Stop fucking around with both Breitbart and Disqus. Both are cucked and converged and absolutely not worth your time. There's nothing to learn there, no one will listen to you there, and they actually do more harm than good by blurring the line between the right wing and conservatives. If you're unaware of the difference, I'll post some links you'll find informative. Sorry for the tough love, dude, but I'm trying to help. Gave you an upvote, though.
Cool. Read about Russell Kirk, who wrote "The Conservative Mind" in 1953, which really defined the "conservative" movement, a philosophy that remained dominant until the 2000s. I don't recommend reading the book because it's an absolute waste of time. Just get the highlights. It's largely academic and philosophical, which means it has little or no real world usefulness.
Conservatism is being slowly shrugged off because those right of center have seen how it's failed in conserving traditional values. In other words, conservatism has never conserved a single thing.
The concepts in his book were picked up by the likes of William F. Buckley, Jr., and the Eastern Ivy League crowd. They acted as gatekeepers for against the right wing for entree into politics. They also never endorsed anything that would have protected America against her enemies foreign and abroad and were silent on the communist threat that was quite real at the time.
L. Brent Bozell, Jr., Buckely's brother-in-law, ghost wrote "Conscience of a Conservative" for Barry Goldwater, who repudiated the only organization who called for strong action against communists in the US, the John Birch Society in exchange for an endorsement from National Review magazine, Buckley's conservative periodical of some influence.
Since the early to mid 60s, no one right of center had a chance of entering politics without getting the endorsement from the conservative gatekeepers. This is conservatism's legacy, complete with it's kissing Israel's ass publicly. Conservatism meant cooperating with the left as long as everyone could get along. They were content to lose as long as they kept face. In other words, they were pussies who lost every time to the left. What they lost was traditional values, morals, defense against communism, and (further) jewish infiltration into power, and the start of neo-conservatism.
No links, but I'm sure you can find this information yourself. I hope this helps. Please post what you find.
Posted automatically (#102025) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here. (@TrialsAndTribulation: Click here to suppress your anonymous crosslink notifications)
view the rest of the comments →
TrialsAndTribulation ago
Stop fucking around with both Breitbart and Disqus. Both are cucked and converged and absolutely not worth your time. There's nothing to learn there, no one will listen to you there, and they actually do more harm than good by blurring the line between the right wing and conservatives. If you're unaware of the difference, I'll post some links you'll find informative. Sorry for the tough love, dude, but I'm trying to help. Gave you an upvote, though.
23238911? ago
im interested
23241444? ago
Cool. Read about Russell Kirk, who wrote "The Conservative Mind" in 1953, which really defined the "conservative" movement, a philosophy that remained dominant until the 2000s. I don't recommend reading the book because it's an absolute waste of time. Just get the highlights. It's largely academic and philosophical, which means it has little or no real world usefulness.
Conservatism is being slowly shrugged off because those right of center have seen how it's failed in conserving traditional values. In other words, conservatism has never conserved a single thing.
The concepts in his book were picked up by the likes of William F. Buckley, Jr., and the Eastern Ivy League crowd. They acted as gatekeepers for against the right wing for entree into politics. They also never endorsed anything that would have protected America against her enemies foreign and abroad and were silent on the communist threat that was quite real at the time.
L. Brent Bozell, Jr., Buckely's brother-in-law, ghost wrote "Conscience of a Conservative" for Barry Goldwater, who repudiated the only organization who called for strong action against communists in the US, the John Birch Society in exchange for an endorsement from National Review magazine, Buckley's conservative periodical of some influence.
Since the early to mid 60s, no one right of center had a chance of entering politics without getting the endorsement from the conservative gatekeepers. This is conservatism's legacy, complete with it's kissing Israel's ass publicly. Conservatism meant cooperating with the left as long as everyone could get along. They were content to lose as long as they kept face. In other words, they were pussies who lost every time to the left. What they lost was traditional values, morals, defense against communism, and (further) jewish infiltration into power, and the start of neo-conservatism.
No links, but I'm sure you can find this information yourself. I hope this helps. Please post what you find.
23236908? ago
This comment was linked from this anonymous v/QRV comment.
Posted automatically (#102025) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here. (@TrialsAndTribulation: Click here to suppress your anonymous crosslink notifications)
RoBatten ago
(((KikeBart))) controlled opposition . . .