Genes determine how your brain is literally formed, you would have to be some sort of dualist which not even the most extreme christcucks these days believe and also have 0 evidence for. Intelligence comes from the physical makeup of the brain and is therefore genetic. Quantitative genetics like twin studies show IQ to be about 80% of the variance caused by genes, and that’s just average over life, in adulthood it’s probably about 90% since in childhood it can be as little as 50%. It’s not even an argument anymore, they are just denying reality. Brian volume correlates with IQ at around .4 as shown with MRI scans which is what anyone would expect. Guess which races have the smallest brains (not to mention more archaic shape) and which have the biggest? Niggers have small archaic skull shapes and Whites and East Asians have the more modern and bigger brains, who woulda thunk? Admixture studies show IQ to be genetic with western whites at around 101 and niggers (with 20% white admixture) at 86 and mulattos with 93. Exactly linear. GWAS studies show the genes that make up the brain and end up correlating with intelligence are much more likely to be found in whites and East Asians, shocker. To deny this is to deny science, the only way to skirt this is to deny that IQ is relevant but it is because it makes predictions. The other way is to deny race which is solipsistic kike deconstruction, a 3 year old knows race is real.
Weight is not determined by genes because your body is a closed system. Your metabolism can be determined by genetics or environment (lazy fat fucks have lower) but at the end of the day the laws of thermodynamics cannot be broken. You put less energy into your body than you burn and you lose weight, it’s that fucking simple.
Genetics determines the efficiency at which your body converts excess energy into fat as well as the amount of energy stored per fat cell. Genetics plays a huge role in weight gain and weight loss. As for IQ, it is also genetic but can be increased through learning. IQ is determined based on pattern recognition(not a metric of actual intelligence, just correlated so) which, like any other neural synapse in the brain, can be trained and enhanced.
Reading does not drastically change your IQ. The only real way to change your iq is to partially destroy the brain. Maybe in childhood before full gene expression when environment is only like half of the variance it might matter. For instance those niggers raised in upper class families in adoption studies had IQs of around 93 (they also mature faster just like girls, tests on all but adults is pretty weird and in accurate due to the rate of maturation). Guess what happened as adults though? Right back to 85-86. And yes IQ is the best proxy for g in existence and make predictions powerfully and is therefore valid no matter how much you kick and scream and say “we don’t really have a way to measure it!” Maybe next time bud.
You should consider fully reading my post before replying. IQ is a measure of pattern recognition. Pattern recognition, like most instinctual processes in the brain, can be strengthened. Genetics determines your starting point, some people are born with more neurons attributed to pattern recognition and that has to do with geography and evolution. You can, however, strengthen those connections which raises IQ significantly. Conversely, those connections can also weaken with disuse/time. Secondly, IQ correlates with intelligence but it is not and should not be used as the predominant measure of intelligence. Intelligence, as anything else, is relative to your point of comparison. Someone might be a mathematical genius yet fail to understand physics. To a physicist, they are dumb. To a mathematician, they are an unbridled genius.
No, genetics determine your max point. You cannot increase your IQ beyond the capacity of what your brain is able to process. And on your second point you are talking about knowledge, not intelligence. Get over it, intelligence is about as deterministic as height. You literally cannot just read books and increase g as measured by IQ. It is an inherent trait of the physical brain. Somebody who knows jack shit about IQ trying to lecture me, cute.
You clearly don't understand the neuroplasticity of the brain, even in adulthood. You can't change your height because it's determined by your spinal column(bone). You can increase the size and strength of muscles, however, such as the brain. An increase in muscle size or strength is not genetic, it is not passed on through reproduction. It is, nevertheless, possible and plausible. Moreover, I was precisely speaking of intelligence and not knowledge.
Weight is not determined by genes because your body is a closed system. Your metabolism can be determined by genetics or environment (lazy fat fucks have lower) but at the end of the day the laws of thermodynamics cannot be broken. You put less energy into your body than you burn and you lose weight, it’s that fucking simple.
This is a myth. Fat lazy fucks have a higher metabolism because of their body mass. Metabolism is correlated with mass, be it fat or muscles. Fat people saying they got low metabolism are just making yet another excuse for their fucked up choices.
East Asians and Whites fucking each other gave us Slavs, you can't deny the literary genius that has come from Russia, Dostoyevsky Solzhenitsyn, Gurdjiefff, the ingenuity of Russian engineering. The extractor bolt of the AK is a piece of genius.
I don't believe bigger is better when it comes to brains, but generally, the smarter people (Asians and Europeans) have both bigger brains and better brains.
That’s cool but it does when it comes to hominids. The literature doesn’t care what you think, it’s there and it does matter. You’re probably thinking “why aren’t elephants smart then hurrrrr.” They aren’t hominids.
