That's really not a big deal. If you think a 17 year old fucking anybody is bad then you are bluepilled. There is no actual argument for "young fertile women who are fully physically developed should not have sex" other than "I don't like it". Age of consent only exists because feminism has prevented fathers from making decisions about whom their daughters spread for, so they try to use the state to help them out. But even then it's nonsensical, because a young woman is much better off fucking an established older man who is capable of forming a family with her. Fathers who'd prefer their daughters bang other teenagers are retarded.
Again none of this would be an issue if fathers could just marry them off to men who'd make good husbands and beat them/keep them in the house as punishment for being sluts.
You are talking about some mythical unicorn among men. Men that chase these young girls chase them because they are naive and will miss all the red flags about their shitty personalities. They aren't looking to maximize fertility, they are looking for someone to abuse and manipulate.
Hardly. Some guys just find younger girls attractive. Theres a reason that schoolgirl outfit are one of the biggest sellers in sex shops.
Indeed if she was 18 this wouldnt be an issue and you wouldnt be crying about it, but absolutely no physical or mental change magically takes place between 17 and 18. You just use 18 as a cutoff because the government told you its the cutoff. Literally just blindly following what the Jew tells ypu
Finding someone attractive is different from taking that step to pursuing them out of pure lust. There will always be exceptions but you will find very few examples of these much older men doing right by young maidens in our modern times. These girls are exploited to signal status and quickly disposed of when the older man grows weary of the retardness that is a 17 year old.
This is actually surprisingly concisely rational from you.
You're missing the glaring difference though: this man was in a situation where he was likely exploiting her for sex. Back in the days before parenthood was shamed, men sought fertile females as their top priority, which then deviated out to beauty, competence, intelligence, etc.
The difference now is that too many influences have eroded the pair bonding that used to be strongly present in most couples. Now that that's mostly gone, what you see is largely one person exploiting the other in virtually every case.
You are using a text book strategy to attempt to discredit and chill the speech of a female by hoping I will respond with incredulity from which point you will continue to work irrational childish female area.
Now, where you consistently fail in this strategy is that you lack the skill to reinforce your own 'authority' and you also lack the skills to build 'rapport'.
Basically, not only are you a kike shill, you aren't smart enough to have made headway into any community on voat because you lack certain soft skills. Boomer employers especially often mistake verboseness for intelligence and sociability. You were a bad hire.
Unfortunately, because you are a kike, the oven is the only cure for your condition so this reply does not contain any constructive criticism.
This makes you look small, female or not. Respect yourself.
you provided no criticism
Yeah, I guess you're right. We ended up just agreeing. But the comment before the one I replied to is where you really went full retard:
They aren't looking to maximize fertility, they are looking for someone to abuse and manipulate.
Nah, men like youthful women. Their hormones very explicitly conscript their search for youth. Take a flush complexion for example - this denotes fertility in women. This is why men prefer women of such a complexion .
But, let's get in to what's really upset you here: https://voat.co/v/whatever/3334415/19743820 this comment features a very obvious explanation for your reacting the way you did in the original comment you made in this chain.
You are talking about some mythical unicorn among men. Men that chase these young girls chase them because they are naive and will miss all the red flags about their shitty personalities. They aren't looking to maximize fertility, they are looking for someone to abuse and manipulate.
We aren't talking about a unicorn of men. In fact, we're talking about the fucking mean of men.
Now that that's out of the way, let's do some psychoanalysis so you really freak the fuck out:
Before, it didn't matter that a young wife, 15, was cared for and provided for by her husband, likely 30+. But now that women think women are too stupid to have sex without being a certain age, the whole paradigm is hurting. Besides, it's very clearly just a tactic of feminists who are fearfully approaching the wall to take away some of the options of younger and more fertile females.
But, if it wasn't for the feminists freaking out about getting less attention, we never would have been able to afford the option to young men to have their lives ruined because a slutty young girl decided she wanted to do something she was told not to in order to test her boundaries.
Look at that, before I even saw your comment, I had you pinned to the fucking nose.
Why don't you think men can exist (or hardly exist) who enjoy more youthful women? Why don't you think these mythical men can tolerate the more youthful women? Why do you think men who percieve these youthful women as attractive are naive? Why are they going to miss red flags about their shitty personalities (projection)? Why do you think they're looking to abuse and manipulate someone?
I can tell you pretty plainly - it's because you're a desperate feminist approaching the wall who's freaking about about getting less attention while she sees youth extract that very attention she used to gain. Now you're upset with men in general, and have dedicated portions of your time to attempt to give them shitty advice, as well as young girls, to sprinkle in your moronic and failing diatribes with the very clear intent to spoil the mating pool and further drown young men and women in reasons they shouldn't do things you don't want them to do.
