Is there another place like Voat? I've about had it with this 'only working a third of the time' bullshit (whatever)

submitted ago by TestForScience

I like posting.

I like commenting.

I like reading people's posts.

I like reading people's comments.

I can't fucking do that here because the site is only working 1/3 of the time and halfway operational another 1/3 of the time, and finally, flat out broke the last 1/3 of the time.

Even when it's working, you have to wait, sometimes up to ten minutes, sometime more, before you can even view your own posts.

Icing on the cake is that it just keeps getting worse and worse.

Please tell me there's another Voat out there, somewhere.

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

blumen4alles ago

Not that I found. I read on Poal yesterday (when Voat was down, again) that now they have it so you can also see who dv's your comments (you have to be a certain level member). I bet that really pisses off fuckwit gabara and the SBBH fags. I think it is a great idea, and given how quickly I was attacked (by gabara) at the suggestion we do something similar here tells me all I need to know about them.

I am not jumping ship yet though. It gets frustrating but my loyalty won't allow me to quit.

Nosfewratsjews ago

I read on Poal yesterday (when Voat was down, again) that now they have it so you can also see who dv's your comments (you have to be a certain level member).

It's almost like nobody has ever made this recommendation before! ("What can be done?" #2: https://voat.co/v/ideasforvoat/3243355/). SBBH attacked that idea, too - what a (((coincidence)))!

SBBH has an embassy on Voat, it's just that their Voat tactics are not effective with Poal's technical system. Doesn't mean the joint Tel Aviv and Langley task force won't adapt, eventually.

Peter Thiel probably bought Putt out so he could experiment with the community (especially the Qews) using Palantir, and Poal.co is probably the by-design fallback to let Palantir study people migrating from one to the other, likely to monitor variances in behavior based on the rules and technical features. From one walled garden to another, so to speak, since Poal has just implemented the best of the recomendations on Voat that got ignored by Putt and the rest of the management over time.

Wouldn't be surprised if Putt isn't involved in develoment of a new platform, or even Poal since Poal keeps implementing all the Voat preview features and/or Voat's best recommended features by the user-base. Voat might as well be abandoned at this point, and if I was Putt I sure as hell wouldn't advertise the new location because the SBBH Jew/FBI subversives and the brainless useless eater Qew plebs would follow like a horde of locusts and destroy the new location just like they consumed and destroyed Voat.

At what point does all this become as obvious to the rest of you as it already is to us? How many more times does reality need to beat you over the head before you see what's going on?

Chimaira92 ago

Wouldn't be surprised if Putt isn't involved in develoment of a new platform, or even Poal since Poal keeps implementing all the Voat preview features and/or Voat's best recommended features by the user-base.

Thats because the people who went and made Poal were loyal users to Putt/Atko who helped implement key features and the main issue was that the Canary was never updated in a timely fashion, making it essentially useless. Thats if I recall correctly.

Phantom42 ago

Hey, you said Qews!

Finally someone else uses it.

Nosfewratsjews ago

It's the most accurate description for the subset of users we could come up with.

Phantom42 ago

Indeed.

subscribetopewdiepie ago

What killed voat was idiots calling for violence and got the site served by the feds.

Wahaha ago

What killed voat was the feds calling for violence and got the site served by the feds.

What?

MOGA ago

A while back 5 or so bad actors started making posts and comments directly calling for and threatening violence on various specific individuals. It was obvious they were intentionally posting shit that regular users would never post, and they did it all of a sudden and coordinated.

It was a matter of debate whether they were working for a news outlet or an agency. It seemed to me just so they could tell their bosses "Look, 20 different people upvoated this call for murder" or "5 different people commented approvingly" so either Vice could write a story "exposing the illegality and viciousness of the supremacists" or Agent Smith could get a warrant for user information/ IP logs from Voat.

Regardless of who initiated it, Smith got his warrants first, and Putt had to make a post telling Voat to "cool it with the threats" and explaining how he had to 'cooperate with law enforcement' without going into the specifics that a gag order would silence. Vice posted an article almost immediately after Putt made the post, decrying how Voat's admin had to berate it's users for being violent white supremacists. The warrant canary hasn't been updated since.

Chimaira92 ago

I think thats a bit too black and white.

Comments like "Americans have the right to regulate themselves as an armed militia unit, this is the proper reasoning behind the 2nd Amendment" could be considered a call to violence.

It was obvious they were intentionally posting shit that regular users would never post, and they did it all of a sudden and coordinated.

Can you link to any archives of any of the posts?

MOGA ago

I didn't archive anything, just telling Wahaha what I observed. There were a lot of direct targeting comments made. There was a post about a NYT writer that someone had commented with his twitter handle and address and said something like "We need to shoot this guy in the head, who here is close to this neighborhood, pm me" and others along the same lines.

Anyone who has been here more than a week knows there is a huge difference between saying "When shtf the bankers need to be strung up first" and saying "this specific branch manager is Jewish, here is a picture of his car, someone needs to / I'm going to / plant a bomb." Most know of the line between a political view (Blacks are destroying my city) and a direct threat/ call to violence (This specific black person robbed a liquor store in my city and we need to execute him).

