You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

16421904? ago

Question; Is it possible to win over the people, and create a nation without/need of money? Not a free for all society, but a patriarchal hierarchy, only no money involved. Instead, the common bond of man, and the ideal for striving for greater glory?

'Gold' being the fruits of our labor and resources that (perhaps) people can be self-sufficient machines, so they will not constantly beg for handouts

Any anons ever think about it? I'd like to hear your thoughts. Imagine Rome, but instead chasing the dominance of one self mentally and physically, being your own man. With a leader that acts more like a guide than strictly "do this, do that", if you see where I am coming from

Especially with the eternal parasite we call the kike, always entering into society by money, and the fact we also all share the common 'fear'/'bond' of the world acting openly against (European) whites across the globe

16519492? ago

fucking commie bastard

16430095? ago

Anon, you're misunderstanding what money is. A society must produce goods to function. It must also exchange materials and finished goods in order to function. The only difference between money and bartering is that money is more efficient. Money represents credits. You earn credits by performing a service, or creating a good. If you take money out of the equation, it just doesn't work right. If you make wheelbarrows, you can't carry 2 wheelbarrows to the restaurant to pay for dinner. Bartering is only useful when there is no established currency… You cannot base a complex economy on bartering.

16430097? ago

I understand. Something which I am familiar with, you are right.

What I was hoping for, is each man to have his own 'land', grow his own food, etc.. be encouraged to improve and build constantly. You know?

What always worries me is the 'infiltration' used by the jew using money in particular, we can see this throughout history. Although, I admit, that the same can be said for resources, though we both know a hard working jew does not exist.

I bring that concept up because since we are so interconnected now via internet, global market, transport, etc.. this may very well be the only chance in history to finally get rid of the eternal parasite once and for all, if we were to play our cards right.

The idea of a self-maintaining populous may be too crazy of an idea in modern times, but discussion on theories could help us contemplate on how to stop them from returning to power. Albeit be 1000 years from now.

16453504? ago

You could try repeating the Worgl Experiment with local currencies with a demurrage charge at the end of the month to discourage hoarding. No jew is willing to spend real money to hoard money. Demurrage makes people spend as soon as they get it an since its only local currency it stays local. Worgl had immaculately maintained streets in the midst of the great depression, and well built everything. Then the kikes shut it down.

Google "Worgl experiment"

16456844? ago

I have read a handful of articles, and examples now. In one it read that Michigan had a lead water problem, but it was not fixable until they finally implemented community money to restore the well-being of the populous.

Damn, the Fed Reserve were willing to let them all drink polluted water, in order to maintain a hold on usury. Disgusting.

Also read Sardinia's example using Sedex, but with a slight difference, and how they pretty much turned the whole island around + helped circulate 51 million Euros into Europe by themselves. Incredible.

What has me wondering a little bit here is; Is this part of the whole Chemtrail thing? I mean, with Monsato, etc.. the degradation of crops for actual farmers/growers. I swear I read a while ago that farmers could not even grow vegetables properly because the soil was pretty much rotten from all the things they pump the skies with over them.

Not saying Chemtrails was specifically for that. However, I can imagine that it take the local market right out of the picture and incentivizes people to buy from nearby supermarkets instead only.

I can't tell you how much I appreciate you bringing up the "Worgl experiment" to my attention, and hopefully a few anons here. They has helped TREMENDOUSLY, in what I am searching of.

I do have to ask though, is this sort of thing taught in Economics classes? or is it stripped off the curriculum altogether, making way for kike economics only? Or even by briefly mentioning it in a class by the teacher, only to in the end be mentioned, "but in the end, it didn't work, obviously. Since we'd not be using our current money system now otherwise, right, goy?"

Again, deeply appreciative of bringing that system up.

16421906? ago

Yeah its called an oath in the hierarchy, of course it can't be for all time or for everything but it is a useful stop-gap to prevent treachery on the most important thing, which is winning. Hitler had his people swear loyalty in the similar way Tacitus wrote in Germania of how the Germanics swore loyalty to a King, "The chief fights for victory, his vassals fight for their chief", victory for the people is the objective through their King. And the Germanics fought until they accepted the death of their King as it follows from the Red-Boat poem.

16422576? ago

I appreciate the reply.

I will look more into that right now.

How I wish we could get ourselves past money of any form, and all of us have a brotherhood so strong that we won't even need such a thing in life. Only our hands, and the will to throw ourselves onto the task

Can you Imagine a European 'Empire' with everyone's culture still intact, but working as once giant machine? Countries turning into regions, more than outright separations

16423016? ago

It can't get you past wealth entirely, since your warriors have families of their own to keep but the oath to the King does work for keeping Europeans truthful, without a King everything becomes degraded and the nation falls apart.

have a brotherhood so strong that we won't even need such a thing

You can't have that for your entire society but around the King there always forms a kind of family in strict oath to their King. Look at any true European King, in any age, and you will find these important people dedicating their lives for the King to survive beyond wages and thus the nation and land. I think this is what you mean.

Only our hands, and the will to throw ourselves onto the task

In this time of "temporary peace" before the grandiose wars of the future we must dedicate ourselves to figuring out who we truly are, for those who will not have as much time in future as they will be fighting for the folk.

I know we will lose lands before this storm is overcame, rough seas ahead, but we cannot sink. As our forefathers set our course, so we owe them a debt but they did what they had to in order to survive and so must we.