It's not telling of anything except my dislike for censorship.
Now you're literally mimicking the same talking points as DI, without providing anything to back it up. Assuming you're accusing @kevdude of censorship - that is what you just did, right?
So where exactly does "censorship" come into this? I asked if you're accusing @kevdude of it, you now say you aren't, so perhaps you can explain the context of what you said?
Alright, since you have trouble reading between the lines.
I said
He's an idiot, but he's funny.
In reference to DI, then you said
so you're just going to excuse the implications of his conduct because he makes you laugh?
This comment chain has nothing to do with kev. My response was that there is no "excusing" as there are only two actions to punish someone on Voat. Censorship (and you conveniently linked one of his comments on my sub) and faggot brigading (what you guys do).
So because I don't want to censor someone, I must be "excusing" them.
The only person punishing DI, is DI, with his own words and conduct.
Nobody accused DI of censorship, whereas DI has(if I'm not mistaken) accused @kevdude of censorship.
Nobody is censoring DI, either. Or brigading him(he's earning his downvotes by his own conduct). You do however seem to be excusing the strong implication that DI engages in brigading and other subversive behavior(again, by his own words, in your own sub, which you continue to ignore), while levying that accusation(of brigading) against kevdude -- also one which DI has brought against kevdude. So, tell me again how you aren't mimicking DI?
Well for starters, you could acknowledge his conduct as subversive, rather than giving off the impression that you don't care(because he makes you laugh) and rather than trying to pass the buck on to @kevdude, who merely took DI up on his own terms.
EDIT: Oh and it doesn't help that you're parroting DI's baseless accusation(s), either.
Jesus, dude. Get a life. I'm not parroting anyone. If you have two people saying they don't like licorice - they're not copying each other, they just have an opinion.
Second, his conduct isn't subversive. Hilarious how you guys all claim the moral high ground all the time, but love to badger people with pings and character assassination.
Your sub, along with your little SRS mod friends are really the worst thing to happen to Voat.
Good thing your attention span is so short though.
view the rest of the comments →
middle_path ago
How many would it take?
argosciv ago
You did happen to see the following in your own subverse, v/JustGrowIt, right? (see archived link in quote)
https://voat.co/v/ProtectVoat/2921746/15652199
middle_path ago
He's an idiot, but he's funny. Kev is just an overzealous twat.
argosciv ago
I see, so you're just going to excuse the implications of his conduct because he makes you laugh?
Quite telling.
middle_path ago
It's not telling of anything except my dislike for censorship.
argosciv ago
Now you're literally mimicking the same talking points as DI, without providing anything to back it up. Assuming you're accusing @kevdude of censorship - that is what you just did, right?
middle_path ago
No, I wasn't accusing him of that in the least. It was a response to your comment of
But way to put words in my mouth. Feel free to join your butt buddy on my list of overzealous twats.
argosciv ago
So where exactly does "censorship" come into this? I asked if you're accusing @kevdude of it, you now say you aren't, so perhaps you can explain the context of what you said?
middle_path ago
Alright, since you have trouble reading between the lines.
I said
In reference to DI, then you said
This comment chain has nothing to do with kev. My response was that there is no "excusing" as there are only two actions to punish someone on Voat. Censorship (and you conveniently linked one of his comments on my sub) and faggot brigading (what you guys do).
So because I don't want to censor someone, I must be "excusing" them.
argosciv ago
Who said anything about punishing him?
The only person punishing DI, is DI, with his own words and conduct.
Nobody accused DI of censorship, whereas DI has(if I'm not mistaken) accused @kevdude of censorship.
Nobody is censoring DI, either. Or brigading him(he's earning his downvotes by his own conduct). You do however seem to be excusing the strong implication that DI engages in brigading and other subversive behavior(again, by his own words, in your own sub, which you continue to ignore), while levying that accusation(of brigading) against kevdude -- also one which DI has brought against kevdude. So, tell me again how you aren't mimicking DI?
middle_path ago
You keep using that word - excusing. So what would I do to not "excuse" him?
argosciv ago
Well for starters, you could acknowledge his conduct as subversive, rather than giving off the impression that you don't care(because he makes you laugh) and rather than trying to pass the buck on to @kevdude, who merely took DI up on his own terms.
EDIT: Oh and it doesn't help that you're parroting DI's baseless accusation(s), either.
middle_path ago
Jesus, dude. Get a life. I'm not parroting anyone. If you have two people saying they don't like licorice - they're not copying each other, they just have an opinion.
Second, his conduct isn't subversive. Hilarious how you guys all claim the moral high ground all the time, but love to badger people with pings and character assassination.
Your sub, along with your little SRS mod friends are really the worst thing to happen to Voat.
Good thing your attention span is so short though.
argosciv ago
You did read what he said in your own subverse, right?
Hmmmmmmm.... where have we heard that before?
Hahahahahaha. You clearly don't know me very well, or do you?
@Crensch @srayzie @kevdude
srayzie ago
Yep. Sounds familiar 🙄