He fought tooth and nail against total transparency. I thought it was because he didn’t want to be caught as a deleting asshole but it was really because he knew Team Srayzie has multiple alts and they were causing problems.
He fought tooth and nail against total transparency.
Complete lie. Never happened once. I simply observed that you were afraid of transparency and you latched onto complete transparency in a counter-narrative.
I'll happily acknowledge I fully support ALL transparency, including complete transparency and the restoration of 100% of my deleted posts.
Your move, Israel faggot.
P.S. @crensch@kevdude@nadeshda@heygeorge (deleted and re-posted because I misspelled heygeorge and just recently found out editing with names doesn't ping them)
You can’t prove it anymore because all those comments are deleted. You are lying to cover your ass!
Double lie, now you got caught. I haven't deleted anything for over a month, and you're talking about the conversations since then.
No, you only supported from X day forward. I’m the one who said open the can of worms. My history proves it.
Prove it. Show the evidence. You're the one who pivoted to change the subject to "full transparency", and then declared Putt would never do it. I fully support full transparency, including the full restoration of all my deleted post history. Now what, Israel faggot?
Actually, since we both know you can't prove it with evidence, allow me to demonstrate:
"Look, your transparency only deals with possible problems that were created by having votes to begin with. I want full retroactive transparency to burn all the fuckers who were on vote brigades. Trust me, the good guys started a lot of the shit and shit posters reacted. Simple." - WhiteRonin (source)
And, of course:
"You don’t get it. I was saying full retroactive transparency because it would create such a shit storm it would be epic." -WhiteRonin (source)
It's easy. It demonstrates how you use full transparency only as a counter narrative, you yourself even parrot that you only want it to troll. Most importantly, You cannot prove I ever disagreed not because I deleted the comments as you seem to elude to, but because I've never said I disagree.
Check mate, Israel faggot. You only use "full transparency" as a troll and counter-narrative to the future voting transparency you fear so much, because it would show your actions for what they are.
For the final time, I 100% support all forms of voting transparency, in whatever fashion being future or retroactive, in addition to 100% restoration of my deleted posts.
There is no further move to play, you've lost the game Israel faggot. Hope your H1B visa expires and you go back to your own shithole country.
I fully support full transparency, including the full restoration of all my deleted post history. Now what, Israel faggot?
Can deleted posts and comments be recovered indefinitely or at all? @SearchVoat
If you do support this and it is possible then I would also support it as it would prove many of the interactions we've had in the past that you denied we had (no throwing you a low blow - just saying)
But if it is not possible it just seems as a comment posted in order to divert from the criticism. Just, saying.
Maybe you have a better tech knowledge than I do u/virge. Would a website that had content deleted keep a record on this deleted content (posts and comments) and be able to restore it?
If it has it would imply a massive work load I would assume because not only the ones that do the work would also need to make sure to leave the doxxing posts and comments out of that.
To be clear, I was only covering my position based on the accusations WhiteRonin uses to pivot conversations and put people on the defensive when he's losing an argument while being a subverisve troll faggot for Israel.
Put simply, all of you collectively have different opinions of why I deleted my posts, and so far you're all collectively wrong so I'm not afraid of them being restored in the first place.
Well that is applying guilty by association, you know I don't do that. Any difference you have with u/WhiteRonin you will have to resolve them yourself with him.
view the rest of the comments →
WhiteRonin ago
He fought tooth and nail against total transparency. I thought it was because he didn’t want to be caught as a deleting asshole but it was really because he knew Team Srayzie has multiple alts and they were causing problems.
virge ago
Complete lie. Never happened once. I simply observed that you were afraid of transparency and you latched onto complete transparency in a counter-narrative.
I'll happily acknowledge I fully support ALL transparency, including complete transparency and the restoration of 100% of my deleted posts.
Your move, Israel faggot.
P.S. @crensch @kevdude @nadeshda @heygeorge (deleted and re-posted because I misspelled heygeorge and just recently found out editing with names doesn't ping them)
WhiteRonin ago
You can’t prove it anymore because all those comments are deleted. You are lying to cover your ass!
No, you only supported from X day forward. I’m the one who said open the can of worms. My history proves it.
virge ago
Double lie, now you got caught. I haven't deleted anything for over a month, and you're talking about the conversations since then.
Prove it. Show the evidence. You're the one who pivoted to change the subject to "full transparency", and then declared Putt would never do it. I fully support full transparency, including the full restoration of all my deleted post history. Now what, Israel faggot?
You're a liar. It's that simple.
@crensch @kevdude @nadeshda @heygeorge further evidence.
WhiteRonin ago
You linked to the proof yourself dumb ass!
virge ago
Actually, since we both know you can't prove it with evidence, allow me to demonstrate:
And, of course:
It's easy. It demonstrates how you use full transparency only as a counter narrative, you yourself even parrot that you only want it to troll. Most importantly, You cannot prove I ever disagreed not because I deleted the comments as you seem to elude to, but because I've never said I disagree.
Check mate, Israel faggot. You only use "full transparency" as a troll and counter-narrative to the future voting transparency you fear so much, because it would show your actions for what they are.
For the final time, I 100% support all forms of voting transparency, in whatever fashion being future or retroactive, in addition to 100% restoration of my deleted posts.
There is no further move to play, you've lost the game Israel faggot. Hope your H1B visa expires and you go back to your own shithole country.
@crensch @kevdude @nadeshda @heygeorge I rest my case.
virge ago
@sguevar @Nosferatjew @gabara @TruthDefender
Because I'm neutral in all this, ultimately.
sguevar ago
Thanks for the ping.
I have quite a doubt here:
Can deleted posts and comments be recovered indefinitely or at all? @SearchVoat
If you do support this and it is possible then I would also support it as it would prove many of the interactions we've had in the past that you denied we had (no throwing you a low blow - just saying)
But if it is not possible it just seems as a comment posted in order to divert from the criticism. Just, saying.
Maybe you have a better tech knowledge than I do u/virge. Would a website that had content deleted keep a record on this deleted content (posts and comments) and be able to restore it?
If it has it would imply a massive work load I would assume because not only the ones that do the work would also need to make sure to leave the doxxing posts and comments out of that.
Maybe u/MadWorld or u/PeaceSeeker or even @Puttitout or @Cynabuns can clarify this doubt if you can't.
virge ago
I don't know. Regardless, I'd still support it.
sguevar ago
Fair enough. Thanks for the answer.
virge ago
To be clear, I was only covering my position based on the accusations WhiteRonin uses to pivot conversations and put people on the defensive when he's losing an argument while being a subverisve troll faggot for Israel.
Put simply, all of you collectively have different opinions of why I deleted my posts, and so far you're all collectively wrong so I'm not afraid of them being restored in the first place.
sguevar ago
Fair enough.
I disagrre with your assessment on u/WhiteRonin but you and I reached an agreement that to my view can only help move past that and forward.
My concerns on vote transparency remain but if in the future is adopted I will accept it.
virge ago
WhiteRonin's behavior speaks for itself. Anyone on board with it is part of the problem.
sguevar ago
Well that is applying guilty by association, you know I don't do that. Any difference you have with u/WhiteRonin you will have to resolve them yourself with him.
Much as what we did. So it is up to you u/virge.
At this moment you know where I stand. Thanks for the ping again.
Enjoy your weekend.
virge ago
Fair enough.