I delete at least 2/3 of the things I set out to post. Half way through "Fuck it - who cares anyway?" or "this is just going to start an argument I don't want to be bothered having." usually happen.
I wrote a long response to some bullshit yahoo news article. Then I said fuck it - who cares anyway? I deleted everything and simply said something along the lines of "we all know who is in control of the insurance companies". Sometimes short and sweet is better than nothing.
i mabye do this like 5% of the time, usually my response is fucking idgaf this is voat you say what you want you should never be swayed by peoples opinions ever
Happens to me too. If I don't feel like it is a serious discussion where people are exchanging ides, then I feel like there's no need to even bother, they aren't going to really read what I say.
All of the computational theories of mind were pretty much abandoned by the 80s, because our mind doesn't compute. Programs are very defined things that require a formal logic. The human mind's manner of understanding actually incorporates anti-logic and nobody really understands it.
You're right. We're all in a programming running on a VM on a VH for "someone" running an experiential simulation. I too support Flat Earth something crap something something....... /s
I think that’s one of the things that makes this website so great. The majority of the people here don’t give a fuck and they understand her time is more valuable than trying to get Internet points or win a completely useless debate.
"their time" or "his time" is the right word usage, not "her time". What kind of sentence is this, huh? Another cucked soyboys pussy worshipping? Or feminist virtue signaling?
It’s voice to text you fucking Nager. I drive a lot so I don’t have time to fucking type shit out. Sorry about the typos you fucking faggot I hope that you’re able to sleep tonight. If you would like let me know your location so I can call the military and the emergency technicians to make sure that your pulse and sanity are OK. I certainly wouldn’t want you hurting yourself over an Internet comment. Also, you’re a Nager. Also, voice to text once again
However, that is the number one reason that the state of knowledge on this site has stopped evolving. People with something new to add begin to not care enough to comment.
SUre thing. It's not as though there are a bunch of regular users who ditch their accounts frequently.
This is a retarded measure to, what exactly?
Guilty. If I had the same account for too long, It would be too easy to identify me; if you could be bothered of course, but I've been here a couple of years Came for FPH, but there's much more interesting stuff here. And FPH is well, retarded, quite a lot of the time. Look, a fat person murdered someone, all fat people are murderers.
I agree in the sense that I read/judge posts individually, but whenever I check the account behind it, it's usually because it's bad (trolling, shilling, ignorant or plain stupid) - and the account is nearly always less than a month old.
You are aware that due to the massive amount of propaganda that you have been subjected to, any visceral reaction to "trolling, shilling, ignorant or plain stupid" should be subject to great introspection, yes?
For example. Prove to me either the motion of the Earth, or evidence that two masses attract each other.
Am I a shill? A moron? FOr questioning the information I have been supplied by a group of know commie satanists?
If the earth doesn't move, how come the sun "falls" in the sky in fall?
If the attraction of mass is not present, and thus there is no inertia, how come a medicine ball and a basket ball of the same size will fall at the same speed?
I like to greet the alphabets every so often. After 34 years on this Earth I'm sure I'm on their lists and some poor FBI newbie has to scroll through all my posts. Hello, FBI!
That's why I always say don't engage, just downvoat and ignore.
Works for real life too, most of the time it's not worth your time to get pulled into a debate with some indoctrinated person that is yelling to the void that Whiteness is bad. Ignoring them and not giving them a platform is most of the time most effective.
I suppose the socratic method would work, getting people to ask questions themselves. From an ego perspective they're satisfied, because they aren't in a position of inferiority when you confront them. But I find it hard to actually kick start that process to get people to start questioning things.
To be very clear, this is not a technique for redpilling or when redpilling is possible. This is only to be used when the person you are engaging has absolutely no chance of being swayed no matter how persuasive your argument or how irrefutable your facts. This includes the audience as well.
It's more about knowing which battles are winnable, and which are an endless resource sink. My main point is to know when to engage, and when not to. Often times the only winning move is not to engage.
There are so many information and disinformation out there, if someone did not separate the wheat from the chaff already don't waste your time and energy. The time of redpills are over. If people still haven't recognized the bullshit that's all around us then it's a lost cause.
Kinda agree for the most part. We have outright White genocide and very popular people openly calling for the destruction of Whiteness.
There will always be youngins who need redpilling, but most of the older people have already chosen their side. I'll keep slingin' the pills in hopes of hitting that 1% who actually haven't chosen a side yet, but mostly I've pivoted to different strategies like focusing on improving my position and the positions of my allies.