I'm only thinking about people. You can have a smart nig nog with a small brain and a dumb ass white guy with a big brain. Brain quality and brain size are two different things. They are somewhat strongly correlated, because as I said, the people with the bigger brains also have the better brains (population averages here).
That’s called variation. Brain size does correlate with IQ. Niggers also have more archaic brains. I’m talking about averages which are rules when talking about populations. Thanks for the 10th grade lesson on outliers.
Thanks professor. Over millions of iterations I’ll take my chances that high iq is a function of the brain and the rule is that the bigger the brain the smarter the race. God damn is this reddit?
A professor of biological psychology told us a story of a surgeon who had an autopsy done on him. When they cut him open, they found he had half a brain. This guy with half a brain went through medical school and worked as a surgeon. Brain quality and brain size are not the same thing. The people who tend to have bigger brains also tend to be the people with better brains.
You don't understand, so you resort to name calling. Immature and dumb.
I am not dismissing the correlation of brain size and brain quality. I am saying the two things are separate. You can have big brains that function poorly and small brains that function well.
His brain is big; therefore, he is smart. This is not absolutely true.
His brain is small; therefore, he is dumb. This is not absolutely true.
Niggers are dumb and niggers have small brains. Chinks are smart, and chinks have big brains. These are population generalizations.
Was just into this with some lefties. Just impossible to operate on a level of logic with them. Like arguing with my mentally ill ex, or most women in general - when pinned to something they can't bullshit their way out of change the subject or nit pick some minor detail in an example of something. Their final argument was that they're a scientist (not in this field) so they must be right because I'm not a scientist. Then 10 rounds on whether social attitudes and human involvement in 'muh scientific process' could influence what science says, particularly in fields that could be more open to interpretation, not that that even sounds like the issue according to you rather than suppression and willful ignorance of the facts. Ah well. No fanatic ever thought they were a fanatic. Me - a fanatic.
The only response to leftist logic is to either say "You're a fucking idiot" and ignore them, or to outright ridicule their beliefs to the point where they shut the fuck up and continue shutting the fuck up because they're afraid of being ridiculed again. Fortunately, the left are mentally ill and suffer from "muh anxiety" and "muh depression" (read: they are snowflakes that are incapable of dealing with normal adult events in life), so they tend to shut down mentally.
ridiculing and calling them liars is the best approach IMO. Especially when they resort to name-calling: "You can call me a racist all you want, but you can't call me a liar, you liar".
It's a funny thought. Being called a liar has been the worst accusation besides 'thief' throughout times. You'd think they would call people like us 'liars' all the time, but they don't. They had to make up word like 'racist', 'xenophobe' 'islamophobe' and 'sexist' and then make people believe these word have power. They had to invent words and concepts because they can't call us liars.
They invent words and concepts for everything including their original argument, because they work entirely on a subjective premise - that if anyone disagrees they are free to then just change the goalposts so they win again. It's the logic that a toddler uses to "win" an argument.
Why do I find sanity on this site? Man, you got it so right. The left ideology and tactics for negotiation and persuasion are basically female psychology.
Ever argue with a woman that escelated into something physical?
They are retards who don’t do science. Science is a process. If you can’t even read the literature and become a race realist you aren’t cut out for using the method.
|Based on observation I wouldn’t even hypothesize equality between races.
Jews and women hate it when you take one of their axioms and either 'reverse the explanandum' (make them prove muh equality) or simply reframe/contextualize it (Islam is right about gays) because that's the tactic they use to control the west and you're just straightening things out for them.
People aren't even equal to themselves at different points of their life. I've never had a discussion with someone about 'equality' who understood the concept of controls
And that’s not to mention between groups which is impossible. That’s why their only “argument” at the end of the day is to deny race is real or to deny that intelligence can be measured. These of course are philosophical arguments brought to a debate about the natural world and measurement. That sounds like religion and not a method.
Posted automatically (#142627) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here. (@Nukeisrael: Click here to suppress your anonymous crosslink notifications)
view the rest of the comments →
Nukeisrael ago
Genes determine how your brain is literally formed, you would have to be some sort of dualist which not even the most extreme christcucks these days believe and also have 0 evidence for. Intelligence comes from the physical makeup of the brain and is therefore genetic. Quantitative genetics like twin studies show IQ to be about 80% of the variance caused by genes, and that’s just average over life, in adulthood it’s probably about 90% since in childhood it can be as little as 50%. It’s not even an argument anymore, they are just denying reality. Brian volume correlates with IQ at around .4 as shown with MRI scans which is what anyone would expect. Guess which races have the smallest brains (not to mention more archaic shape) and which have the biggest? Niggers have small archaic skull shapes and Whites and East Asians have the more modern and bigger brains, who woulda thunk? Admixture studies show IQ to be genetic with western whites at around 101 and niggers (with 20% white admixture) at 86 and mulattos with 93. Exactly linear. GWAS studies show the genes that make up the brain and end up correlating with intelligence are much more likely to be found in whites and East Asians, shocker. To deny this is to deny science, the only way to skirt this is to deny that IQ is relevant but it is because it makes predictions. The other way is to deny race which is solipsistic kike deconstruction, a 3 year old knows race is real.
