Is there another place like Voat? I've about had it with this 'only working a third of the time' bullshit

Is there another place like Voat? I've about had it with this 'only working a third of the time' bullshit (whatever)

submitted 5.5 years ago by TestForScience

271 comments

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Not that I found. I read on Poal yesterday (when Voat was down, again) that now they have it so you can also see who dv's your comments (you have to be a certain level member). I bet that really pisses off fuckwit gabara and the SBBH fags. I think it is a great idea, and given how quickly I was attacked (by gabara) at the suggestion we do something similar here tells me all I need to know about them.

I am not jumping ship yet though. It gets frustrating but my loyalty won't allow me to quit.

link

Nosfewratsjews 5.5 years ago

I read on Poal yesterday (when Voat was down, again) that now they have it so you can also see who dv's your comments (you have to be a certain level member).

It's almost like nobody has ever made this recommendation before! ("What can be done?" #2: https://voat.co/v/ideasforvoat/3243355/). SBBH attacked that idea, too - what a (((coincidence)))!

SBBH has an embassy on Voat, it's just that their Voat tactics are not effective with Poal's technical system. Doesn't mean the joint Tel Aviv and Langley task force won't adapt, eventually.

Peter Thiel probably bought Putt out so he could experiment with the community (especially the Qews) using Palantir, and Poal.co is probably the by-design fallback to let Palantir study people migrating from one to the other, likely to monitor variances in behavior based on the rules and technical features. From one walled garden to another, so to speak, since Poal has just implemented the best of the recomendations on Voat that got ignored by Putt and the rest of the management over time.

Wouldn't be surprised if Putt isn't involved in develoment of a new platform, or even Poal since Poal keeps implementing all the Voat preview features and/or Voat's best recommended features by the user-base. Voat might as well be abandoned at this point, and if I was Putt I sure as hell wouldn't advertise the new location because the SBBH Jew/FBI subversives and the brainless useless eater Qew plebs would follow like a horde of locusts and destroy the new location just like they consumed and destroyed Voat.

At what point does all this become as obvious to the rest of you as it already is to us? How many more times does reality need to beat you over the head before you see what's going on?

link

subscribetopewdiepie 5.5 years ago

What killed voat was idiots calling for violence and got the site served by the feds.

link

Wahaha 5.5 years ago

What killed voat was the feds calling for violence and got the site served by the feds.

What?

link

MOGA 5.5 years ago

A while back 5 or so bad actors started making posts and comments directly calling for and threatening violence on various specific individuals. It was obvious they were intentionally posting shit that regular users would never post, and they did it all of a sudden and coordinated.

It was a matter of debate whether they were working for a news outlet or an agency. It seemed to me just so they could tell their bosses "Look, 20 different people upvoated this call for murder" or "5 different people commented approvingly" so either Vice could write a story "exposing the illegality and viciousness of the supremacists" or Agent Smith could get a warrant for user information/ IP logs from Voat.

Regardless of who initiated it, Smith got his warrants first, and Putt had to make a post telling Voat to "cool it with the threats" and explaining how he had to 'cooperate with law enforcement' without going into the specifics that a gag order would silence. Vice posted an article almost immediately after Putt made the post, decrying how Voat's admin had to berate it's users for being violent white supremacists. The warrant canary hasn't been updated since.

link

Chimaira92 5.5 years ago

I think thats a bit too black and white.

Comments like "Americans have the right to regulate themselves as an armed militia unit, this is the proper reasoning behind the 2nd Amendment" could be considered a call to violence.

It was obvious they were intentionally posting shit that regular users would never post, and they did it all of a sudden and coordinated.

Can you link to any archives of any of the posts?

link

MOGA 5.5 years ago

I didn't archive anything, just telling Wahaha what I observed. There were a lot of direct targeting comments made. There was a post about a NYT writer that someone had commented with his twitter handle and address and said something like "We need to shoot this guy in the head, who here is close to this neighborhood, pm me" and others along the same lines.

Anyone who has been here more than a week knows there is a huge difference between saying "When shtf the bankers need to be strung up first" and saying "this specific branch manager is Jewish, here is a picture of his car, someone needs to / I'm going to / plant a bomb." Most know of the line between a political view (Blacks are destroying my city) and a direct threat/ call to violence (This specific black person robbed a liquor store in my city and we need to execute him).

I only saw directly 3 different accounts, and the ages were 6 mo, 8 mo, and 1.3 years and they all had several hundred to a thousand scp/ccp, so it seemed on the surface to be regular users.