As far as choosing sides, the goal of the sumbitches is to have each other hating one another to jump in with totalitarianism.
This one is tricky. You can’t be the only group that doesn’t fight. but if we all fight we all lose big. The reason they are coming hard at whites is if they can get them to bite, it’s on and they win. So all groups are set against whitey.
The head of the snake has been named. No other part counts.
view the rest of the comments →
lorlipone ago
I delete at least 2/3 of the things I set out to post. Half way through "Fuck it - who cares anyway?" or "this is just going to start an argument I don't want to be bothered having." usually happen.
chirogonemd ago
I'm always writing long winded responses that I know nobody will read, haha. I should probably say "fuck it" more often.
majb ago
I wrote a long response to some bullshit yahoo news article. Then I said fuck it - who cares anyway? I deleted everything and simply said something along the lines of "we all know who is in control of the insurance companies". Sometimes short and sweet is better than nothing.
T1tus ago
Dony have the arguement then....have to master the post and drop
LongyyBearr ago
Lol my fucking life XD
prairie ago
When I notice myself doing that, I realize it's a problem with the other person and with me for even engaging with someone like that.
IAmMightGuy ago
i mabye do this like 5% of the time, usually my response is fucking idgaf this is voat you say what you want you should never be swayed by peoples opinions ever
ExpertShitposter ago
yeh, i know that. its one of those, i'm gonna take a shit and come back to 25 replies. not today thanks.
cursedcrusader ago
This is me.
mentalbear ago
This reminds me - it may be time to go start a flame war against the faggots swarming in /science
lorlipone ago
Tell them there's no proof we landed on the moon.
capcapcap ago
Happens to me too. If I don't feel like it is a serious discussion where people are exchanging ides, then I feel like there's no need to even bother, they aren't going to really read what I say.
goforkyourself ago
Same.
Either I come on way too strong, I know that the idiots here believe in their echo-chamber or I just go "fuck it, I don't care anymore".
TXRepublicMovement ago
People are just meat robots running programs.
chirogonemd ago
I'd disagree with this completely.
All of the computational theories of mind were pretty much abandoned by the 80s, because our mind doesn't compute. Programs are very defined things that require a formal logic. The human mind's manner of understanding actually incorporates anti-logic and nobody really understands it.
TXRepublicMovement ago
I can tell you with 90% accuracy what normie NPCs believe and are entertained by, just by looking at them and hearing their accent and wording
goforkyourself ago
You're right. We're all in a programming running on a VM on a VH for "someone" running an experiential simulation. I too support Flat Earth something crap something something....... /s
(VM = Virtual Machine) (VH = Virtual Host)
bourbonexpert ago
I think that’s one of the things that makes this website so great. The majority of the people here don’t give a fuck and they understand her time is more valuable than trying to get Internet points or win a completely useless debate.
space_case ago
Short and to the point? Why yes.
rabiribi ago
"their time" or "his time" is the right word usage, not "her time". What kind of sentence is this, huh? Another cucked soyboys pussy worshipping? Or feminist virtue signaling?
bourbonexpert ago
It’s voice to text you fucking Nager. I drive a lot so I don’t have time to fucking type shit out. Sorry about the typos you fucking faggot I hope that you’re able to sleep tonight. If you would like let me know your location so I can call the military and the emergency technicians to make sure that your pulse and sanity are OK. I certainly wouldn’t want you hurting yourself over an Internet comment. Also, you’re a Nager. Also, voice to text once again
alele-opathic ago
However, that is the number one reason that the state of knowledge on this site has stopped evolving. People with something new to add begin to not care enough to comment.
antiliberalsociety ago
Account age and SCP/CCP levels help me to decide if it's worth it
Tistime ago
Meh, start a new account every couple of months.
BushChuck ago
What do you make of me?
Do I have the right stuff to have my opinion counted?
fartyshorts ago
No. 19 days is nothing, chief.
BushChuck ago
SUre thing. It's not as though there are a bunch of regular users who ditch their accounts frequently.
This is a retarded measure to, what exactly?
I don't give a fuck about internet points. Comments and posts rest on their merits, or you're just promoting your echo chamber.
My last account had something like 60k ccp, and that didn't make my opinions more or less valid.
Tistime ago
Guilty. If I had the same account for too long, It would be too easy to identify me; if you could be bothered of course, but I've been here a couple of years Came for FPH, but there's much more interesting stuff here. And FPH is well, retarded, quite a lot of the time. Look, a fat person murdered someone, all fat people are murderers.