Weight is not determined by genes because your body is a closed system. Your metabolism can be determined by genetics or environment (lazy fat fucks have lower) but at the end of the day the laws of thermodynamics cannot be broken. You put less energy into your body than you burn and you lose weight, it’s that fucking simple.
Kikes and reddit can get fucked.
Varlet ago
Genetics determines the efficiency at which your body converts excess energy into fat as well as the amount of energy stored per fat cell. Genetics plays a huge role in weight gain and weight loss. As for IQ, it is also genetic but can be increased through learning. IQ is determined based on pattern recognition(not a metric of actual intelligence, just correlated so) which, like any other neural synapse in the brain, can be trained and enhanced.
Nukeisrael ago
Reading does not drastically change your IQ. The only real way to change your iq is to partially destroy the brain. Maybe in childhood before full gene expression when environment is only like half of the variance it might matter. For instance those niggers raised in upper class families in adoption studies had IQs of around 93 (they also mature faster just like girls, tests on all but adults is pretty weird and in accurate due to the rate of maturation). Guess what happened as adults though? Right back to 85-86. And yes IQ is the best proxy for g in existence and make predictions powerfully and is therefore valid no matter how much you kick and scream and say “we don’t really have a way to measure it!” Maybe next time bud.
Varlet ago
You should consider fully reading my post before replying. IQ is a measure of pattern recognition. Pattern recognition, like most instinctual processes in the brain, can be strengthened. Genetics determines your starting point, some people are born with more neurons attributed to pattern recognition and that has to do with geography and evolution. You can, however, strengthen those connections which raises IQ significantly. Conversely, those connections can also weaken with disuse/time. Secondly, IQ correlates with intelligence but it is not and should not be used as the predominant measure of intelligence. Intelligence, as anything else, is relative to your point of comparison. Someone might be a mathematical genius yet fail to understand physics. To a physicist, they are dumb. To a mathematician, they are an unbridled genius.
Nukeisrael ago
No, genetics determine your max point. You cannot increase your IQ beyond the capacity of what your brain is able to process. And on your second point you are talking about knowledge, not intelligence. Get over it, intelligence is about as deterministic as height. You literally cannot just read books and increase g as measured by IQ. It is an inherent trait of the physical brain. Somebody who knows jack shit about IQ trying to lecture me, cute.
Varlet ago
You clearly don't understand the neuroplasticity of the brain, even in adulthood. You can't change your height because it's determined by your spinal column(bone). You can increase the size and strength of muscles, however, such as the brain. An increase in muscle size or strength is not genetic, it is not passed on through reproduction. It is, nevertheless, possible and plausible. Moreover, I was precisely speaking of intelligence and not knowledge.
olinneserpona ago
This is a myth. Fat lazy fucks have a higher metabolism because of their body mass. Metabolism is correlated with mass, be it fat or muscles. Fat people saying they got low metabolism are just making yet another excuse for their fucked up choices.
crankyspanky ago
Excellent post.
slowcrash101 ago
East Asians and Whites fucking each other gave us Slavs, you can't deny the literary genius that has come from Russia, Dostoyevsky Solzhenitsyn, Gurdjiefff, the ingenuity of Russian engineering. The extractor bolt of the AK is a piece of genius.
TheLesserApes ago
So true I remember categorizing people into 2 groups when I was very young. Niggers and everyone else.
crankyspanky ago
Heh. All kids do that. All kids know to beware the nigger.
qiddlemaddle ago
Drugs can change anything in your body, including the size of you brain and your maximum IQ.
Nukeisrael ago
They might make you better at solving something like a RPM but they don’t make your brain bigger. Lay off the drugs.
DontBeRacist ago
I don't believe bigger is better when it comes to brains, but generally, the smarter people (Asians and Europeans) have both bigger brains and better brains.
Nukeisrael ago
That’s cool but it does when it comes to hominids. The literature doesn’t care what you think, it’s there and it does matter. You’re probably thinking “why aren’t elephants smart then hurrrrr.” They aren’t hominids.
DontBeRacist ago
I'm only thinking about people. You can have a smart nig nog with a small brain and a dumb ass white guy with a big brain. Brain quality and brain size are two different things. They are somewhat strongly correlated, because as I said, the people with the bigger brains also have the better brains (population averages here).
Nukeisrael ago
That’s called variation. Brain size does correlate with IQ. Niggers also have more archaic brains. I’m talking about averages which are rules when talking about populations. Thanks for the 10th grade lesson on outliers.
