From a practical and immediate stand point, yes that would work.
What bothers me is what is says about the site. This simple function keeps a verse community together instead of forcing it split, often into a less obvious name, making them harder to find. Is this just bad management or something more? It's something that could easily be delegated, so why hasn't it been? To me it is a telltale of a dying site, when basic functions are being ignored.
My other comment in this thread was that I would support a fork only because subverse requests are being ignored. I thought that is what you were replying to.
Nah, I wasn’t replying to that but it’s another example of is going on in general. Management is crying about the lack of growth but misses the simple points they should be looking at. Oh well.
view the rest of the comments →
Titus-of-Voat ago
What do you mean by fork?
WhiteRonin ago
In this case. Create a new community.
Titus-of-Voat ago
From a practical and immediate stand point, yes that would work.
What bothers me is what is says about the site. This simple function keeps a verse community together instead of forcing it split, often into a less obvious name, making them harder to find. Is this just bad management or something more? It's something that could easily be delegated, so why hasn't it been? To me it is a telltale of a dying site, when basic functions are being ignored.
WhiteRonin ago
Didn’t see comment.
Sorry punctuation was off.
Titus-of-Voat ago
My other comment in this thread was that I would support a fork only because subverse requests are being ignored. I thought that is what you were replying to.
I decided to go rant about it here.
WhiteRonin ago
Nah, I wasn’t replying to that but it’s another example of is going on in general. Management is crying about the lack of growth but misses the simple points they should be looking at. Oh well.