You're denying a page hosted on voat.co with a direct link to the edon.garden domain is legit?

This is some serious double-speak, Rotteuxx. The only place Voat has ever linked to the Edon "About" page is in the links you and @Deshy have posted here. No one has provided any evidence that any goat could ever get to that edited page from anywhere on Voat, including from "an old Amalek post".

Furthermore, the archives show that page was edited after Putt moved to the new About page. I showed all that. So, yes @Crensch, @MadWorld @Argosciv and I are absolutely denying that dead page is "legit".

Do you have any evidence to prove that anybody else but Putt could have edited said page ? <-- Genuinely curious about that.

• The fact that Voat was severely DDOSed right after Putt moved to a new About url, during the period that Edon page was edited and Putt himself complained in the PreviewVoat chat that he had been betrayed by a "mole" is one factor.
• The fact that none of those who pointed out that page can show how they got there is another one.
• The fact that the submission introducing this "Voat is compromised" Edon narrative was deleted within 24 Hours and then the account submitting it was deleted the following week reeks pretty badly.
• The fact that anyone who points out the bullshit being pushed on this topic, like Crensch or me gets brigaded and derided with spoof accounts and claims we are being paid definitely shows fear of what we are saying.
• The fact those ginning up fear with this "Edon" narrative don't seem worried enough themselves to leave Voat is clear evidence they don't believe what they're saying.

Sorry fren, unless I missed it there was no proof presented that someone else but Putt had the keys to the kingdom and could have falsified that page.

@Madworld presented a very well written resume of his findings which led him to believe it was the only logical conclusion but that's not what I'm interested in.

"That's not what I'm interested in." <---- Logical conclusions drawn from the actual evidence are not interesting to you, but conclusions drawn from suspiciously unsupported claims are worth trying to scare people away from Voat. Sure. This itself is evidence of bad will on your part.

A person of good will would take the evidence of devious consensus cracking that we have presented and question the Edon narrative, not double down and dismiss it all while trying to silence it with downvotes.