When I first saw the towers burn on TV I knew the Jews did it and Muslims would be blamed for it. I tried convincing some of my American friends, but they would not believe until one told me that most Americans already knew the truth but are to scared to do anything about it
They are fools. There is no evidence of explosion, other than their own wishful thinking and fantasizing. There is, however, lots of evidence that two big fucking airplanes hit the Towers, such as video of the events and countless eyewitnesses. I don't know why this ridiculous conspiracy has gained so much traction, but I don't blame intellectuals for refusing to take it seriously, even though it has become quite stylish to do so. It's a fucking joke.
I have to wonder if the families of the victims filed petitions during the last administration to reopen the investigation. As I recall, it was a part, albeit a small fucker of a part of the last dude's platform. Once he was in office though, it was all hush hush from him and his fucking spineless ass supporters. Since it's the families of the victims, I'm willing to give them a pass because, hopefully, they did petition and it went nowhere and the media is eating the shit out of this to equate Bush with Trump which, no, there's no comparison. Bush was a total goofball and not in a good way. Obama didn't do shit. Trump on the other hand is doing whatever he can possibly do which is why I'm okay but cautious with him. Personally, I hope it happens. I hope the floodgates of info are opened the fuck up and Bush, Obama, The Clintons and anyone else involved in this bullshit find themselves in shit of the deepest sort. Realistically, I know it's going to be milked for frenzy and outrage and, generally speaking, marketing of a narrative of Republicans Are Eeeeeeevil bull shit.
Fuck You Neocons
Fuck You Too, SJW fucks.
You won't be able to fool me. I bore witness to the shit that followed.
The planes hit the buildings. The planes could have had explosives on them. The buildings had explosives and were rigged to blow. The plane that went down in the field that was supposed to hit the white house was shot down by an F-15 and no one board fought the hijackers. And i don't think a plane hit the pentagon, i think it was a cruise missile or a drone. I say it was a cruise missile because a submarine fired cruise missile would be more explosive and practical and then the submarine could vanish easier. WTC 7 was rigged too blow and WTC 7 had a lot to do with alphabet soup agencies and spies and intel agencies using the building for planning and operations and nefarious deeds and the intel agencies needed to destroy building 7.
It was a group effort, actually. Mostly jews, a bunch of arabs, and a few white males. I'm starting to think you were being facetious when you chose your username.
People act like 2 planes didn't crash into the fucking buildings. How many people would it take to plant the explosives? How many floors had explosives? Where were they placed? Who were the people that would have planted the explosives? The only type that could pull this off are the SF types, and the ones I know wouldn't have done shit like this. And for all you out there who say diesel can't melt steel need to educate yourselves on blacksmithing because getting metal red hot makes it soft enough to be bent by hand, easily. I've seen tanker fires cause concrete bridges to fail, that fuel can't reach temperatures to melt rocks either.
Even if it did melt the beams the top 15 floors of tower one collapsing, would have been met by the equal and opposite force of the 15 floors below, thus holding them up. That's the laws of physics.
That didn't happen though, and explosive charges were seen blasting all the way to the bottom.
You can stand on an egg, but if you stomp on it you'll crush it. Your reasoning is wrong, you've confused static and dynamic forces. The momentum of the top floors made it a battering ram. Car accidents crush near the point of impact. Go pound on a soft metal stake in hard ground, you'll see peening at the impact site and plastic deformation near the top.
The dynamic load would and should have lost energy required to push the steel over tolerance for every floor encountered. I have another theory - the steel and concrete were complete substandard shit. Both towers should have been able to withstand a plane impact and fire, unless the construction of the buildings in the WTC complex used shady cheap materials. It would also explain why 7 came down due to debris and fire alone, and why the crime scene was cleaned up without any evidence preserved. It also begs the question on how many other tall buildings are in the same boat if true.
No idea, never put any thought into it. Why go though the extra hassle, the 2 larger buildings came down and the skyline was forever changed. Why even target a short building in the same area if explosives were going to be used. If the plan was to use explosives why stop at the wtc buildings. Hell why even blow them up from the inside, 5 or 6 Oklahoma city style van bombs would have done the trick much easier. Where did the explosives come from? The military? Fucking Chelsea manning leaked all kinds of shit, this kinda stuff can't be kept under wraps. Look at all the leaks coming from Trump's administration, that shit leaks like a sieve, and the crap that's leaked is a millionth less juicy.
