Backstory:
I finally got sick of seeing anti-Q rhetoric being nothing but character attacks, goalpost-moving, and strawmen, so I finally asked someone against Q that I previously respected to defend his position. This is the abortion of a comment he provided, and I promptly destroyed it so badly that he backpedaled and unbelievably claimed it was the wrong video - after pointing me to exact times of what I should watch.
Worse, still, for the anti-Q argument, I provided to him a set of text/images that he could easily debunk if fake, and despite being raked through the coals until there was nothing left, he still hasn't even attempted to do so.
Challenge:
Present your case better than he did. Either defend your position with facts, evidence, and if a video, timestamps to the relevant parts, OR debunk these. Or even some small number of them. Even one is a better start than the aforementioned user had.
Anyone that has known me for any length of time on this site knows that I follow the evidence, and will flip on a dime if I find my position untenable. This is the place to cause that to happen.
TL;DR:
Either prove your position that Q is a LARP, or debunk these.
Promise:
If nobody manages to even cast a non-trivial amount of shade on Q, I will spend my time here demolishing everyone that dismissively mocks Q as a LARP.
If, however, you can convince me Q is a LARP, I will use your arguments to mock those that still believe in Q.
Good luck.
view the rest of the comments →
talmoridor-x ago
This video sums it up nicely:
https://hooktube.com/watch?v=RNSVrrakF6A
Also, Q IS REAL. I don't doubt that. But he and POTUS are a joint psyop to misdirect the redpilled into supporting neoconservatism
Crensch ago
From OP:
I'm not spending 40 fucking minutes of my time to prove you right. Point me to the relevant parts where this guy somehow proves your statements.
That's not what's on trial here. The buzzword of the anti-Q is "LARP". LIVE ACTION ROLE-PLAY - Suggesting he's just some random anon faggot that doesn't actually have any insider info.
Can you prove your claim about Q being a psyop for that particular purpose?
talmoridor-x ago
I can only infer at this time. Spend some time reading opposing viewpoints; actively try to prove yourself wrong, then make the judgement.
Crensch ago
Why don't all of you faggots that actively try to mock people like me, that seem to already have the info I'd be looking for, present it?
I've seen what has been presented, and like everything you posted here, it was absolutely pathetic.
How about you take a dose of your own medicine, since you want me to take my time based on your word. You've very obviously not presented anything suggesting you've done so.
talmoridor-x ago
I have, and do so constantly. For months, I was on board with the Q crowd, until Trump had passed Omnibus, and ultimately, ordered a second strike on Syria. Question everything. I wouldn't be mad if this was all part of Trump's 4-D chess master plan, I just think it's incredibly unlikely at this point.