I'm not jiving with some of the names on that ban log. EdSnowden was here for over 4 years, and I'd gotten used to seeing his name around. He just posted a few days ago about how much he 'loved Voat.' And he's globally banned for something vague? Same goes for a few other names on that list. I'm having a hard time buying into it.
One suspicious situation isn't enough to pull the trigger, but how many do you need in order for it to be enough?
Why not communicate genuinely instead of with this manipulative and frankly feminine bullshit?
So shills are the ones that contribute positively to the subs?
You know that's not what I meant. So do you actually want to understand my perspective or just attack me?
I'm saying that if you were a shill wanting to effect the website, what would you do? Post from brand new accounts all the time that no one trusts? Or would you put the time and effort in to appear like "one of us". I would choose the latter if my goal was to influence the website and cause damage.
Does that mean all who contribute positively are shills? Of course not. That is ridiculous, and so is trying to put those words in my mouth like you did.
You worded things badly, then when that is pointed out you give a long emotional response, and you call me the woman. You have been doing this shit all day. I am 90% sure you are a shill, or at least the biggest faggotnigger I have seen all week. You are one month old account telling others that accounts that have been active for years have been playing a long con to do X where you don't even define what X is. Then somehow claiming you know this for a fact which is impossible for you to do if you have only been here for a month.
Common tactic for shills on forums is to build a good reputation so they have more influence.
That is not worded poorly. Id phrase it that way again if I had to. I'm sorry that your reading comprehension is so poor that you took what I said and assumed I meant everyone who contributes to subverses is a shill.
Honestly all our personal shit aside, you should read more often. There's genuinely no reason for you to have interpreted what I said the way you did. That is 100% on you mate.
So shills are the ones that contribute positively to the subs?
"I asked for clarification which you never answered"
I'm saying that if you were a shill wanting to effect the website, what would you do? Post from brand new accounts all the time that no one trusts? Or would you put the time and effort in to appear like "one of us". I would choose the latter if my goal was to influence the website and cause damage.
Does that mean all who contribute positively are shills? Of course not. That is ridiculous, and so is trying to put those words in my mouth like you did.
That is two paragraphs of clarification. How you can accuse me of not clarifying when I've gone into great detail is beyond me. Again I don't even believe English is your first language at this point. You're functionally illiterate.
I said our personal stuff aside just to try and imply that it was unrelated to the argument at hand. I probably could have relayed that in a better way.
view the rest of the comments →
Zenhael ago
I'm not jiving with some of the names on that ban log. EdSnowden was here for over 4 years, and I'd gotten used to seeing his name around. He just posted a few days ago about how much he 'loved Voat.' And he's globally banned for something vague? Same goes for a few other names on that list. I'm having a hard time buying into it.
One suspicious situation isn't enough to pull the trigger, but how many do you need in order for it to be enough?
Hysterical ago
Common tactic for shills on forums is to build a good reputation so they have more influence.
Mittermeyer ago
So shills are the ones that contribute positively to the subs?
Hysterical ago
Why not communicate genuinely instead of with this manipulative and frankly feminine bullshit?
You know that's not what I meant. So do you actually want to understand my perspective or just attack me?
I'm saying that if you were a shill wanting to effect the website, what would you do? Post from brand new accounts all the time that no one trusts? Or would you put the time and effort in to appear like "one of us". I would choose the latter if my goal was to influence the website and cause damage.
Does that mean all who contribute positively are shills? Of course not. That is ridiculous, and so is trying to put those words in my mouth like you did.
Mittermeyer ago
You worded things badly, then when that is pointed out you give a long emotional response, and you call me the woman. You have been doing this shit all day. I am 90% sure you are a shill, or at least the biggest faggotnigger I have seen all week. You are one month old account telling others that accounts that have been active for years have been playing a long con to do X where you don't even define what X is. Then somehow claiming you know this for a fact which is impossible for you to do if you have only been here for a month.
Hysterical ago
That is not worded poorly. Id phrase it that way again if I had to. I'm sorry that your reading comprehension is so poor that you took what I said and assumed I meant everyone who contributes to subverses is a shill.
Honestly all our personal shit aside, you should read more often. There's genuinely no reason for you to have interpreted what I said the way you did. That is 100% on you mate.
Mittermeyer ago
Except I didn't say that, I asked for clarification which you never answered and instead got mad I even asked.
Am I supposed to know you nigger?
Hysterical ago
"Except I didn't say that, "
"I asked for clarification which you never answered"
That is two paragraphs of clarification. How you can accuse me of not clarifying when I've gone into great detail is beyond me. Again I don't even believe English is your first language at this point. You're functionally illiterate.
Hysterical ago
Alright. English is not your native language or you are nigger level IQ. You continue to misunderstand really basic sentences.
Mittermeyer ago
Great argument. I do understand, but the only one with a personal gripe is you. I don't give a fuck who you are niggerfaggot.
Hysterical ago
I said our personal stuff aside just to try and imply that it was unrelated to the argument at hand. I probably could have relayed that in a better way.
Mittermeyer ago
Yeah and my point is we don't have any personal stuff other than the argument at hand. I really don't pay attention to usernames.