I only saw directly 3 different accounts, and the ages were 6 mo, 8 mo, and 1.3 years and they all had several hundred to a thousand scp/ccp, so it seemed on the surface to be regular users.

capnflummox ago

Vice posted an article

All you stated was invalidated by this sentence fragment.

TheWorstImaginable ago

I've done that, indirectly. Violence is the only thing that will save us.

subscribetopewdiepie ago

So organize anti government acts on a board monitored by the government?

TheWorstImaginable ago

Not organize, raise awareness that things are going to have to get gnarly

subscribetopewdiepie ago

If that's all people were doing voat wouldn't have gotten served.

TheWorstImaginable ago

I think it's been shown that most incitement, child porn posts etc have historically been saboteur types. I could be wrong.

Broc_Lia ago

Everywhere is monitored by the government. If you can sign up and post, then so can an alphabet boi.

subscribetopewdiepie ago

So again, what are you trying to accomplish?

Chimaira92 ago

The utilisation of Free Speech.

The governments should fear the citizens, not the other way around.

H3r0n ago

Kill all lobbyists

Nosfewratsjews ago

Uhh, no. What killed Voat was the management abandoning it.

subscribetopewdiepie ago

Putt admitted to being served awhile back, that's why he went quiet.

StarbuckAndCasey ago

When/if he comes back and makes a comment/post you will see slurpy dick-sucking replies the jews would be proud of.

Hyst ago

Genuine question, do you not remember Putt siding with the Qtards asking the rest of the community to treat them kindly because Putt said he liked them and wanted them here?

I mean aren't we also still in isolation mode?

DrSelfAppointed ago

https://i.imgtc.ws/KwziMvq.jpg

The great betrayal. Never Forget.

Hyst ago

Ohmylordthough-- How could I have known about that situation I described. I DIDN'T EXIST BACK THEN!?

Nosfewratsjews ago

Was it before or after the "Angel" investor?

Hyst ago

Actually well before it if I'm remembering correctly. It was around the very first wave of the Qultists.

Nosfewratsjews ago

So back when Putt was still trying to figure out how to monetize Voat.. before the "Angel" investor.

blumen4alles ago

I don't think he was looking for money for the Q-cumbers. He was looking for numbers. It seemed to almost double our user-base very quickly. I don't mind them for the most part. I try to be nice and help when I can, they seem to be good people with their hearts/intentions in the right place. Granted many of their submissions aren't the best, and it annoys me how almost every QRV post is anonymous & tagged NSFW - when it isn't NSFW, and I dislike anon stuff for the most part.

Still, they are exposed to many red pills if they use this site, even if they mostly stick to their Q related subs. Most of my front page is now HDLunited or hiddenlol - they are an active group with great content that reminds me of old Voat.

I try to give them a break, after all they are just another version of myself.

Hyst ago

There's honestly something that separates the cultists from the rest of Voaters though. In my eyes they're not much better than SJWs, because after being lied to a thousand times they're still zealots. There's no reasoning with them. I try to be kind as well, and at first I had patience with them and would try to engage them in conversation-- but it was useless. I mean seriously though, I would ask them pretty straight forward questions about some of the known Q predictions that fell flat and they would straight up say that Q never made those predictions. Then it's like ok well the community certainly believed it and was regurgitating it over and over. Oh those were just shills. It's kind of mind numbing.

I mean they were seriously pushing the idea that secret military tribunals were killing off high level "traitors". If you ask them about that now they act like you're a crazy shill. It's fucking insane...

And much like SJWs, if you ask them to put their beliefs in their own words they're almost always incapable of doing so. They just regurgitate talking points.

kneo24 ago

I try to be nice and help when I can, they seem to be good people with their hearts/intentions in the right place.

The road to hell is paved with good intentions.

tokui ago

the nsfw is bc of soapfaggots bullying there with porn.

fault: soap civnat kikes

963189_137 ago

Why are the Qews so retarded? How many of them are chatbots?

Nosfewratsjews ago

I have heavy opinions here, but no evidence so I will abstain from sharing my theories.

With that said, the number of chatbots or news posting propaganda bots on Voat are both Legion, and not limited to just the Qews safe spaces.

963189_137 ago

Yep, I agree. They probably couldn't 'master the human domain' without them. Anything to keep the prols from revolting against an illegitimate and unfair 'globalist government' full of subhumans that will enslave us and our children (not that there is any difference between the jew government and the subhuman trash government that came after it).

Nosfewratsjews ago

Q was the best PSYOP for the "Homer Simpson" part of the US Citizen population I've ever seen.

963189_137 ago

Truth! I can't believe how rabid those cult members are...and how strange their beliefs are when you get into it with them. They actually believe that if WW1WAG things would be different than they are now...how crazy is that? I mean, if WE ALL GO THERE, HOW CAN THINGS BE DIFFERENT? Hell-O?

Nosfewratsjews ago

There is no such thing as a non-violent Revolution.

Government does not fix itself.

Anyone who tries to convince you that the worlds problems will be solved if you just don't do anything and let them handle it with your best interest in mind is peddling lies you are responsible for seeing through.

You can't save everyone. Not everyone should be saved.

963189_137 ago

Truth again. I wouldn't even want to try. I am only interested in my own people and of those, only the productive people who are not parasitic on society.