Now, let's keep going, shall we?
You are using a text book strategy to attempt to discredit and chill the speech of a female by hoping I will respond with incredulity from which point you will continue to work irrational childish female area.
I'm not. I'm accusing you of cracking consensus, astroturfing me, and I'm pointing out your methods so all can see - namely your strawman - which makes it easier to disagree with me as well as insisting others join you.
you lack the skill to reinforce your own 'authority' and you also lack the skills to build 'rapport'.
That first part may be true, but I'm more convinced that you see my not caring what you think of my username (which people care about at this site, for some reason) as me lacking skill. I don't give half a fuck if you notice or even care about my "authority" (which I have exactly none of, and will readily admit that if ever asked). Not only that, but why the fuck would I want to build rapport with a bunch of idiot normies like you?
Basically, not only are you a kike shill, you aren't smart enough to have made headway into any community on voat because you lack certain soft skills. Boomer employers especially often mistake verboseness for intelligence and sociability. You were a bad hire.
Not only am I very clearly not "Jewish", I'm certainly not paid to do anything. Hell, I'm not even employed. Besides, I think you're confusing my being verbose for my having autism (spectrum).
Unfortunately, because you are a kike
You know who else constantly repeats the same mantras over and over again, hoping their repeated speech will morph reality to their liking? Kikes... MSM, HRC used it popularly during the election cycle. Barry LOVED talking about change, despite the only changes he made ending up being empirically worse when it was very explicitly conveyed that he meant positive change. Where else does this branch out? Oh, feminism, you know, your favorite, basically anything about going to war, you know the whole Mockingbird bit.
view the rest of the comments →
yewotm8 ago
That's really not a big deal. If you think a 17 year old fucking anybody is bad then you are bluepilled. There is no actual argument for "young fertile women who are fully physically developed should not have sex" other than "I don't like it". Age of consent only exists because feminism has prevented fathers from making decisions about whom their daughters spread for, so they try to use the state to help them out. But even then it's nonsensical, because a young woman is much better off fucking an established older man who is capable of forming a family with her. Fathers who'd prefer their daughters bang other teenagers are retarded.
Again none of this would be an issue if fathers could just marry them off to men who'd make good husbands and beat them/keep them in the house as punishment for being sluts.
Le_Squish ago
You are talking about some mythical unicorn among men. Men that chase these young girls chase them because they are naive and will miss all the red flags about their shitty personalities. They aren't looking to maximize fertility, they are looking for someone to abuse and manipulate.
bubby963 ago
Hardly. Some guys just find younger girls attractive. Theres a reason that schoolgirl outfit are one of the biggest sellers in sex shops.
Indeed if she was 18 this wouldnt be an issue and you wouldnt be crying about it, but absolutely no physical or mental change magically takes place between 17 and 18. You just use 18 as a cutoff because the government told you its the cutoff. Literally just blindly following what the Jew tells ypu
Le_Squish ago
Finding someone attractive is different from taking that step to pursuing them out of pure lust. There will always be exceptions but you will find very few examples of these much older men doing right by young maidens in our modern times. These girls are exploited to signal status and quickly disposed of when the older man grows weary of the retardness that is a 17 year old.
NotHereForPizza ago
This is actually surprisingly concisely rational from you.
You're missing the glaring difference though: this man was in a situation where he was likely exploiting her for sex. Back in the days before parenthood was shamed, men sought fertile females as their top priority, which then deviated out to beauty, competence, intelligence, etc.
The difference now is that too many influences have eroded the pair bonding that used to be strongly present in most couples. Now that that's mostly gone, what you see is largely one person exploiting the other in virtually every case.
Indeed, things have changed.
Le_Squish ago
Kike, don't you have some disinfo to spread? Always coming round here pretending to be people.
NotHereForPizza ago
It's awfully apparent that me being something you don't like is preferred by you.
It would obviously be easier to dispute things I say if I were something everyone else also doesn't like, right?
Is this why you frame things this way, to manipulate the perception of the confrontation?
Take criticism like an adult. Reacting like a child will only get you treated like one.
Le_Squish ago
You haven't levied any constructive criticism.
You are using a text book strategy to attempt to discredit and chill the speech of a female by hoping I will respond with incredulity from which point you will continue to work irrational childish female area.
Now, where you consistently fail in this strategy is that you lack the skill to reinforce your own 'authority' and you also lack the skills to build 'rapport'.
