A user here insists on posting explicit pornography on whatever without a NSFW tag. As far as I can tell, he posted the same video three times and didn't receive a single upvoat. That ought to tell a person something.
I wrote the following paragraph in response to his endless jew rationalizing about why he keeps doing this. This is what I see when I see women doing porn:
I hate knowing the girls have all been through some trauma that makes them end up doing porn. No self-respecting woman does porn for the thrill of it. No woman with any amount of self-worth wants to be recorded doing degrading things that should be reserved for herself and her husband. Someone did something depraved to them when they were younger, which traumatized them enough that they have trust issues with men, they have no boundaries which makes them vulnerable to men taking advantage of them, they desperately seek approval and affection from men but will never find it in porn, they reject good men who care for them and treat them well because they don't recognize it as genuine affection, and they destroy their lives for having done porn. I don't think it's obscene as much as I think it's incredibly sad and tragic for these young girls who do it.
Does anyone remembers August Ames, the performer who killed herself in 2017? Although she didn't talk about it much, she mentioned that she was molested more than a few times and she directly attributed it to her going into porn. Her story is not unique. The suicide rate in porn is high, and the producers have a policy not to talk about it, but they're well aware of it. The women describe themselves as thinking they have freedom to do as they please and that they're happy, but they're not anything of the kind. Often they describe it as a feeling of trying to fill a void where the better part of their humanity would be if they weren't traumatized. Now they fill it with impersonal sex and a lot of drugs. It's no coincidence that they all do a lot of drugs.
I've never seen gay porn because I've always found it disgusting, but I have just as much sympathy for the men who do gay porn. They went through traumatic abuse and express it in this way, just like women do. And they also do a lot of drugs to cover the pain and emptiness they usually feel inside.
That's why I don't want to see porn on Voat. It causes damage to literally everyone involved. If you have to post it, keep it in subs made for that purpose, so I can block it.
EDIT: The user who made the obnoxious posts was Joe McCarthy. Joe apparently has a number of alts, and he's been commenting here as weak_penis. I don't recommend discussing anything with him. Just call him a jew and that he argues like a jew and move on. Or don't. Do whatever you like, but just remember that he's cancer. I expect to see more porn from this provocateur.
view the rest of the comments →
Thereunto ago
Explicit sexual displays are sometimes used as a strategy to...
As an aspect of risk/reward, successful strategies that produce a perceived net benefit are often experienced as 'thrilling' and lead to repeated behaviour. Especially if the strategy is perceived to give you an advantage over competition which otherwise would be in a better position to win.
Different cultures have different interpretations of "self-respecting" and "pornographic". These precepts are derived from the cultural expectations for sexually exhibitionism. Is dancing tolerable? Is 'sexting' tolerable? Is a private video stream between a long-distance couple tolerable? Is a commissioned nude portrait tolerable? Is the kama sutra tolerable? Is public toplessness tolerable?
There is also the other side of the coin where too little exhibition is sometimes seen as culturally unacceptable. E.g. "No self-respecting woman should go to work without makeup" (makeup simulates sexual arousal) "Women should shave their body hair" (lack of body hair simulates youth) "Women should wear form fitting / feminine clothing" (to evidence reproductive fitness).
Sometimes the level of acceptable exhibition (and voyeurism) also depends on who it is for. Displays for an attractive prospective mate are considered acceptable where displays for an unattractive mate are shamed. And similarly, reception of displays by unintended, 'unworthy' prospects are shamed.
Where do you draw the line for acceptable exhibitions? And where do you draw the line for acceptable engagement of exhibitions?
SearchVoatBot ago
This comment was linked from this v/OccidentalEnclave submission by @Joe_McCarthy.
Posted automatically (#81445) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here. (@Thereunto: Click here to suppress your crosslink notifications from @Joe_McCarthy)
TrialsAndTribulation ago
That's a pretty long-winded, self-serving justification. But I don't believe in moral relativism, and your comment reeks of it. There's a reason there are rules of behavior and boundaries on what's socially acceptable.
blit416 ago
I'd venture: drugs are very expensive, and restrictive about what work you can do. Serious addiction means you can't keep a 9-5 etc, and you need a couple of hundred a day. Fuck psychobabble about exhibitionism, liberation, insecurity, validation.... and on and on
Crack costs soo much, and heroin lets you sleep after its all gone. Jews are ready to help with your needs, that and chinamen to some extent.
Thereunto ago
Different cultures have different norms. That said, Sodom and Gomorrah had a cultural norm, but a norm isn't necessarily moral. How do you determine what is moral?
These differ per culture. It's the reason you see discussions about Burkas, veils, public toplessness etc. What is decent? What is adverse to social well-being? And how do we come to these determinations?