How "accelerationism" supposedly works:
-
Terrorist attack
-
The government uses the attack as an excuse to take away rights and freedoms
-
The populace freaks out over losing freedoms and overthrows the government
How "accelerationism" actually works:
-
Terrorist attack
-
The government uses the attack as an excuse to take away rights and freedoms
-
That's it. Nothing else happens.
I'm willing to bet that a year from now, the political climate in Australia and New Zealand will not be markedly different from today. There will be no "escalation", no further conflict, and no real change in the lives of people, except for the loss of free speech and gun rights in the wake of the recent attack. The attack and subsequent removal of rights will not prompt any mass awakening or popular revolt.
History shows us this is what happens every time. You can look back at many similar attacks that were later used to justify the removal of freedoms, and there was no mass revolt afterwards, and those freedoms were ultimately never restored.
I'm happy to debate this. However, time is all I need to prove me right. If "accelerationism" is correct, then New Zealand, Australia, and likely much of the West would be considerably more violent and conflicted by the end of this year, possibly even engaged in some kind of civil war. If I'm correct, then they will be basically the same except with less freedom for the average person. At the end of this year we'll see who is right.
Civil war and "accelerationism" are pipe dreams. No one can tell you when these will ever happen, although they tell you they'll happen "soon". This is because they're illusions with no basis in reality. They're fantasies somebody came up with because dreaming of an epic societal collapse is less work than raising a family or building a community.
"Accelerationism" is a path to losing freedom, nothing more. It is a path to failure.
view the rest of the comments →
Othmar_Regin ago
So you are saying we should just lay down and die as an alternative? And those freedoms you think we have, no we lost them decades ago we just haven't fully noticed it yet.
Delacourt ago
Every time I bring this up I receive the exact same thoughtless cookie-cutter response. "What, so you want us to just lay down and die?"
No. I don't. "Accelerationism" is the path to laying down and dying. Everyone who participates in it either dies directly, or ends up permanently removing themselves from the gene pool through life imprisonment. This is why thousands of internet tough guys like you pay lip service to it, but only a tiny handful of people are desperate or dumb enough to actually do it. It is a suicidal ideology on both the individual and collective level.
The alternative to this retard ideology is the actual strategy that works - having kids and building strong, competent communities. Look at Muslim groups that fail versus those that succeed.
Muslim groups that fail are the ones that use terrorism. Look at ISIS and Al Qaeda - both used terrorism and both are essentially fucking gone. Last I checked the ISIS "caliphate" was down to a few acres in the middle of a desert. The reason for this failure is very simple; these groups made tons of enemies. Everyone hated them and wanted them gone. Even most liberals will begrudgingly agree that ISIS and Al Qaeda are bad. The terrorism they used was not a competent strategy, but simply a symptom of their bitterness and misanthropy, and in the end it destroyed them.
On the other hand, Muslim groups that use the strategy of taqiyya thrive. These are the Muslims who claim to be "poor victims", and then come into a country, move into neighborhoods, and have 10 kids. These are the Muslims who infiltrate colleges, jobs, organizations and institutions. They network with other Muslims, preserve their culture, and create Muslim communities where previously there were none. Most importantly, they have tons and tons of fucking kids.
The thing with "accelerationism" is that no groups that ever succeeded has actually done it. It doesn't work. It's fucking cargo cult bullshit. Historically, groups win through better organization or greater numbers. There is no quick-fix, no "one neat trick" that allows a disorganized, demotivated, declining minority demographic to magically beat an organized and motivated demographic with huge numbers. The demographic having tons of kids will ALWAYS overcome the demographic that is not only not having kids, but removing itself from the gene pool.
The ONLY way to win is the hard way. That means starting families and organizing like every other culture and civilization has had to do in the history of the world. If you are a childless dead end, not involved in your local community in any way, then you are part of the problem and no amount of childish revenge fantasies is going to fix that.
Othmar_Regin ago
We are waaaay past the point of no return do you really think that the European Whites will out-breed the darkskins who have an average of 4?!
Delacourt ago
We don't need to "out-breed" them. We need to not die out in a few generations. Even if all nonwhites vanished from the Earth tomorrow, whites would eventually disappear because our replacement rate is negative.
Our problem is that our people have lost hope and lost faith in themselves, and because of this they feel they have no identity and have forsaken starting families or supporting the nation. The solution is redpilling them, showing that they have an identity, building communities and starting strong families, and restoring their faith in their race. Doing nothing other than push literally suicidal tactics on young men does not solve our problem.