Please spend some time on this. If you really care to know the truth, there are tons of resources out there. Don't be so quick to dismiss it. All of your arguments have been refuted ad nauseam. If you need a good place to start, check out "Another Nineteen" by Kevin Robert Ryan and "Solving 9-11" by Christopher Bollyn.
I was going to call you a shill, however, I read through your profile. So i will say this, look at your comment really read it. you dismiss WTC 7 with no thought. How did a building that was in no way damaged fall like it was on purpose?
I have demolitions experience, I've gotten to blow up all kinds of shit. Best I ever got to set off was 800 pounds of bangalore torpedoes in one shot. I've watched the videos, I didn't see any evidence. Shape charges and breaching charges could be tamped down with water or blankets, and you wouldn't see them. Iv bag taped to a charge stuck on a wall sprays water backwards, but directs the force forwards. Pros would be able to hide their work, which is why I think everyone eyes are lying to them.
TNT isn't explosive enough to cut a tree and it won't cut metal which leaves rdx/c4 . 7 hours of fires would have lit c4 on fire rendering it useless and the demolition would have been more chaotic and not as complete. If it was the government / military and the plan would be to lie anyway, why risk detection planting charges in the inside f the building when a tim McVeigh would be just as effective.
My point is this. If it was an inside job then the execution was perfect, despite a thousand moving parts nothing there was no major mistakes. The were no charges weren't stumbled upon. They all remained intact with raging fires all around them. There were no significant premature detonations, every single charge was set off at the correct time. Plans that sophisticated never work.
The triggering device would have to be radio, since it wouldn't have been possible to daisy chain det cord to everything. If they were shielded for fires and water would have made them so bulky it would have taken a large crew to get everything in place in a few days otherwise the risk of discovery would have grown exponentially the more time before the attack lapsed. It doesn't make sense to me to engage in all the extra risk of detection, risk of whistle blowers, risk of failure when the planes would be enough. Why not add a dirty bomb to the planes if the goal was war. There were no bombs at the pentagon, and would there be bombs where flight 93 what was the target, would they set up charges for that target and if so who removed them? Nobody stumbled upon them at a time of heightened vigilance?
As far as how a building can fall like that, regardless if you believe the NIST simulation is a red herring or an attempt at a cover up, the simulation is sound.
building 7 was one of the ''operations center'', had the room where the rigged small scale nuclear explosives for both towers (built-in the WTC towers as a last resort preventive measure, as per building regulations) could be activated (actually launched from a tunnel). this explains the order of destruction (the first building to be hit by a plane was the last to fall, the complex demolition process was hardwired by the original engineers and couldn't be changed on the fly by the plotters) and the almost exact 30 minutes delay between both buildings demolition.
some speculate that it might also have contained a blackmail data/communication center to neutralize whistleblowers or people in the way of the operation, but this remains speculation as far as i can tell. but bottom line is building 7 contained embarrassing evidence or clues that had to go to get the official narrative going.
It wouldn't have to be nuclear, this is way to risky anyone could detect the fallout. People carry dose badges that work with x rays that would have indicated radiation from such a thing. Explosives to destroy hard drives is risky the data is recoverable if the platters are not disintegrated. The Columbia explosion partially destroyed some hard drives, but there was data recovered. Magnetic wiping is not 100% effective either due to hysteres, so that wouldn't work either. The only sure way to erase a hard drive is to heat it to the Curie temperature with thermite. Why wait for a terrorist attack to destroy information when clandestine destruction would make more sense.
rescue workers did have dose badges (but werent told it was for nuclear radiation), were pulled from the site every x hours or according to readings, and most of them got pretty sick in the years afterwards due to mysterious illnesses. most intelligence agencies or valued agents working on the site were wearing hazmat suits.
as for the data, if they were able to take the remaining buildings 1 and 2 steel beams to fresh kills island and ship it to china before the end of the 9/11 investigation, they could have restricted access to the building 7 site, remove any remaining undesirable evidence by trusted agents and disperse it out of view and destroy it safely offsite.
While I agree the towers were controlled demolition, good luck having this go anywhere. (((They))) own it all - the courts, NIST, the Justice Department, all of it.
I think somebody pulled the trigger and collapsed the towers. They don’t want us rabble to know that tall buildings are rigged to collapse. If the two towers toppled over and killed 10s of thousands that would be way worse then just one ore two buildings collapsing on themselves. The attack was real, the collapse was orchestrated to prevent even more damage. The conspiracy is that our tallest buildings are all rigged to blow just in case.