Basically, not only are you a kike shill, you aren't smart enough to have made headway into any community on voat because you lack certain soft skills. Boomer employers especially often mistake verboseness for intelligence and sociability. You were a bad hire.
Unfortunately, because you are a kike, the oven is the only cure for your condition so this reply does not contain any constructive criticism.
NotHereForPizza ago
Actually, this one might be fun.
First off we have:
This makes you look small, female or not. Respect yourself.
Yeah, I guess you're right. We ended up just agreeing. But the comment before the one I replied to is where you really went full retard:
Nah, men like youthful women. Their hormones very explicitly conscript their search for youth. Take a flush complexion for example - this denotes fertility in women. This is why men prefer women of such a complexion .
But, let's get in to what's really upset you here: https://voat.co/v/whatever/3334415/19743820 this comment features a very obvious explanation for your reacting the way you did in the original comment you made in this chain.
We aren't talking about a unicorn of men. In fact, we're talking about the fucking mean of men.
Now that that's out of the way, let's do some psychoanalysis so you really freak the fuck out:
Look at that, before I even saw your comment, I had you pinned to the fucking nose.
Why don't you think men can exist (or hardly exist) who enjoy more youthful women? Why don't you think these mythical men can tolerate the more youthful women? Why do you think men who percieve these youthful women as attractive are naive? Why are they going to miss red flags about their shitty personalities (projection)? Why do you think they're looking to abuse and manipulate someone?
I can tell you pretty plainly - it's because you're a desperate feminist approaching the wall who's freaking about about getting less attention while she sees youth extract that very attention she used to gain. Now you're upset with men in general, and have dedicated portions of your time to attempt to give them shitty advice, as well as young girls, to sprinkle in your moronic and failing diatribes with the very clear intent to spoil the mating pool and further drown young men and women in reasons they shouldn't do things you don't want them to do.
Now, let's keep going, shall we?
I'm not. I'm accusing you of cracking consensus, astroturfing me, and I'm pointing out your methods so all can see - namely your strawman - which makes it easier to disagree with me as well as insisting others join you.
That first part may be true, but I'm more convinced that you see my not caring what you think of my username (which people care about at this site, for some reason) as me lacking skill. I don't give half a fuck if you notice or even care about my "authority" (which I have exactly none of, and will readily admit that if ever asked). Not only that, but why the fuck would I want to build rapport with a bunch of idiot normies like you?
Not only am I very clearly not "Jewish", I'm certainly not paid to do anything. Hell, I'm not even employed. Besides, I think you're confusing my being verbose for my having autism (spectrum).
You know who else constantly repeats the same mantras over and over again, hoping their repeated speech will morph reality to their liking? Kikes... MSM, HRC used it popularly during the election cycle. Barry LOVED talking about change, despite the only changes he made ending up being empirically worse when it was very explicitly conveyed that he meant positive change. Where else does this branch out? Oh, feminism, you know, your favorite, basically anything about going to war, you know the whole Mockingbird bit.
Now grow up and stop acting like a prepubescent.
Goys-R-Us ago
You're trying way too hard faggot. STFU. Nobody but you read that wall of shit.
NotHereForPizza ago
Le_Squish ago
Yes, I made you write a book.
[Smug noises INTENSIFIES!!!]
Also tl:dr. Verbose!=smart. Be concise kike boi.
NotHereForPizza ago
That's what I thought, retard.
Le_Squish ago
Not my fault you can't form concise thoughts, bad-hire. They should demote you to astroturfing yahoo or something more your speed.
NotHereForPizza ago
So you don't want to talk about how wrong you are? Are you just going to steer us away from you being an obvious feminist now?
Le_Squish ago
Oh, lawdy, bad hire can't figure out his angle of attack on his own. I hear a certain user got Excell sheet for days that could help you.
NotHereForPizza ago
It's funny that you claimed I framed you as being incredulous... even though that's the exact way you're acting.
Is the incessantly repeating the same mantra thing really a successful strategy for you?
Le_Squish ago
Have you decided your next angle of attack or what?
NotHereForPizza ago
It seems like you're just being stupid on purpose.
Le_Squish ago
So you don't know what attack angle you want to try next? Don't you got a handbook to help with those things?
NotHereForPizza ago
Just keep doubling down. I'm sure it'll work on someone.
Le_Squish ago
All I want if for you to stop being shit at your job. Voat deserves better shills.
NotHereForPizza ago
You're an idiot. All you have is Alinsky
Le_Squish ago
Bad hire tier reply.