, you show yourself to be ignorant.
But it's not a distraction? You refute yourself. You waste all this effort and discussion on stupid shit, that anybody with half a brain will dismiss, while ignoring the documented and irrefutable evidence of the Dancing Israelis. Everybody has heard about the supposed Muslims that were celebrating in New Jersey, when we know for a fact that citizens from our "Greatest Ally" were doing it. But go on, keep on talking about imaginary planes.
bloodlibelisreal ago
The mass and vocity have been taken into account and the official story is bullshit. Imagine believing the media and government and thinking that is makes you smart.
Here is a page with hundreds of actual architects and engineers, full of studies and graphs and charts that prove a plane cannot donwhat they say it did.
Prove them wrong.
https://www.ae911truth.org/
chrimony ago
Imagine denying basic video evidence from multiple sources and not understanding basic physics, and then coming up with a retarded idea about "no planes", and NOT talking about the Dancing Israelis, and thinking you're smart.
They say demolitions must have been involved. They don't say, "No planes were used on 9-11." Retard.
bloodlibelisreal ago
Imagine believing video evidence that came from the press. Imagine.
I already posted video proof as to why the video evidence came from 2 people, both of whom were "journalists." Im sure you didn't watch it though. Why think outside the official story amirite.
The rest of the actual day-of video shows no planes.
Why does youtube keep taking down the day-of videos where people on the street say they saw no planes.
Do yourself a favor. Really do it. Look ip plane crashes on your favorite image search. Look through page after page after page. Look at as many as you want for as long as you want. Then look at the flight 93 crash and tell me whats missing.....
Plus, why would the architects and engineers for 9-11 truth need to talk about explosions if "jet fuel melts steel beams?"
One more thing, go fuck yourself.
chrimony ago
Imagine thinking that not only were there no planes involved, but thinking that multiple press outlets were involved in your massive conspiracy theory to show fake video of planes flying into buildings. Imagine.
I didn't watch it because you've proven yourself to be retarded, and I was avoiding wasting time on a proven retard that distracts away from the Dancing Israelis with retarded ideas. But hey, if you insist, I can watch your retarded video and show that you are still retarded:
All right, so 4 minutes in of a 45 minute video and he claims, "With today's technology, making a live, realtime shot look like the CNN Hezarkhani shot would be impossible. But remember, the first time this was shown was many hours after the event."
You know what else was impossible, especially at the time? Faking that video within hours of the event to match up the events on the ground. And there are LOTS of videos, from independent sources, of the event. So you've got to have them all faked. That's why I call you retarded, because your conspiracy-addled brain can't sift through the most ridiculous claims to the most plausible ones, so you settle on the most ridiculous ones, while completely ignoring documented fact like the Dancing Israelis.
Jesus fucking Christ, the retard in you never ends. On top of "no planes", we've got the most cliche "truther" phrase of 9/11, jet fuel and steel beams. You really are a piece of work.
Right back at you.
bloodlibelisreal ago
Imagine it's 2020 and you still haven't realized that multiple lress putlets are in fact run by the same peopme and are in fact involved in massive conspiracy theories. Imagine being that dumb.
"I didn't watch the video because of you." Willfully ignorant. That's why they keep getting away with it. We have a country that lets the lress think for them and people who fight to stay in the matrix.
The technology was NOT impossible at the time. This shit is POSTJurassic Park. If you slow monthe OLD video with MODERN TECHNOLOGY you can see that the video is fake as fuck. Again, willfully ignorany.
You are a fucking retard.
Since you so fucking smart, who do you keep ifnoring building 7 and the COMETE LACK OF A PLANE IN PA??? Oh, and explain how you make a cell- phone call at 34,000 feet???
Or.....just keep pushing the official narrative and trying to convince people that the multiple press outlets don't work together and push giant conspiracy theories (including hollywood). Imagine it's 2020 and you still think the major press outlets are iNdEpEnDeNt. Fucking retard.
chrimony ago
Imagine being an idiot and buying into retarded conspiracies that involve an ever-expanding wave of people that need to be in on the conspiracy, in the most ridiculous fashion, involving fake planes and hoax videos of a massively public event in the middle of New York City, one of which occurred 15 minutes after the other and had countless eyes on it. YOU ARE A MASSIVE RETARD AND A WASTE OF TIME. Talk about the Dancing Israelis, you retard. Nah, don't do that, you might actually open people's eyes with documented evidence and show the truth about our "Greatest Ally". Keep on talking about retarded theories that anybody with half a brain dismisses.
I'm done here. I've wasted enough time on a retard.
bloodlibelisreal ago
Imagine it's 2020 and you still don't know about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq conspiracy, or the guld of tonkin conspiracy, or the holohoax conspiracy, and pushing the mainstream narrative.
Imagine believing 19 arabs with box cutters can hijack and overpower 4 planes full of people.
Imagine trying to make a point but ignoring building 7 and Flight 93 because it doesn't fir your narrative. If it doesn't fit, just ignore and call everyone names eight Schlomo?
Imagine thinking that birds destroy nose cones, but nose cones destroy steel.
Imagine being so butthurt that someone believes there were ZERO planes AND that the dancing Israeli's had something to do with it.
Imagine being such a butthurt unoriginal pussy that you have to steal the "imagine" line that the guy you're arguing with uses.
Imagine thinking that just because someone says "no planes" were used that they must think Israel didn't do it. Imagine being such a feminine butthurt pussy that this is something you argue about.
No planes were used. None. Show me Flight 93. Faggot. Ahow me the plane that hit building 7. Faggot. AND Israel did it.
Now go fuck yourself Schlomo.