For the longest time I've said that the 'attacks' (hijackings) were organic and the US knew about them. Instead of stopping them they decided to use them and enhance them to achieve goals.
For people who think this is far fetched think of a relationship. The male finds out (goes through phone/hears from friends) that the female is going to cheat on him. He knows the when and where. He can either a) stop this from happening, or b) catch her in the act to benefit him in the divorce proceedings. If anyone has a better example I would love to hear it as it's the easiest way to convince normies that there might be more than meets the eye.
Tall buildings don't fall over. This can be observed in smaller structures. Known as the chimney effect as it is often seen in collapsing chimneys. They will break in mid fall rather than fall over like a tree. On a larger scale, a building will do the same thing and appear to fall in its own footprint. Except in China where they over build the walls instead of the support columns and then the whole building can topple over.
Or they don’t fall over because they are rigged to implode on themselves? Yeah, I know they are designed to be stable and most of the CG is lower to the ground or below it due to deep piling. San Francisco has a multimillion dollar tower that is in the process of falling over. It might take decades but it’s coming down.
I've rarely traveled by air, but have flown into Denver several times the last few months, and driven to/from the place a few more. That's like a full size underground city, huh? There's what looks like new giant hills around every time I go there and convoys of dump trucks.
Definitely. Washington DC, too. Its rumored that the "earthquake" that happened in DC was them putting a mini nuke off to make a large cavern add-on to what's already there.
I've heard those rumors too. I would bet it has more to do with building D.U.M.B.S.. Take this machine, for example: https://kek.gg/i/3LyhSJ.jpg
This is just the one they showed the public. Now imagine the ones they don't. I would bet there's tunnels that go all over the world with high speed rails for the elites. I'm fairly certain there is one that goes from NY to Cali
What's next? Will Facebook finally be outed for tracking too much personal info? Google?
It feels like we need faster shipping times on red pills. 10 to 15 years is a long time to wait.
I have traveled the world and have yet to find a place that was not utterly redefined by that date. I feel sorry for those whom never lived before this as they simply do not understand the gravitas of the changes, the daily infringement on civil liberties.
jesus_is_lord ago
. https://voat.co/v/Conspiracy/2531091
Trapezoidal ago
When I first saw the towers burn on TV I knew the Jews did it and Muslims would be blamed for it. I tried convincing some of my American friends, but they would not believe until one told me that most Americans already knew the truth but are to scared to do anything about it
JonReed ago
alex jones is a libtard faggot lunatic who idiot listeners think is right wing.
ardvarcus ago
They are fools. There is no evidence of explosion, other than their own wishful thinking and fantasizing. There is, however, lots of evidence that two big fucking airplanes hit the Towers, such as video of the events and countless eyewitnesses. I don't know why this ridiculous conspiracy has gained so much traction, but I don't blame intellectuals for refusing to take it seriously, even though it has become quite stylish to do so. It's a fucking joke.
Kal ago
and building 7?
CowboyXero ago
I have to wonder if the families of the victims filed petitions during the last administration to reopen the investigation. As I recall, it was a part, albeit a small fucker of a part of the last dude's platform. Once he was in office though, it was all hush hush from him and his fucking spineless ass supporters. Since it's the families of the victims, I'm willing to give them a pass because, hopefully, they did petition and it went nowhere and the media is eating the shit out of this to equate Bush with Trump which, no, there's no comparison. Bush was a total goofball and not in a good way. Obama didn't do shit. Trump on the other hand is doing whatever he can possibly do which is why I'm okay but cautious with him. Personally, I hope it happens. I hope the floodgates of info are opened the fuck up and Bush, Obama, The Clintons and anyone else involved in this bullshit find themselves in shit of the deepest sort. Realistically, I know it's going to be milked for frenzy and outrage and, generally speaking, marketing of a narrative of Republicans Are Eeeeeeevil bull shit.
Fuck You Neocons
Fuck You Too, SJW fucks.
You won't be able to fool me. I bore witness to the shit that followed.
dooob ago
Can we stop with the zionism blackpilling, you could instead raise awareness, Jews cant stop what the goyim knows.
RampancyLambentRaven ago
The planes hit the buildings. The planes could have had explosives on them. The buildings had explosives and were rigged to blow. The plane that went down in the field that was supposed to hit the white house was shot down by an F-15 and no one board fought the hijackers. And i don't think a plane hit the pentagon, i think it was a cruise missile or a drone. I say it was a cruise missile because a submarine fired cruise missile would be more explosive and practical and then the submarine could vanish easier. WTC 7 was rigged too blow and WTC 7 had a lot to do with alphabet soup agencies and spies and intel agencies using the building for planning and operations and nefarious deeds and the intel agencies needed to destroy building 7.
