This looks like a case of the pot calling the kettle black, but you think you can claim the high ground because someone in a position of authority did it to you, instead of you doing it to someone else.
Didn't you go around telling everyone it didn't matter anyway because everything was archived by everyone else? Do you now understand how big of a hypocrite you're being here?
This looks like a case of the pot calling the kettle black, but you think you can claim the high ground because someone in a position of authority did it to you, instead of you doing it to someone else.
Didn't you go around telling everyone it didn't matter anyway because everything was archived by everyone else? Do you now understand how big of a hypocrite you're being here?
Quoting for future reference now that I've got your posting history locked down, including your deleted posts.
The more you change the subject and don't actually address anything, the more of a faggot shill you look like. So.. keep it up. And keep asking for shekels while you make your compilation posts too. You keep doing the work for the rest of us.
The fact is, virge, one doesn't need to post a question for you to address comments that are being made. This is more of you sidestepping the obvious, your blatant hypocrisy and tactics to look like a person on the side of "right". You have done this consistently, and when called out on it, you just go, "not uh!" and then continue to do it.
The smart thing to do would to not do these things that people can easily call you out for.
I find it insanely strange of you to tell someone to "delete" something, as in, "to hide it", when according to you, searchvoat bot auto archives everything.
I also find it insanely strange of you to cry over being banned when for a time, you were being a huge faggot in your own subverse when people were using it legitimately. Even after you stopped, you only did so, not because you understood that it was wrong or cared that it was wrong, but only because of the backlash.
This is stuff people have pointed out to you before, of course. They tell you that you're a hypocrite often, and you dance around it.
I find it insanely strange of you to tell someone to "delete" something, as in, "to hide it", when according to you, searchvoat bot auto archives everything.
Respectfully, please refresh my memory.
Either way, I'll just be candid now and say there is a basic OpSec methodology called "poisoning the well". Regardless of if it was a mistake or otherwise, both are effective for this and thus legitimate mistakes are sometimes best left unresolved. How exciting!
I also find it insanely strange of you to cry over being banned when for a time, you were being a huge faggot in your own subverse when people were using it legitimately.
Two high-profile users were banned, and subsequently made a rather large fuss over it. Consider the possibility this was intended to happen.
Even after you stopped, you only did so, not because you understood that it was wrong or cared that it was wrong, but only because of the backlash.
This is stuff people have pointed out to you before, of course. They tell you that you're a hypocrite often, and you dance around it.
No I don't. I simply ignore it, because by very nature of the very boundaries I have set I have no choice but to be a hypocrite at times. If that's going to put your panties into a bunch then I can't help you.
Either way, I'll just be candid now and say there is a basic OpSec methodology called "poisoning the well". Regardless of if it was a mistake or otherwise, both are effective for this and thus legitimate mistakes are sometimes best left unresolved. How exciting!
Yes, and its comments like this that lead people to believe you're not a normal user, but instead work for a group. And then you cry when people point out to you how your actions look.
Two high-profile users were banned, and subsequently made a rather large fuss over it. Consider the possibility this was intended to happen.
You're not as powerful as you think you are, but you keep telling yourself that. People are already on to you. They were over a month ago. They will continue to be on to you.
Reality tells a different story, but you go ahead and keep peddling that line.
No I don't. I simply ignore it, because by very nature of the very boundaries I have set I have no choice but to be a hypocrite at times. If that's going to put your panties into a bunch then I can't help you.
But you actually do. You'd rather hurl insults, call them a type 9000 shill bot master. Here you are again, lying. You're also insinuating that you're hypocritical on purpose, which indicates you have loose moral boundaries. Congratulations, you're a piece of shit.
"DELETE IT FAST THELMA" was an insult. A jibe. Because thelma deleted my comments in SBBH.
Yes, and its comments like this that lead people to believe you're not a normal user, but instead work for a group. And then you cry when people point out to you how your actions look.
That's preposterous. I'm an American Citizen that knows my Government is the prime offender on spying on everyone and the rest of the Western World is just following suit like a bunch of lemmings because the U.S. is their Military defense force.
I have to develop protective methods, and some of the best are copying my (and yours?) oppressive overlords.
The very basis of OpSec means I've spun so much poison into the post history to throw off the G-man as the primary objective, of course there will be collateral damage to that.
I'm not here to convince you one way or the other, frankly, because by the very nature of the protection I employ it would violate the boundaries I set anyway. I sure as hell don't want to probe you for info about you, because I don't want you to doxx yourself either.
I've always held a strong suspicion it's the ones that ask so many questions that are the ones you should trust the least.
You're not as powerful as you think you are, but you keep telling yourself that. People are already on to you. They were over a month ago. They will continue to be on to you.
And they're all wrong, so what does that say about them? The people watching me are the people I want watching me. Period. I'm speaking to an audience. Some are getting warnings. Others threats. You've demonstrated quite clearly you don't have any clue how to tell the difference.
I've demonstrated time and time again how easy it is to engage the users I'm working on finishing my decision on which side they're on. I can't help it if you think you've got me all figured out, because the very fact that you think you've got me figured out means my defenses are successful.
Reality tells a different story, but you go ahead and keep peddling that line.
Ok. Illustrate it, then. Show some evidence. Maybe then you'll see where you're missing a few pieces of this particular puzzle.
You're also insinuating that you're hypocritical on purpose, which indicates you have loose moral boundaries. Congratulations, you're a piece of shit.
