It's not about 'Black Lives Matter.' Like their organizations usual have, it's a name that doesn't simply convey something about the organization but that is in itself a manipulative propaganda campaign. By putting up the words 'black lives matter,' they are trying to sneak under the rader the notion that anyone they oppose, said that black lives do not matter. Nobody said that. So they are doing a very simple strawman argument already in their name. With these people, everything has an 'angle,' is always about manipulation, trying to sneak some tactical progress.
What Shapiro says in his expression, is very good. He does have very many good points in his debates. The thing is not that he doesn't have any points but that he is a sort of trap, a honey-pot, a piper of Rotterdam, collecting up the 'rebels' and sending them on a long trip to the middle of nothing... This is the case with all 'civic nationalists' and the labelling of them as some sort of anti-globalists. They are not globalists, simply proponents of Corporations instead of proponents of The State.
Now, the post we are commenting to here, does have a point, because those who want to destroy Western civilization, and I don't mean Jews in key positions but the 'useful idiot' white Europeans, are based on women's views and values that are indeed about feelings, and that do not take into account what the practical results would be, if their feminine values were applied to society instead of to the family and little children. You also have r-selected men, typically non-masculine men, and generally black people who appear to be r-selected as a race.
He does add poison. I'm not saying Shapiro is someone to follow, I said that some of what he says are good points. It's like if your opponent wears pants, you don't therefore now become anti-pants-wearing.
view the rest of the comments →
mendelbot ago
Don't give me "your feelings don't matter" shapiro bs.
"Black Lives Matter" begs the question "To Whom?" It doesn't make it an irrelevant issue.
uab ago
It's not about 'Black Lives Matter.' Like their organizations usual have, it's a name that doesn't simply convey something about the organization but that is in itself a manipulative propaganda campaign. By putting up the words 'black lives matter,' they are trying to sneak under the rader the notion that anyone they oppose, said that black lives do not matter. Nobody said that. So they are doing a very simple strawman argument already in their name. With these people, everything has an 'angle,' is always about manipulation, trying to sneak some tactical progress.
What Shapiro says in his expression, is very good. He does have very many good points in his debates. The thing is not that he doesn't have any points but that he is a sort of trap, a honey-pot, a piper of Rotterdam, collecting up the 'rebels' and sending them on a long trip to the middle of nothing... This is the case with all 'civic nationalists' and the labelling of them as some sort of anti-globalists. They are not globalists, simply proponents of Corporations instead of proponents of The State.
Now, the post we are commenting to here, does have a point, because those who want to destroy Western civilization, and I don't mean Jews in key positions but the 'useful idiot' white Europeans, are based on women's views and values that are indeed about feelings, and that do not take into account what the practical results would be, if their feminine values were applied to society instead of to the family and little children. You also have r-selected men, typically non-masculine men, and generally black people who appear to be r-selected as a race.
mendelbot ago
"He does have very many good points in his debates."
It doesn't matter if he's adding poison into what he spoon feeds his audience.
uab ago
He does add poison. I'm not saying Shapiro is someone to follow, I said that some of what he says are good points. It's like if your opponent wears pants, you don't therefore now become anti-pants-wearing.
mendelbot ago
uab, You do have a point. It's good to be quick to see where people are right, otherwise you'll always under-estimate your opponents.