After replying to the propaganda shit that my friends share on facebook, I don't think they even read the titles, they just share because they like the colors or something.
Its weird, cause I always felt like having a comment section bennifited the site, as it allowed them to astroturf the discussion. Maybe they just realized how transparent those shills can be.
Either way, its no loss imo. Nothing productive ever comes from thoose comment sections. They actually manage to make youtube look good...
Yeah, the progressive newsblogs started it to avoid people "harassing" them by disagreeing with their poorly researched and thought out positions. The practice floated up the chain from there.
I see it as a natural progression of things. Each MSM outlet has their own voice or agenda, and people on the internet, in general, are retards; VOAT being the exception.
Have you noticed how much cancer you get by reading some of those? If I were working for even the most outlandish, shilled MSM, I would do the same. It's a sad reflection on the state of the human race. Not much to see, really.
I only ever read the Voat comments under the link, I rarely care about what's under the actual article on their site. Even before being banned entirely, the sites were moderating heavily.
What? Give me a break man! We do fine, just please dont forget to buy Clorox wipes that kill 99.9% of germs or i'll be out of a job. (Gotta meet that quota! Hail corporate!)
Suppression of narrative-destroying discussion is paramount to any mainstream "news" outlet. They're paid to make you think something by exposing you to only their views.
Doctor_Du_Nuffins ago
Some of them still allow Disqus (e.g. ABC News which is arguably the worst of the worst) but those are disappearing..
PM_me_your_mitts ago
They either disable comments or they ask you to have your facebook directly linked to your comments.
ZF_1 ago
I thought i was the only one who noticed.
ezralv ago
After replying to the propaganda shit that my friends share on facebook, I don't think they even read the titles, they just share because they like the colors or something.
Sciency ago
Its weird, cause I always felt like having a comment section bennifited the site, as it allowed them to astroturf the discussion. Maybe they just realized how transparent those shills can be.
Either way, its no loss imo. Nothing productive ever comes from thoose comment sections. They actually manage to make youtube look good...
ezralv ago
liberals mostly just read headlines.
ezralv ago
Yeah, the progressive newsblogs started it to avoid people "harassing" them by disagreeing with their poorly researched and thought out positions. The practice floated up the chain from there.
GizaDog ago
It's been like that for years.
GizaDog ago
CNN.com started it. Others followed.
onezeno ago
Because so many in the west are becoming right wing.
1moar ago
I see it as a natural progression of things. Each MSM outlet has their own voice or agenda, and people on the internet, in general, are retards; VOAT being the exception.
Have you noticed how much cancer you get by reading some of those? If I were working for even the most outlandish, shilled MSM, I would do the same. It's a sad reflection on the state of the human race. Not much to see, really.
lxbb ago
I only ever read the Voat comments under the link, I rarely care about what's under the actual article on their site. Even before being banned entirely, the sites were moderating heavily.
hypersong ago
That is a keen observation. I normally don't venture onto mainstream media, and less likely to comment based on the quality of most articles.
Crensch ago
Yes. The truth is reaching critical mass, and they're having to resort to more draconian measures than usual. Their paid shills are no longer useful.
jerry ago
What? Give me a break man! We do fine, just please dont forget to buy Clorox wipes that kill 99.9% of germs or i'll be out of a job. (Gotta meet that quota! Hail corporate!)
Crensch ago
Suppression of narrative-destroying discussion is paramount to any mainstream "news" outlet. They're paid to make you think something by exposing you to only their views.