EngelbertHumperdinck ago
Your textbook was clearly written by jews.
PeacefulAssassin ago
we will soon find their names on the obituaries.
Dispatched ago
the game is rigged
EngelbertHumperdinck ago
It was a group effort, actually. Mostly jews, a bunch of arabs, and a few white males. I'm starting to think you were being facetious when you chose your username.
River_Otter ago
I watched a lot of people I once knew die that day. They were, to the globalists, "expendible losses", for their gain.
The ones who orchestrated this are the whore of babylon. May God have mercy on their souls, because I struggle to find any.
MillstoneNecklace ago
Draw and quarter the lot of them and put their heads on pikes, because that is how you deal with traitors.
VicariousJambi ago
https://imgoat.com/uploads/8d30a95947/83693.jpg
TheAntiZealot ago
They were far from "expendable losses"
They were closer to trophies.
But more accurately, they were a blood offering. A sacrifice. They were actually very important to the plan. It was a feast for their god.
Sacrificing a single baby would not have been a large, significant, nor symbolic enough of an offering to set the plan in motion.
They needed something bigger. And it needed to be on a specific day.
DehumanizeYourself ago
Oy vey! There's no need for that, goy, haven't we beaten this one to death!
bman0321 ago
People act like 2 planes didn't crash into the fucking buildings. How many people would it take to plant the explosives? How many floors had explosives? Where were they placed? Who were the people that would have planted the explosives? The only type that could pull this off are the SF types, and the ones I know wouldn't have done shit like this. And for all you out there who say diesel can't melt steel need to educate yourselves on blacksmithing because getting metal red hot makes it soft enough to be bent by hand, easily. I've seen tanker fires cause concrete bridges to fail, that fuel can't reach temperatures to melt rocks either.
Karl_Von_Dibble ago
Yep. Touch the steel of a car wreck shortly after it occurs and it will burn your hand just from the effects of force.
IIJOSEPHXII ago
Even if it did melt the beams the top 15 floors of tower one collapsing, would have been met by the equal and opposite force of the 15 floors below, thus holding them up. That's the laws of physics.
That didn't happen though, and explosive charges were seen blasting all the way to the bottom.
bman0321 ago
You can stand on an egg, but if you stomp on it you'll crush it. Your reasoning is wrong, you've confused static and dynamic forces. The momentum of the top floors made it a battering ram. Car accidents crush near the point of impact. Go pound on a soft metal stake in hard ground, you'll see peening at the impact site and plastic deformation near the top.
exi1ed0ne ago
The dynamic load would and should have lost energy required to push the steel over tolerance for every floor encountered. I have another theory - the steel and concrete were complete substandard shit. Both towers should have been able to withstand a plane impact and fire, unless the construction of the buildings in the WTC complex used shady cheap materials. It would also explain why 7 came down due to debris and fire alone, and why the crime scene was cleaned up without any evidence preserved. It also begs the question on how many other tall buildings are in the same boat if true.
bman0321 ago
I saw a video of a mall collapse in Korea I think, the building fell after a few years, not the same thing but similar to what your saying.
ViperCarbz ago
Optical illusions created by CIA laser trucks on the ground.
bman0321 ago
If you said Criss Angel mindfreak I would have believed you, that guy is a wizard.
AncienRegimePremysyl ago
What's your reasoning for WTC 7, then?
bman0321 ago
No idea, never put any thought into it. Why go though the extra hassle, the 2 larger buildings came down and the skyline was forever changed. Why even target a short building in the same area if explosives were going to be used. If the plan was to use explosives why stop at the wtc buildings. Hell why even blow them up from the inside, 5 or 6 Oklahoma city style van bombs would have done the trick much easier. Where did the explosives come from? The military? Fucking Chelsea manning leaked all kinds of shit, this kinda stuff can't be kept under wraps. Look at all the leaks coming from Trump's administration, that shit leaks like a sieve, and the crap that's leaked is a millionth less juicy.
AncienRegimePremysyl ago
How can you say it leaks like a sieve without knowing the amount of data not being leaked?
EngelbertHumperdinck ago
Please spend some time on this. If you really care to know the truth, there are tons of resources out there. Don't be so quick to dismiss it. All of your arguments have been refuted ad nauseam. If you need a good place to start, check out "Another Nineteen" by Kevin Robert Ryan and "Solving 9-11" by Christopher Bollyn.