DontBeRacist ago
Correlation does not imply causation. You can have a big brain that works poorly and a small one that works well.
Nukeisrael ago
Thanks professor. Over millions of iterations I’ll take my chances that high iq is a function of the brain and the rule is that the bigger the brain the smarter the race. God damn is this reddit?
DontBeRacist ago
Lighter skin is also correlated with higher IQ. Light skin and well-functioning brains are two separate things.
Lighter skin is also correlated with bigger brains. Light skin and bigger brains are two separate things.
Nukeisrael ago
Yeah it’s a package deal. Something at the end of the day is causing it and it’s genes you faggot.
DontBeRacist ago
A professor of biological psychology told us a story of a surgeon who had an autopsy done on him. When they cut him open, they found he had half a brain. This guy with half a brain went through medical school and worked as a surgeon. Brain quality and brain size are not the same thing. The people who tend to have bigger brains also tend to be the people with better brains.
Nukeisrael ago
Cool anecdote. I’m talking millions of people. You’re a midwit at best.
DontBeRacist ago
You don't understand, so you resort to name calling. Immature and dumb.
I am not dismissing the correlation of brain size and brain quality. I am saying the two things are separate. You can have big brains that function poorly and small brains that function well.
His brain is big; therefore, he is smart. This is not absolutely true.
His brain is small; therefore, he is dumb. This is not absolutely true.
Niggers are dumb and niggers have small brains. Chinks are smart, and chinks have big brains. These are population generalizations.
ilovejuices3 ago
based
Basically_Hitler ago
Was just into this with some lefties. Just impossible to operate on a level of logic with them. Like arguing with my mentally ill ex, or most women in general - when pinned to something they can't bullshit their way out of change the subject or nit pick some minor detail in an example of something. Their final argument was that they're a scientist (not in this field) so they must be right because I'm not a scientist. Then 10 rounds on whether social attitudes and human involvement in 'muh scientific process' could influence what science says, particularly in fields that could be more open to interpretation, not that that even sounds like the issue according to you rather than suppression and willful ignorance of the facts. Ah well. No fanatic ever thought they were a fanatic. Me - a fanatic.
Intrixina ago
The only response to leftist logic is to either say "You're a fucking idiot" and ignore them, or to outright ridicule their beliefs to the point where they shut the fuck up and continue shutting the fuck up because they're afraid of being ridiculed again. Fortunately, the left are mentally ill and suffer from "muh anxiety" and "muh depression" (read: they are snowflakes that are incapable of dealing with normal adult events in life), so they tend to shut down mentally.
olinneserpona ago
ridiculing and calling them liars is the best approach IMO. Especially when they resort to name-calling: "You can call me a racist all you want, but you can't call me a liar, you liar".
It's a funny thought. Being called a liar has been the worst accusation besides 'thief' throughout times. You'd think they would call people like us 'liars' all the time, but they don't. They had to make up word like 'racist', 'xenophobe' 'islamophobe' and 'sexist' and then make people believe these word have power. They had to invent words and concepts because they can't call us liars.
Intrixina ago
They invent words and concepts for everything including their original argument, because they work entirely on a subjective premise - that if anyone disagrees they are free to then just change the goalposts so they win again. It's the logic that a toddler uses to "win" an argument.
crankyspanky ago
Why do I find sanity on this site? Man, you got it so right. The left ideology and tactics for negotiation and persuasion are basically female psychology.
Ever argue with a woman that escelated into something physical?
This is the left.
Nukeisrael ago
They are retards who don’t do science. Science is a process. If you can’t even read the literature and become a race realist you aren’t cut out for using the method.
HighEnergyLife ago
|Based on observation I wouldn’t even hypothesize equality between races.
Jews and women hate it when you take one of their axioms and either 'reverse the explanandum' (make them prove muh equality) or simply reframe/contextualize it (Islam is right about gays) because that's the tactic they use to control the west and you're just straightening things out for them.
Nukeisrael ago
Equality wasn’t ever proven or even hypothesized. It was taken as fact just like the religious who takes his god being real as fact. It’s not science.
HighEnergyLife ago
People aren't even equal to themselves at different points of their life. I've never had a discussion with someone about 'equality' who understood the concept of controls
Nukeisrael ago
And that’s not to mention between groups which is impossible. That’s why their only “argument” at the end of the day is to deny race is real or to deny that intelligence can be measured. These of course are philosophical arguments brought to a debate about the natural world and measurement. That sounds like religion and not a method.
TheLesserApes ago
But i sucked the professors dick in anatomy for nurses that means im literally a scientist(TM)
SearchVoatBot ago
This comment was linked from this anonymous v/Hiddenlol comment.
Posted automatically (#142627) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here. (@Nukeisrael: Click here to suppress your anonymous crosslink notifications)