100% of what I post on Vote is for a reason. Including this. I only post what I am comfortable posting. The problem with you "moral types" is you're too easy for our mutual enemies to manipulate.
Motherfucker I spent 4 years compiling painful data on Voat. At times this accidentally DDOS'd the site, and I've always felt pretty bad for that, but I learned how to play nice with Cloudlare.
Is't it interesting that 50% of the worlds Internet traffic goes through Cloudflare? Just how private do you think that is?
view the rest of the comments →
kneo24 ago
This looks like a case of the pot calling the kettle black, but you think you can claim the high ground because someone in a position of authority did it to you, instead of you doing it to someone else.
Didn't you go around telling everyone it didn't matter anyway because everything was archived by everyone else? Do you now understand how big of a hypocrite you're being here?
virge ago
Quoting for future reference now that I've got your posting history locked down, including your deleted posts.
Like shooting fish in a barrel.
kneo24 ago
Cool, so which posts have I deleted? Why also won't you address the blatant hypocrisy of your actions?
virge ago
I'd rather laugh at the outright hilarious suggestion that you even understand my actions.
kneo24 ago
The more you change the subject and don't actually address anything, the more of a faggot shill you look like. So.. keep it up. And keep asking for shekels while you make your compilation posts too. You keep doing the work for the rest of us.
virge ago
Was there some kind of question?
Please.
kneo24 ago
The fact is, virge, one doesn't need to post a question for you to address comments that are being made. This is more of you sidestepping the obvious, your blatant hypocrisy and tactics to look like a person on the side of "right". You have done this consistently, and when called out on it, you just go, "not uh!" and then continue to do it.
The smart thing to do would to not do these things that people can easily call you out for.
virge ago
So now we go full circle because you've assumed things about my behavior that are not true. This would make your conclusions erroneous.
Now what?
kneo24 ago
None of what you wrote actually addresses what a giant hypocrite you are. Start there.
virge ago
Make an actual accusation instead of a baseless accusation and I will.
Stop being a pussy and speak plainly like a goddamn man for once.
kneo24 ago
I find it insanely strange of you to tell someone to "delete" something, as in, "to hide it", when according to you, searchvoat bot auto archives everything.
I also find it insanely strange of you to cry over being banned when for a time, you were being a huge faggot in your own subverse when people were using it legitimately. Even after you stopped, you only did so, not because you understood that it was wrong or cared that it was wrong, but only because of the backlash.
This is stuff people have pointed out to you before, of course. They tell you that you're a hypocrite often, and you dance around it.
virge ago
Respectfully, please refresh my memory.
Either way, I'll just be candid now and say there is a basic OpSec methodology called "poisoning the well". Regardless of if it was a mistake or otherwise, both are effective for this and thus legitimate mistakes are sometimes best left unresolved. How exciting!
Two high-profile users were banned, and subsequently made a rather large fuss over it. Consider the possibility this was intended to happen.
Neither, but thanks for playing. @kevdude
No I don't. I simply ignore it, because by very nature of the very boundaries I have set I have no choice but to be a hypocrite at times. If that's going to put your panties into a bunch then I can't help you.
kneo24 ago
How about the title?
Yes, and its comments like this that lead people to believe you're not a normal user, but instead work for a group. And then you cry when people point out to you how your actions look.
You're not as powerful as you think you are, but you keep telling yourself that. People are already on to you. They were over a month ago. They will continue to be on to you.
Reality tells a different story, but you go ahead and keep peddling that line.
But you actually do. You'd rather hurl insults, call them a type 9000 shill bot master. Here you are again, lying. You're also insinuating that you're hypocritical on purpose, which indicates you have loose moral boundaries. Congratulations, you're a piece of shit.
virge ago
"DELETE IT FAST THELMA" was an insult. A jibe. Because thelma deleted my comments in SBBH.
That's preposterous. I'm an American Citizen that knows my Government is the prime offender on spying on everyone and the rest of the Western World is just following suit like a bunch of lemmings because the U.S. is their Military defense force.
I have to develop protective methods, and some of the best are copying my (and yours?) oppressive overlords.
The very basis of OpSec means I've spun so much poison into the post history to throw off the G-man as the primary objective, of course there will be collateral damage to that.
I'm not here to convince you one way or the other, frankly, because by the very nature of the protection I employ it would violate the boundaries I set anyway. I sure as hell don't want to probe you for info about you, because I don't want you to doxx yourself either.
I've always held a strong suspicion it's the ones that ask so many questions that are the ones you should trust the least.
And they're all wrong, so what does that say about them? The people watching me are the people I want watching me. Period. I'm speaking to an audience. Some are getting warnings. Others threats. You've demonstrated quite clearly you don't have any clue how to tell the difference.
I've demonstrated time and time again how easy it is to engage the users I'm working on finishing my decision on which side they're on. I can't help it if you think you've got me all figured out, because the very fact that you think you've got me figured out means my defenses are successful.
Ok. Illustrate it, then. Show some evidence. Maybe then you'll see where you're missing a few pieces of this particular puzzle.
100% of what I post on Vote is for a reason. Including this. I only post what I am comfortable posting. The problem with you "moral types" is you're too easy for our mutual enemies to manipulate.
Motherfucker I spent 4 years compiling painful data on Voat. At times this accidentally DDOS'd the site, and I've always felt pretty bad for that, but I learned how to play nice with Cloudlare.
Is't it interesting that 50% of the worlds Internet traffic goes through Cloudflare? Just how private do you think that is?