Tangent-love ago
I was going to call you a shill, however, I read through your profile. So i will say this, look at your comment really read it. you dismiss WTC 7 with no thought. How did a building that was in no way damaged fall like it was on purpose?
bman0321 ago
I have demolitions experience, I've gotten to blow up all kinds of shit. Best I ever got to set off was 800 pounds of bangalore torpedoes in one shot. I've watched the videos, I didn't see any evidence. Shape charges and breaching charges could be tamped down with water or blankets, and you wouldn't see them. Iv bag taped to a charge stuck on a wall sprays water backwards, but directs the force forwards. Pros would be able to hide their work, which is why I think everyone eyes are lying to them.
TNT isn't explosive enough to cut a tree and it won't cut metal which leaves rdx/c4 . 7 hours of fires would have lit c4 on fire rendering it useless and the demolition would have been more chaotic and not as complete. If it was the government / military and the plan would be to lie anyway, why risk detection planting charges in the inside f the building when a tim McVeigh would be just as effective.
My point is this. If it was an inside job then the execution was perfect, despite a thousand moving parts nothing there was no major mistakes. The were no charges weren't stumbled upon. They all remained intact with raging fires all around them. There were no significant premature detonations, every single charge was set off at the correct time. Plans that sophisticated never work.
The triggering device would have to be radio, since it wouldn't have been possible to daisy chain det cord to everything. If they were shielded for fires and water would have made them so bulky it would have taken a large crew to get everything in place in a few days otherwise the risk of discovery would have grown exponentially the more time before the attack lapsed. It doesn't make sense to me to engage in all the extra risk of detection, risk of whistle blowers, risk of failure when the planes would be enough. Why not add a dirty bomb to the planes if the goal was war. There were no bombs at the pentagon, and would there be bombs where flight 93 what was the target, would they set up charges for that target and if so who removed them? Nobody stumbled upon them at a time of heightened vigilance?
As far as how a building can fall like that, regardless if you believe the NIST simulation is a red herring or an attempt at a cover up, the simulation is sound.
chowmetal92 ago
building 7 was one of the ''operations center'', had the room where the rigged small scale nuclear explosives for both towers (built-in the WTC towers as a last resort preventive measure, as per building regulations) could be activated (actually launched from a tunnel). this explains the order of destruction (the first building to be hit by a plane was the last to fall, the complex demolition process was hardwired by the original engineers and couldn't be changed on the fly by the plotters) and the almost exact 30 minutes delay between both buildings demolition.
some speculate that it might also have contained a blackmail data/communication center to neutralize whistleblowers or people in the way of the operation, but this remains speculation as far as i can tell. but bottom line is building 7 contained embarrassing evidence or clues that had to go to get the official narrative going.
bman0321 ago
It wouldn't have to be nuclear, this is way to risky anyone could detect the fallout. People carry dose badges that work with x rays that would have indicated radiation from such a thing. Explosives to destroy hard drives is risky the data is recoverable if the platters are not disintegrated. The Columbia explosion partially destroyed some hard drives, but there was data recovered. Magnetic wiping is not 100% effective either due to hysteres, so that wouldn't work either. The only sure way to erase a hard drive is to heat it to the Curie temperature with thermite. Why wait for a terrorist attack to destroy information when clandestine destruction would make more sense.
chowmetal92 ago
rescue workers did have dose badges (but werent told it was for nuclear radiation), were pulled from the site every x hours or according to readings, and most of them got pretty sick in the years afterwards due to
mysterious illnesses. most intelligence agencies or valued agents working on the site were wearing hazmat suits.as for the data, if they were able to take the remaining buildings 1 and 2 steel beams to fresh kills island and ship it to china before the end of the 9/11 investigation, they could have restricted access to the building 7 site, remove any remaining undesirable evidence by trusted agents and disperse it out of view and destroy it safely offsite.
CheeseboogersGhost ago
and this (((investigation))) will find that jews had nothing to do with it and that 26 gorillion jews died in the holohoax oy vey
mrfetus ago
I read this in a jews voice. I like you, but fuck you.
VicariousJambi ago
https://hooktube.com/watch?v=v09h2gqhnKM
mrfetus ago
GAHHHHHHAHHHHH
CheeseboogersGhost ago
lol
PrettyBigDouche ago
While I agree the towers were controlled demolition, good luck having this go anywhere. (((They))) own it all - the courts, NIST, the Justice Department, all of it.
