You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

bman0321 ago

People act like 2 planes didn't crash into the fucking buildings. How many people would it take to plant the explosives? How many floors had explosives? Where were they placed? Who were the people that would have planted the explosives? The only type that could pull this off are the SF types, and the ones I know wouldn't have done shit like this. And for all you out there who say diesel can't melt steel need to educate yourselves on blacksmithing because getting metal red hot makes it soft enough to be bent by hand, easily. I've seen tanker fires cause concrete bridges to fail, that fuel can't reach temperatures to melt rocks either.

AncienRegimePremysyl ago

What's your reasoning for WTC 7, then?

bman0321 ago

No idea, never put any thought into it. Why go though the extra hassle, the 2 larger buildings came down and the skyline was forever changed. Why even target a short building in the same area if explosives were going to be used. If the plan was to use explosives why stop at the wtc buildings. Hell why even blow them up from the inside, 5 or 6 Oklahoma city style van bombs would have done the trick much easier. Where did the explosives come from? The military? Fucking Chelsea manning leaked all kinds of shit, this kinda stuff can't be kept under wraps. Look at all the leaks coming from Trump's administration, that shit leaks like a sieve, and the crap that's leaked is a millionth less juicy.

EngelbertHumperdinck ago

never put any thought into it

Please spend some time on this. If you really care to know the truth, there are tons of resources out there. Don't be so quick to dismiss it. All of your arguments have been refuted ad nauseam. If you need a good place to start, check out "Another Nineteen" by Kevin Robert Ryan and "Solving 9-11" by Christopher Bollyn.