QTDDTOT: Questions that don’t deserve their own thread
This is the thread for one-liner questions about /pol/-related topics. “What does /pol/ think of [x],” “is [x] redpilled,” and associated questions belong here. Threads created based on a single, simple question will be deleted. If your thread is deleted, come here and ask again. REMINDER TO SEARCH THE CATALOG FIRST.
OP - https://8ch.net/pol/res/12021208.html
view the rest of the comments →
16421904? ago
Question; Is it possible to win over the people, and create a nation without/need of money? Not a free for all society, but a patriarchal hierarchy, only no money involved. Instead, the common bond of man, and the ideal for striving for greater glory?
'Gold' being the fruits of our labor and resources that (perhaps) people can be self-sufficient machines, so they will not constantly beg for handouts
Any anons ever think about it? I'd like to hear your thoughts. Imagine Rome, but instead chasing the dominance of one self mentally and physically, being your own man. With a leader that acts more like a guide than strictly "do this, do that", if you see where I am coming from
Especially with the eternal parasite we call the kike, always entering into society by money, and the fact we also all share the common 'fear'/'bond' of the world acting openly against (European) whites across the globe
16430095? ago
Anon, you're misunderstanding what money is. A society must produce goods to function. It must also exchange materials and finished goods in order to function. The only difference between money and bartering is that money is more efficient. Money represents credits. You earn credits by performing a service, or creating a good. If you take money out of the equation, it just doesn't work right. If you make wheelbarrows, you can't carry 2 wheelbarrows to the restaurant to pay for dinner. Bartering is only useful when there is no established currency… You cannot base a complex economy on bartering.
16430097? ago
I understand. Something which I am familiar with, you are right.
What I was hoping for, is each man to have his own 'land', grow his own food, etc.. be encouraged to improve and build constantly. You know?
What always worries me is the 'infiltration' used by the jew using money in particular, we can see this throughout history. Although, I admit, that the same can be said for resources, though we both know a hard working jew does not exist.
I bring that concept up because since we are so interconnected now via internet, global market, transport, etc.. this may very well be the only chance in history to finally get rid of the eternal parasite once and for all, if we were to play our cards right.
The idea of a self-maintaining populous may be too crazy of an idea in modern times, but discussion on theories could help us contemplate on how to stop them from returning to power. Albeit be 1000 years from now.
16453504? ago
You could try repeating the Worgl Experiment with local currencies with a demurrage charge at the end of the month to discourage hoarding. No jew is willing to spend real money to hoard money. Demurrage makes people spend as soon as they get it an since its only local currency it stays local. Worgl had immaculately maintained streets in the midst of the great depression, and well built everything. Then the kikes shut it down.
Google "Worgl experiment"
16456844? ago
I have read a handful of articles, and examples now. In one it read that Michigan had a lead water problem, but it was not fixable until they finally implemented community money to restore the well-being of the populous.
Damn, the Fed Reserve were willing to let them all drink polluted water, in order to maintain a hold on usury. Disgusting.
Also read Sardinia's example using Sedex, but with a slight difference, and how they pretty much turned the whole island around + helped circulate 51 million Euros into Europe by themselves. Incredible.
What has me wondering a little bit here is; Is this part of the whole Chemtrail thing? I mean, with Monsato, etc.. the degradation of crops for actual farmers/growers. I swear I read a while ago that farmers could not even grow vegetables properly because the soil was pretty much rotten from all the things they pump the skies with over them.
Not saying Chemtrails was specifically for that. However, I can imagine that it take the local market right out of the picture and incentivizes people to buy from nearby supermarkets instead only.
I can't tell you how much I appreciate you bringing up the "Worgl experiment" to my attention, and hopefully a few anons here. They has helped TREMENDOUSLY, in what I am searching of.
I do have to ask though, is this sort of thing taught in Economics classes? or is it stripped off the curriculum altogether, making way for kike economics only? Or even by briefly mentioning it in a class by the teacher, only to in the end be mentioned, "but in the end, it didn't work, obviously. Since we'd not be using our current money system now otherwise, right, goy?"
Again, deeply appreciative of bringing that system up.