You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

wonderfuldonut ago

fools and sjw's are incapable of understanding reasoning and logic. They are all for science when it reflects their world view however science reason and facts are swiftly ignored when it proves their ideals false.

uab ago

Exactly right. Moral relativity

Killnigs3 ago

more like amoral capraciousness

uab ago

I had to look that up, and I can't agree that it's entirely random, what these people support. They may have an instinct for 'excitement,' and so would probably often be impulsive, but they also want to gather resources, status, titles, fame, various such things that you could expect a narcissist to want.

For example, that Nancy who admonishes people to not go the the hair-dresser's, but herself goes to the hair-dresser's, has no interest in principles, only in her own interest. Apparently she owns a billion USD or something. I do not think she would ever just give that away on a 'whim,' but absolutely think she's scheming all the time to try and increase her fortune in any way she can, completely disregarding both legality and morality that she may, earlier the same day, have tried to impose on others...

Killnigs3 ago

these people argue the merits of killing babies their morals and feelings are completely all over the place random and at the beck and call of their leaders they have no true values at all but anger and rage and a sense of righteousness

uab ago

Sure, a sense of self-righteousness and right to do whatever they perceive serves them. That is what I mean by 'moral relativity.' They think it's wrong to steal, if it's you stealing from them. But they, themselves, feel absolutely entitled to steal all day long, at least so long as they can get away with it...

There is no day of the weak, is my point, when they think others stealing from them is right, and them stealing from others is wrong, so whereas they do not follow any principles, they do follow self-interest. From the book Animal Farm, you know the expression, 'some are more equal than others.' Another term that applies is, 'double standard.' If there's a 'double standard,' then there is no standard..., it's just about what at any given time seems to serve them.

Killnigs3 ago

yes exactly amoral, as in without concern for morals ethics or values or principles of any kind. Capricious of or having a sudden and erratic nature, they can be stirred but only at the beck and call of their leaders.

uab ago

The first part I follow. The 'erratic' part I'm not sure I know entirely what you mean by. I do think they are very lost in life, depending on 'fashionable opinion of the week,' reading a lot of 'lifestyle magazines' and so on, definitely following leaders and idols. If we looked at percentages of atheism, I assume we would find higher numbers for these people, which I think exactly has to do with their feeling lost. Lacking this particular inner 'moral compass' is still not random. If you 'trigger' their particular sense of how thing should go to benefit them, they have demonstrated that they will commit violence and even murder, and you have the various other screaming-at-the-sky TDS. They don't just wake up one day, and put on a maga hat

Killnigs3 ago

The are like perpetual children incapable of processing thought. If they lack the will to have a functional belief system and worldview it is hard to say they are really people at all

uab ago

They are not people, according to some things I've read and heard, not in the sense you and I mean. As for worldview, I can't agree that it's based on will. The human being is not a 'blank slate' that can simply be 'programmed,' by ourselves or others, to hold any and all views.