ColaEuphoria ago
The Jewish bogeymen are everywhere!
Dudesocks ago
Soon they will all be in camps.
KILLtheRATS ago
Day B so big N pawafull.
PrettyBigDouche ago
Can't tell if serious or facetious. But in either case, go fuck yourself. Seriously. lol.
Adminstrater ago
Five Dancing Israelis Arrested On 9/11
pizza_mine ago
I think somebody pulled the trigger and collapsed the towers. They don’t want us rabble to know that tall buildings are rigged to collapse. If the two towers toppled over and killed 10s of thousands that would be way worse then just one ore two buildings collapsing on themselves. The attack was real, the collapse was orchestrated to prevent even more damage. The conspiracy is that our tallest buildings are all rigged to blow just in case.
hels ago
For the longest time I've said that the 'attacks' (hijackings) were organic and the US knew about them. Instead of stopping them they decided to use them and enhance them to achieve goals.
For people who think this is far fetched think of a relationship. The male finds out (goes through phone/hears from friends) that the female is going to cheat on him. He knows the when and where. He can either a) stop this from happening, or b) catch her in the act to benefit him in the divorce proceedings. If anyone has a better example I would love to hear it as it's the easiest way to convince normies that there might be more than meets the eye.
kalgon ago
"The conspiracy is that our tallest buildings are all rigged to blow just in case."
Except explosives have an expiration date, you can't just stuff them in concrete to detonate them years later, just in case
lipids ago
Tall buildings don't fall over. This can be observed in smaller structures. Known as the chimney effect as it is often seen in collapsing chimneys. They will break in mid fall rather than fall over like a tree. On a larger scale, a building will do the same thing and appear to fall in its own footprint. Except in China where they over build the walls instead of the support columns and then the whole building can topple over.
pizza_mine ago
Or they don’t fall over because they are rigged to implode on themselves? Yeah, I know they are designed to be stable and most of the CG is lower to the ground or below it due to deep piling. San Francisco has a multimillion dollar tower that is in the process of falling over. It might take decades but it’s coming down.
CheeseboogersGhost ago
Isn't there a photo floating around of the Israeli art students holding blasting caps?
GizaDog ago
Its time to expose all the DUMB's too!
GenghisSean ago
What does that stand for?
Derpfroot ago
Dicks Under My Balls
or
Deep Underground Military Base
Your choice.
GizaDog ago
Hmmmm. I hate Choices
CheeseboogersGhost ago
I have been for over 20 years. I actually wrote a few great pieces about it but wont dox myself. The info is out there....somewhere
GizaDog ago
Thats not much help but we know its true. Phil Schneider has exposed some of them.
Negro_Nazi ago
Philly Schneider was awesome
ReginaldPluntfarb ago
I've rarely traveled by air, but have flown into Denver several times the last few months, and driven to/from the place a few more. That's like a full size underground city, huh? There's what looks like new giant hills around every time I go there and convoys of dump trucks.
CheeseboogersGhost ago
Definitely. Washington DC, too. Its rumored that the "earthquake" that happened in DC was them putting a mini nuke off to make a large cavern add-on to what's already there.
EvilSeagull ago
There's this article on Thetruthdenied.com that claims there is a war going on underground. The website doesn't look very reliable, but who knows.
CheeseboogersGhost ago
I've heard those rumors too. I would bet it has more to do with building D.U.M.B.S.. Take this machine, for example: https://kek.gg/i/3LyhSJ.jpg
This is just the one they showed the public. Now imagine the ones they don't. I would bet there's tunnels that go all over the world with high speed rails for the elites. I'm fairly certain there is one that goes from NY to Cali
EvilSeagull ago
There's a map of these facilities in the US and some do show tunnels connecting them.
doubleunder ago
What's next? Will Facebook finally be outed for tracking too much personal info? Google? It feels like we need faster shipping times on red pills. 10 to 15 years is a long time to wait.
lipids ago
Oy vey, stopping Facebook from building data is government overreach. Can't have government get in the way of the free market.
nomadriders ago
As they should. Sadly many victims families have died of suspicious circumstances already.
Syndicalism ago
Everyone in the world is an indirect victim of this. Its never too late to bring justice to 9/11.
LostandFound ago
I have traveled the world and have yet to find a place that was not utterly redefined by that date. I feel sorry for those whom never lived before this as they simply do not understand the gravitas of the changes, the daily infringement on civil liberties.