That's really not a big deal. If you think a 17 year old fucking anybody is bad then you are bluepilled. There is no actual argument for "young fertile women who are fully physically developed should not have sex" other than "I don't like it". Age of consent only exists because feminism has prevented fathers from making decisions about whom their daughters spread for, so they try to use the state to help them out. But even then it's nonsensical, because a young woman is much better off fucking an established older man who is capable of forming a family with her. Fathers who'd prefer their daughters bang other teenagers are retarded.
Again none of this would be an issue if fathers could just marry them off to men who'd make good husbands and beat them/keep them in the house as punishment for being sluts.
Before, it didn't matter that a young wife, 15, was cared for and provided for by her husband, likely 30+. But now that women think women are too stupid to have sex without being a certain age, the whole paradigm is hurting. Besides, it's very clearly just a tactic of feminists who are fearfully approaching the wall to take away some of the options of younger and more fertile females.
Now, there's a very fucking big difference between a woman being fully developed and still being a child. Age doesn't establish this across the board for all women, so humans in more civilized societies decided on an appropriate mean. For whatever reason, science chose 16 in most places. Frankly, I think this is pretty fair, but punishing people in low-income situations, low-IQ situations, or low-competence situations because they take a wife before they're both technically mature enough for it doesn't exactly make a ton of sense to me, more specifically if they're in a third-world country.
But this situation or the philosophies that inspire it cannot and should not be taken advantage of as an avenue for rationalizing pedophilia. Pedophilia damages underdeveloped individuals because it stimulates them sexually before they're sexually developed. Along with plenty of other things, one of the biggest issues this causes is sexual development during pubescence. This reason alone is enough to stay away from girl that aren't teenagers. Even then, 13 or 14 is still too young. Hell, I still remember in the 90s when 15 year old girls would bring home guys in their mid twenties... But, if it wasn't for the feminists freaking out about getting less attention, we never would have been able to afford the option to young men to have their lives ruined because a slutty young girl decided she wanted to do something she was told not to in order to test her boundaries.
So, yeah, this whole situation gets very sticky very fast.
view the rest of the comments →
yewotm8 ago
That's really not a big deal. If you think a 17 year old fucking anybody is bad then you are bluepilled. There is no actual argument for "young fertile women who are fully physically developed should not have sex" other than "I don't like it". Age of consent only exists because feminism has prevented fathers from making decisions about whom their daughters spread for, so they try to use the state to help them out. But even then it's nonsensical, because a young woman is much better off fucking an established older man who is capable of forming a family with her. Fathers who'd prefer their daughters bang other teenagers are retarded.
Again none of this would be an issue if fathers could just marry them off to men who'd make good husbands and beat them/keep them in the house as punishment for being sluts.
NotHereForPizza ago
The problem is an erosion of pair bonding.
Before, it didn't matter that a young wife, 15, was cared for and provided for by her husband, likely 30+. But now that women think women are too stupid to have sex without being a certain age, the whole paradigm is hurting. Besides, it's very clearly just a tactic of feminists who are fearfully approaching the wall to take away some of the options of younger and more fertile females.
Now, there's a very fucking big difference between a woman being fully developed and still being a child. Age doesn't establish this across the board for all women, so humans in more civilized societies decided on an appropriate mean. For whatever reason, science chose 16 in most places. Frankly, I think this is pretty fair, but punishing people in low-income situations, low-IQ situations, or low-competence situations because they take a wife before they're both technically mature enough for it doesn't exactly make a ton of sense to me, more specifically if they're in a third-world country.
But this situation or the philosophies that inspire it cannot and should not be taken advantage of as an avenue for rationalizing pedophilia. Pedophilia damages underdeveloped individuals because it stimulates them sexually before they're sexually developed. Along with plenty of other things, one of the biggest issues this causes is sexual development during pubescence. This reason alone is enough to stay away from girl that aren't teenagers. Even then, 13 or 14 is still too young. Hell, I still remember in the 90s when 15 year old girls would bring home guys in their mid twenties... But, if it wasn't for the feminists freaking out about getting less attention, we never would have been able to afford the option to young men to have their lives ruined because a slutty young girl decided she wanted to do something she was told not to in order to test her boundaries.
So, yeah, this whole situation gets very sticky very fast.