A. Angel investor is normal guy that just wants voat to live.
B. Angel investor is feds and wants to track you/us closer.
C. Angel investor is SJW that will eventually destroy voat.
Either way you're still here so you can't be too concerned, IMO. Why keep stirring up shit? I understand wanting to know, but people are sounding paranoid at this point.
With A there is no harm, no foul. If I had "fuck you" money I'd fund such a project, as I think a lot of goats would do as well.
If it's C - do you think that we'd just stand by and let that shit happen? The moment they started implementing SJW shit we'd be ripping heads off. Even if they cut off the funding, we'd know that shit was up.
I think the only danger would be if it were B. And I'm pretty sure that most of us are already on some sort of list anyway, so that kind of negates B as well.
view the rest of the comments →
Derpfroot ago
Honestly, what would you do in any event?
A. Angel investor is normal guy that just wants voat to live.
B. Angel investor is feds and wants to track you/us closer.
C. Angel investor is SJW that will eventually destroy voat.
Either way you're still here so you can't be too concerned, IMO. Why keep stirring up shit? I understand wanting to know, but people are sounding paranoid at this point.
Intrixina ago
With A there is no harm, no foul. If I had "fuck you" money I'd fund such a project, as I think a lot of goats would do as well.
If it's C - do you think that we'd just stand by and let that shit happen? The moment they started implementing SJW shit we'd be ripping heads off. Even if they cut off the funding, we'd know that shit was up.
I think the only danger would be if it were B. And I'm pretty sure that most of us are already on some sort of list anyway, so that kind of negates B as well.