BushChuck ago
/fph is a bunch of self hating fats that spend all day watching fat people on the talmudvison.
fartyshorts ago
I agree in the sense that I read/judge posts individually, but whenever I check the account behind it, it's usually because it's bad (trolling, shilling, ignorant or plain stupid) - and the account is nearly always less than a month old.
BushChuck ago
You are aware that due to the massive amount of propaganda that you have been subjected to, any visceral reaction to "trolling, shilling, ignorant or plain stupid" should be subject to great introspection, yes?
For example. Prove to me either the motion of the Earth, or evidence that two masses attract each other.
Am I a shill? A moron? FOr questioning the information I have been supplied by a group of know commie satanists?
fartyshorts ago
If the earth doesn't move, how come the sun "falls" in the sky in fall?
If the attraction of mass is not present, and thus there is no inertia, how come a medicine ball and a basket ball of the same size will fall at the same speed?
BushChuck ago
Why is a raven like a writing desk?
Malayar ago
I'll bite. why?
Neskuaxa ago
This is from the writer of "Alice in Wonderland" Lewis Carroll
"Because it can produce a few notes, though they are very flat; and it is never put with the wrong end in front!"
FullSemiAutomatic ago
That and quality of prior contributions.
armday2day ago
I'm on board with this approach, though I make it a point not to beat someone over the head with the fact if they're very new.
tanukihat ago
I feel a deep connection to this.
NPCGator ago
As do I, I'd say it's about 1/2 for me.
Xantha ago
fight me.
watitdew ago
No you don't.
HndrxMn ago
This is just contradiction. It's not an argument!
watitdew ago
Yes it is, faggot.
HndrxMn ago
Look, I paid for an argument nigger.
watitdew ago
No you didn't and I don't owe you anything you fucking beta
HndrxMn ago
God damn this conversation
watitdew ago
god damn that was funny i've certain i've seen it ages ago. too bad white people can't do comedy anymore.
Ihateyuppies ago
I do this all the time and knowing that one of the alphabet agencies have this account linked to me makes me do the same.
tanukihat ago
I like to greet the alphabets every so often. After 34 years on this Earth I'm sure I'm on their lists and some poor FBI newbie has to scroll through all my posts. Hello, FBI!
gonight ago
Made that mistake yesterday. Expect all kinds of bullshit if you call out a shill or retard in this day and age. Like killing a wasp near its nest.
CameraCode0 ago
That's why I always say don't engage, just downvoat and ignore.
Works for real life too, most of the time it's not worth your time to get pulled into a debate with some indoctrinated person that is yelling to the void that Whiteness is bad. Ignoring them and not giving them a platform is most of the time most effective.
Neskuaxa ago
How else does one go about red pilling?
I suppose the socratic method would work, getting people to ask questions themselves. From an ego perspective they're satisfied, because they aren't in a position of inferiority when you confront them. But I find it hard to actually kick start that process to get people to start questioning things.
CameraCode0 ago
To be very clear, this is not a technique for redpilling or when redpilling is possible. This is only to be used when the person you are engaging has absolutely no chance of being swayed no matter how persuasive your argument or how irrefutable your facts. This includes the audience as well.
It's more about knowing which battles are winnable, and which are an endless resource sink. My main point is to know when to engage, and when not to. Often times the only winning move is not to engage.
Neskuaxa ago
In other words, don't cast your pearls before swine. I've come to accept this for about 90% of the people I meet sadly.
Zizi ago
There are so many information and disinformation out there, if someone did not separate the wheat from the chaff already don't waste your time and energy. The time of redpills are over. If people still haven't recognized the bullshit that's all around us then it's a lost cause.
CameraCode0 ago
Kinda agree for the most part. We have outright White genocide and very popular people openly calling for the destruction of Whiteness.
There will always be youngins who need redpilling, but most of the older people have already chosen their side. I'll keep slingin' the pills in hopes of hitting that 1% who actually haven't chosen a side yet, but mostly I've pivoted to different strategies like focusing on improving my position and the positions of my allies.
CaucasianSlavery ago
As far as choosing sides, the goal of the sumbitches is to have each other hating one another to jump in with totalitarianism.
This one is tricky. You can’t be the only group that doesn’t fight. but if we all fight we all lose big. The reason they are coming hard at whites is if they can get them to bite, it’s on and they win. So all groups are set against whitey.
The head of the snake has been named. No other part counts.